It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another year and no disclosure

page: 2
12
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Osirisvset

I can't quote scripture and verse here but I remember hearing a few years ago where the Vatican proclaimed that if extraterrestrial life did exist it didn't contradict church doctrine. That's all I know of it.




posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: Osirisvset

I can't quote scripture and verse here but I remember hearing a few years ago where the Vatican proclaimed that if extraterrestrial life did exist it didn't contradict church doctrine. That's all I know of it.


Nothing like getting ahead of the narrative.

"Con man acknowledges criticism of his own con as proof of his con...."

News @ 11.

Tired of this foolishness, personally.
edit on 1-12-2018 by MisterSpock because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: Osirisvset

The Catholic church has accepted the possibility of extraterrestrial life and believes the idea is not contrary to Christianity and church doctrine.


The catholic church, re "Vatican city" should have been nuked decades ago.

For the sake of humanity.


Too much radioactive fallout.

But I wouldn't be opposed to a tactical non-nuclear strike.

After all the artifacts, artwork and other irreplaceable works are removed of course.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: Osirisvset

The Catholic church has accepted the possibility of extraterrestrial life and believes the idea is not contrary to Christianity and church doctrine.


The catholic church, re "Vatican city" should have been nuked decades ago.

For the sake of humanity.


Too much radioactive fallout.

But I wouldn't be opposed to a tactical non-nuclear strike.

After all the artifacts, artwork and other irreplaceable works are removed of course.


Meh, strategic assault or nukes. A horse a piece at this point.

Humanity is worthless, so a thousand years in either direction isnt much to worry about at this point.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

Your sexual obsessions inferred and inserted into your posts affects the intellectual dignity and quality of the entire site. And I just don't like you so you buy your drinks and I'll buy mine...



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

Your sexual obsessions inferred and inserted into your posts affects the intellectual dignity and quality of the entire site. And I just don't like you so you buy your drinks and I'll buy mine...


Wow, how petty of you.

Goodbye.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

Honesty is a bitch!



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

Honesty is a bitch!


It is, but I hold out hope that even the dumbest can persevere.

You'll get there. I'm rooting for you.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

I doubt you would know intellect and honesty if it slapped you in the face. I see nothing more than superficiality in your posts. Grow up dude.
edit on 1-12-2018 by CharlesT because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

I doubt you would know honesty if it slapped you in the face. I see nothing more than superficiality in your posts. Grow up dude.








posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:06 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

We can banter this crap all night. Let's just end it here, OK?

edit on 1-12-2018 by CharlesT because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:07 PM
link   
Disclosure is likely unique to each individual person. What is disclosure to you?



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

We can banter this crap all night. Let's just end it here, OK?



Seems fair, since you started it. I'll concede to let you "end" it.

I'll harbor no Ill will to why your psyche latched on to me.

I have no problem with you, I understand you may be working through something that made you act like an ass.

Still, after all that. Drinks are still on me.

edit on 1-12-2018 by MisterSpock because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

IRK, IRK, IRK. What am I doing here bantering with an intellectual idiot. I quit.


You made me act like an ass.... The end....

edit on 1-12-2018 by CharlesT because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

IRK, IRK, IRK. What am I doing here bantering with an intellectual idiot. I quit.


Considering my initial response was to the OP, and not to you, witch you latched onto as a talking point to attack me, who's the intellectual idiot?

Dial your # back and get some perspective. Or just f off.

I've been nice to you considering your arbitrary targeting of my post that wasn't even directed at you in the first place.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

IRK, IRK, IRK. What am I doing here bantering with an intellectual idiot. I quit.


I "made" you do nothing. Re your edit.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

IRK, IRK, IRK. What am I doing here bantering with an intellectual idiot. I quit.


Considering my initial response was to the OP, and not to you, witch you latched onto as a talking point to attack me, who's the intellectual idiot?

Dial your # back and get some perspective. Or just f off.

I've been nice to you considering your arbitrary targeting of my post that wasn't even directed at you in the first place.

I have reviewed some of your past posts. Jerk!



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

I continue on because I am enjoying telling you what a jerk you are.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:21 PM
link   
It's hard to believe that so many otherwise intelligent people out there buy into this UFO nonsense.



posted on Dec, 1 2018 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: MisterSpock

IRK, IRK, IRK. What am I doing here bantering with an intellectual idiot. I quit.


Considering my initial response was to the OP, and not to you, witch you latched onto as a talking point to attack me, who's the intellectual idiot?

Dial your # back and get some perspective. Or just f off.

I've been nice to you considering your arbitrary targeting of my post that wasn't even directed at you in the first place.

I have reviewed some of your past posts. Jerk!


Your problems aren't with me, but yourself.

Take some time off the internet and stop randomly attacking people online for your own problems.

I'm a logical person, albeit with a twisted sense of humor.

I'm a passavist, but the way you have acted here is pathetic. In a way I'm glad you vented it online. Because even I, in real life, would have stomped your stupidity into a curb in real life if you vented randomly on me like you have.

You really need to check that #.




top topics



 
12
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join