It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why the MSM is called the enemy.

page: 3
30
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 27 2018 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Painterz

post your proof.




posted on Nov, 27 2018 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The MSM has all but been ignoring the huge protests in France...characterizing it as protests against high fuel prices when, in reality, it is a massive rebellion against Macron's absurd 'Climate Change' carbon tax.



You are using the word "absurd" and I do not think that his carbon tax is "absurd". It is high and costly, but absurd has a different meaning.

Pressure on peoples wallets is a way to find new solutions, and those solutions might happen with better public transport, more electric cars on cheaper prices, people stopping use their SUV to drive to the next grocery store to buy a single packet of chilenian pepper and such nonsense.
People can actually do something for their childrens future.

So , you live in France and pay the carbon taxes ?
Or do you have plans to move there for the sole reason of paying said taxes ?
Please tell me more .




posted on Nov, 27 2018 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

I agree, Fox News is the enemy of the people that is nothing more that a Republican propaganda outlet. Whenever a Republican is POTUS Fox News then becomes State Sponsored propaganda outlet.



posted on Nov, 27 2018 @ 07:02 PM
link   
Fox news did the same stuff during Obama's reign. Just remember, MSN is both the left and right. You can't exit the matrix by only seeing half the illusion.



posted on Nov, 27 2018 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Here is an article talking about the science behind global warming causing stronger hurricanes. I would read the article. There isn't enough data on hurricanes in the early 1900's and 1800's to make an accurate prediction for the future from this data, however, scientists have successfully made a model that can predict hurricane intensity and rainfall rates rather well.

Here is what their model predicts for the late 21st century hurricanes:


Our more recent late 21st century projections of hurricane activity continue to support the notion of increased intensity (~ 4%) and near-storm rainfall rates (~ 10 to 15%) for the Atlantic basin.


Here is the conclusion of the study:


In summary, neither our model projections for the 21st century nor our analyses of trends in Atlantic hurricane and tropical storm counts over the past 120+ yr support the notion that greenhouse gas-induced warming leads to large increases in either tropical storm or overall hurricane numbers in the Atlantic.

While one of our modeling studies projects a large (~100%) increase in Atlantic category 4-5 hurricanes over the 21st century, we estimate that such an increase would not be detectable until the latter half of the century, and we still have only low confidence that such an increase will occur in the Atlantic basin, based on an updated survey of subsequent modeling studies by our and other groups.

Therefore, we conclude that despite statistical correlations between SST and Atlantic hurricane activity in recent decades, it is premature to conclude that human activity–and particularly greenhouse warming–has already caused a detectable change in Atlantic hurricane activity. (“Detectable” here means the change is large enough to be distinguishable from the variability due to natural causes.)

However, human activity may have already caused some changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observation limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

We also conclude that it is likely that climate warming will cause Atlantic hurricanes in the coming century to have higher rainfall rates than present-day hurricanes and medium confidence that they will be more intense (higher peak winds and lower central pressures) on average. In our view, it is uncertain how the annual number of Atlantic tropical storms will change over the 21st century. All else equal, tropical cyclone surge levels should increase with sea level rise as projected for example by IPCC AR5.

These assessment statements are intended to apply to climate warming of the type projected for the 21st century by prototype IPCC mid-range warming scenarios, such as A1B or RCP4.5. The relatively conservative confidence levels attached to our tropical cyclone projections, and the lack of a claim of detectable anthropogenic influence on tropical cyclones at this time contrasts with the situation for other climate metrics, such as global mean temperature. In the case of global mean surface temperature, the IPCC AR5 presents a strong body of scientific evidence that most of the global warming observed over the past half century is very likely due to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.


Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Library
edit on 27pmTue, 27 Nov 2018 19:56:09 -0600kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2018 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: darkbake

You do understand that this is based on computer modeling alone?

How accurate is that modeling considering they more or less admit that they cannot identify whether there are any current causitive factors between so-called man-made climate change and hurricane activity, only an apparent correlative relationship? If they cannot identify any factors at work directly to put into their model, then how do they at all know the models they are using are anything more than hypothetical guesswork based on what they believe will happen?

And how many model projections that we've been told about have been accurate so far?



posted on Nov, 28 2018 @ 05:03 AM
link   
a reply to: darkbake

you may want to re-read that. It doesn't say what you think it does.



posted on Nov, 28 2018 @ 06:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: network dude

Here is an article talking about the science behind global warming causing stronger hurricanes. I would read the article. There isn't enough data on hurricanes in the early 1900's and 1800's to make an accurate prediction for the future from this data, however, scientists have successfully made a model that can predict hurricane intensity and rainfall rates rather well.

Here is what their model predicts for the late 21st century hurricanes:


Our more recent late 21st century projections of hurricane activity continue to support the notion of increased intensity (~ 4%) and near-storm rainfall rates (~ 10 to 15%) for the Atlantic basin.


Here is the conclusion of the study:


In summary, neither our model projections for the 21st century nor our analyses of trends in Atlantic hurricane and tropical storm counts over the past 120+ yr support the notion that greenhouse gas-induced warming leads to large increases in either tropical storm or overall hurricane numbers in the Atlantic.

While one of our modeling studies projects a large (~100%) increase in Atlantic category 4-5 hurricanes over the 21st century, we estimate that such an increase would not be detectable until the latter half of the century, and we still have only low confidence that such an increase will occur in the Atlantic basin, based on an updated survey of subsequent modeling studies by our and other groups.

Therefore, we conclude that despite statistical correlations between SST and Atlantic hurricane activity in recent decades, it is premature to conclude that human activity–and particularly greenhouse warming–has already caused a detectable change in Atlantic hurricane activity. (“Detectable” here means the change is large enough to be distinguishable from the variability due to natural causes.)

However, human activity may have already caused some changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observation limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

We also conclude that it is likely that climate warming will cause Atlantic hurricanes in the coming century to have higher rainfall rates than present-day hurricanes and medium confidence that they will be more intense (higher peak winds and lower central pressures) on average. In our view, it is uncertain how the annual number of Atlantic tropical storms will change over the 21st century. All else equal, tropical cyclone surge levels should increase with sea level rise as projected for example by IPCC AR5.

These assessment statements are intended to apply to climate warming of the type projected for the 21st century by prototype IPCC mid-range warming scenarios, such as A1B or RCP4.5. The relatively conservative confidence levels attached to our tropical cyclone projections, and the lack of a claim of detectable anthropogenic influence on tropical cyclones at this time contrasts with the situation for other climate metrics, such as global mean temperature. In the case of global mean surface temperature, the IPCC AR5 presents a strong body of scientific evidence that most of the global warming observed over the past half century is very likely due to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.


Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Library


Another computer model that says beware just wait 10 years, and when the 10 years has passed with their predictions being observed and proven wrong they will just add another 10 years and start the alarm over.. It the mean time their request for more funding will continue for a newer bigger better model.. Their models over the last thirty years are not something I would bet the farm on and that is for sure !

The experts and Spock as the narrator said back in 1979 we were entering a new ice age and they could prove it .. Their claim the earth had cooled 2C from 1959 until 1979 was one of the indicators along with ice and sediment cores from the ocean. 1977 and 1979 were very bad in the N.E. USA with people being stranded and freezing in their cars even in big cities... Real climatologist real geologists real people who think they know this stuff.. Actually it is not their fault for the indicators were there and not some faulty computer model for their estimates of what might happen.
youtu.be...


Now as far as the MSN, especially with CNN, anyone who has watched the president speak and how the news take something out of context or even just makes stuff up is all the evidence anyone needs IMO on just how corrupt and lying they can be..

Of course if all people do is watch CNN and MSN they believe the drivel they produce and still claim it is news.. NWO can not tolerate a president who believes in borders and national sovereignty much less is trying to bring jobs and not welfare back to Americans. We the people of the world are all supposed be be equal in our misery so that everyone suffers by the hands of agenda 21/30 and the, "lets kill a few billion people to make the world feel better" crowd.



posted on Nov, 28 2018 @ 07:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: network dude

I agree, Fox News is the enemy of the people that is nothing more that a Republican propaganda outlet. Whenever a Republican is POTUS Fox News then becomes State Sponsored propaganda outlet.
This, classroom, is indoctrination 😌

Only Fox and no other network, eh? Because they do no wrong and all news reported is factual to the tee. No slander or twisting of the message, clear cut, no emotional appeal writing, right?




top topics



 
30
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join