It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

President Trump Says If House Democrats Attack - He Will Declassify Info That Will Destroy Them.

page: 19
78
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 3 2018 @ 07:49 AM
link   
a reply to: ghostingmiranda

Bluffing and bull#ting with the laws of the country.
If he has evidence of a crime and he is witholding that he is committing a crime as well.
Accessory after the fact....




posted on Dec, 3 2018 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: boogiegk

I really need a emoji that implies a stifled laugh.

When was that dude?



posted on Dec, 3 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Blarneystoner

Hmmm... seems someone is taking this a little bit personally while claiming he doesn't care about it.

Interesting.

TheRedneck


Hmmm.... Nope.

See, I don't spend all my time here and I don't think that anything I say here is of any consequence. And I certainly don't pretend that conversations here are important or facilitate any sort of change. I kind of feel sorry for those that do.... including you brother.

BTW - you've been here long nough to know what Ad Hominem and Strawman arguments are but you consistently use them. One more reason to pity you.... smh... sad.


Have a lovely day...



posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 07:05 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

Clinton did not approve any warrants the judges on the panel did. Nothing was, what's that word ginned? ginned up? The dossier was only part of the data used to obtain the warrant on Carter Page.
And can you tell me why a warrant for a nobody on the trump campaign who wasn't even working for the campaign any longer has become so very important? Its a friggin bone you guys won't let go of even though there's no meat on it.
Just like the U1 story...
My posts reflect reality. They reflect what is really happening and it has nothing to do with the fantasys flung around these parts.
This week and the next few are going to be pretty rough for this crowd to take.



posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 07:10 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

What trials? Mueller will issue a report and he has indicated that he is wrapping things up from what he has communicated to defense attorneys involved in the case so I expect some kind of resolution very soon.

This week sentencing memos for Michael Flynn ( today) and Paul Manafort ( Friday) will be released to the public for the first time.
And better look out for witness tampering charges with trumps tweets about Jerome Corsi... They moved in that direction on Manafort when he tried to contact witnesses.
edit on 1242018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 07:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pteridine

What trials? Mueller will issue a report and he has indicated that he is wrapping things up from what he has communicated to defense attorneys involved in the case so I expect some kind of resolution very soon.

This week sentencing memos for Michael Flynn ( today) and Paul Manafort ( Friday) will be released to the public for the first time.
And better look out for witness tampering charges with trumps tweets about Jerome Corsi... They moved in that direction on Manafort when he tried to contact witnesses.


All of this remains to be seen. As of now, there is only speculation; yours that the Clintons and others will not be tried for their actions and mine that there were many criminals in the Obama Administration, including Obama, and that at least some will be tried for their crimes.

If there are 60,000 sealed indictments, I have a better chance of being correct.



posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The people voted Trump in to drain the swamp and bring Justice, not engage in political blackmail, which is a form of corruption.

Just release it already!



posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


What trials? Mueller will issue a report and he has indicated that he is wrapping things up from what he has communicated to defense attorneys involved in the case so I expect some kind of resolution very soon.


What trials indeed.

There won't be any trials or report unless Acting AG Whitaker decides it is warranted. If he does, the DOJ may make a referral to Congress to initiate impeachment proceedings. However, given the DOJ ignoring Congressional criminal referrals, I fully expect Congress to ignore/reject any such referral from the DOJ (although it is unlikely Whitaker will make any such referral no matter what)


And better look out for witness tampering charges with trumps tweets about Jerome Corsi... They moved in that direction on Manafort when he tried to contact witnesses.


That's just silly. He's allowed to express his opinion and he's allowed to point out factual information. He's merely exercising his first amendment rights. Again, not that any of it matters since like I explained to you several times already Mueller can't use the restroom with AG Whitaker accompanying him.

I wouldn't hold my breath. Mueller has been neutered. Please don't force me to make that point any clearer.
edit on 12/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2018 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


Bluffing and bull#ting with the laws of the country.
If he has evidence of a crime and he is witholding that he is committing a crime as well.
Accessory after the fact....


You are full of it.

It does not make you an "accessory" to have evidence of a crime without revealing it any more than it makes you a member of a conspiracy by merely being aware of the conspiracy, the intent to violate the law or issuing statements of support for said conspiracy.

You need to learn a lot more about US law. I recommend cracking open Title 18 USC and reading the precise statutes: there is no "spirit of the law" it must be precisely as it is written. To the very letter.

So when the same document says this:


One who has no knowledge of the unlawful plan does not become a member of a conspiracy simply because one happens to be present at an event or transaction or because one happens to commit an act which inadvertently furthers some object of the unlawful plan or conspiracy. One does not become a member of a conspiracy through an association with members of the conspiracy or by the mere knowledge that a conspiracy exists.


You should be very concerned about the prospects for any sort of criminal outcome on this.

SOURCE: www.justice.gov...

Some more good reading

www.nytimes.com...

"Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia"

thehill.com...

"Lisa Page bombshell: FBI couldn’t prove Trump-Russia collusion before Mueller appointment"

Since you know so much about federal law, care to enlighten us on the reason for Mueller's appointment when the investigators themselves admit there wasn't any evidence of so-called "collusion" ? Because if you had bothered to read the law regarding appointment of special counsel, you'd see this was a requirement (not one of those optional things you guys like to imagine when it doesn't suit your needs)



posted on Dec, 7 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
Exactly , any trump supporters that support this is in fact no better than the blind Hillary supporters.

Highly disappointing and he must be held to the fire on this. If he has prove that the Democrats broke the law and are in fact the scum that most reasonable adults can see , then he needs to do the right thing for the people and expose them versus bribing them to do his bidding.

No.

You need to stop and think... and understand what he is up against.

Timing is everything.



posted on Dec, 7 2018 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: interupt42
Exactly , any trump supporters that support this is in fact no better than the blind Hillary supporters.

Highly disappointing and he must be held to the fire on this. If he has prove that the Democrats broke the law and are in fact the scum that most reasonable adults can see , then he needs to do the right thing for the people and expose them versus bribing them to do his bidding.

No.

You need to stop and think... and understand what he is up against.

Timing is everything.


The more time goes by the more likely nothing will happen. Fast forward to 2019 the neacon republicans in congress will point the finger to house controlled democrats and vice versa. Then the blame game will continue.

I always said that trump was the lesser risk between Trump and Hillary because at worst trump would become hillary. It appears that is the way its going.

The wall is BS and not needed to control immigration. you just need to prosecute the companies that hire illegals and the vast majority will stop coming. That also frees up the resources and man power to keep an eye on the smaller percentage of illegals that come here solely with bad intentions.

The net neutrality repeal was BS and gave full control to the deep state on the last frontier where the little guy had a voice bigger than the corporations.

Hiding prove of the unethical and possibly of illegal activities of the left for leverage is no different than what we have had before.

I'm willing to wait by the next election and that is only because its been a crazy election, but very little expectations and the more time goes by the less appealing trump is becoming. Everyday that goes by its beginning to look more likely that we have traded one puppet master for another . So when is you time limit to call out his BS? next election, never, etc?
edit on 181231America/ChicagoFri, 07 Dec 2018 18:18:23 -0600000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2018 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The queen newbie just threatened Trump jr. Here comes the hammer and bye bye Dems if they do try to question anyone from Trumps family.



posted on Dec, 8 2018 @ 07:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: RudeMarine
a reply to: carewemust

The queen newbie just threatened Trump jr. Here comes the hammer and bye bye Dems if they do try to question anyone from Trumps family.


You're referring to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? She's just a fly in the room. Annoying, but nothing more.



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 16  17  18   >>

log in

join