pResident tRump will receive Putin’s performance review after all.

Sorry folks, I must apologize.
I went back and read what was being commented on.
In my first post I wrote "during" the election.
Not sure why I wrote that, must have been failing at multitasking. My head was saying "after" the election and my fingers said "during".

I was trying to say that people were saying trump would start ww3 because of his aggressive foreign policy with North Korea, iran and russia.

Oh, well. I admit my mistakes....

a reply to: SlapMonkey

The probably don't have that one on karaoke night down at the post.

a reply to: soundguy

Content?

originally posted by: soundguy

I beleive the content is more important than how it’s delivered.

It is, but there's no content of substance here. Having worked in marketing, if you're trying to sell obvious snake oil, you better come with a palatable message/delivery that people will believe. You failed both in content and delivery.

#ConstructiveCriticismHasValue

I notice that you and the rest of your ilk have yet to address the subject matter. No surprise there.

Well, I replied directly to what you said in your OP, apparently you just ignored it because you can't argue the reality that sometimes plans change, and to act all snivelly and immature over POTUS changing plans to meet with a world leader after a cancellation of the meeting is laughable and doesn't deserve much of a response.

It's hard to respond to zero substance with substance. It's easy, though, to pretend that an inability or unwillingness to try somehow makes everyone calling you out over the idiocy of the OP a 'right-winger waiting for talking points.'

They're here

a reply to: shooterbrody

Well, they effin' should!

a reply to: SlapMonkey

Oh I agree, but that would attract a shady crowd and the bluehairs down at the post won't abide that.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: szino9

cuz rump is frowned upon...

Tell that to Wreckx-N-Effect

And the Beasties!

Yes the majority of which is contained within the links provided. Sorry I couldn’t draw pictures for you.

1: make decraitive statement.
2: provide evidence to bolster said statement.
3: reply to rwnj’s who have no clue what’s going on.

a reply to: JinMI

originally posted by: soundguy
I know, it’s so easy to trigger rw snowflakes it’s not even funny. Anyway, I’m sure you read the op in it’s entirety. Right wingers lie, they lie all the time. It’s what they do. Just like their hero trump. a reply to: Xtrozero

Well that's it, I'm convinced.


Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic

originally posted by: knoxie
love the responses so far - always fun!

just saw video of the Saudi prince and putin practically high fiving each other and laughing. damn, we look weak.

Practically?

a reply to: soundguy

Decraitive.


Interesting.



What does rwnj mean? Is English your first lAnguage?

originally posted by: soundguy
I beleive the content is more important than how it’s delivered. I notice that you and the rest of your ilk have yet to address the subject matter. No surprise there. Hopefully you guys will get your talking points soon. Otherwise you will be reduced to making gurgles and clicking sounds with you tongues. a reply to: LSU2018

Truth of the matter is, nobody buys what you're selling. Especially when you start out with the same form as a tweener.

a reply to: underpass61

You win for better song. Might I propose that this song cause the rump shaking that inspired Wreckx-N-Effect's song? It's a symbiotic relationship.

I'm sure that Kevin Bacon is involved in there somewhere, too.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: LSU2018

My ATS Motto: Hope for the best, but expect the worst.

Her response, along with her inundation with her pointless one-line replies to everyone's comment, was expected. She probably started salivating at the mouth when she saw the childish headline pop up when she refreshed the "New Topics" page and couldn't help but to satiate her appetite.

But in fairness, I saw the childish headline, too, and came in to make my comment based on the stupidity of it, so I can't get too mad at her. lol

That's so true. I always catch myself snorting lightly when I see a thread like this and then get called the weak or immature one, or best of all, the emotional snowflake. It's a daily reminder (not that I need one) that they always point at you for the stuff they're guilty of. And they know it.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: soundguy

I beleive the content is more important than how it’s delivered.

It is, but there's no content of substance here. Having worked in marketing, if you're trying to sell obvious snake oil, you better come with a palatable message/delivery that people will believe. You failed both in content and delivery.

#ConstructiveCriticismHasValue

I notice that you and the rest of your ilk have yet to address the subject matter. No surprise there.

Well, I replied directly to what you said in your OP, apparently you just ignored it because you can't argue the reality that sometimes plans change, and to act all snivelly and immature over POTUS changing plans to meet with a world leader after a cancellation of the meeting is laughable and doesn't deserve much of a response.

It's hard to respond to zero substance with substance. It's easy, though, to pretend that an inability or unwillingness to try somehow makes everyone calling you out over the idiocy of the OP a 'right-winger waiting for talking points.'

And it goes without mentioning that the ilk he's referring to has had the same response to his BS because we don't need talking points when we posses the ability to think on our own.

a reply to: soundguy

The guy is a Ruskie puppet.

No the truth of matter is, I have a lot of claims on my attention. When I get a chance to read replies I want to respond to them all. Sometimes I confuse who I’m responding to. This site is clunkier than I’m used to and I can’t really get a good grip on how to use quotes or even to know if someone responded to me personally.

Anyway, it is at the very least, another case of trump saying one thing and doing another. Another day in the life of having a serial/pathological liar occupying the Whitehouse.

If I could feel compassion towards rwnj’s and trolls, I would truly feel sad for them. I can’t imagine being so devoid of self worth that I would accept lies on an almost daily basis from the commander in chief. I don’t suffer liars in real life and I damn well don’t suffer them in political office.

a reply to: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: underpass61

You win for better song. Might I propose that this song cause the rump shaking that inspired Wreckx-N-Effect's song? It's a symbiotic relationship.

I'm sure that Kevin Bacon is involved in there somewhere, too.

Not sure which came first. I'm sure that sOundguy hates 'em both though.
He's bitter because he's stuck at the divebar doing a mic check for bands like Generic Blues Disaster or the Classic Rock Geezers.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: soundguy

The guy is a Ruskie puppet.

Ruskie Puppet comes on after the Classic Rock Geezers.