It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear
Betty Hill made a comment about one of the main interlopers having their lips behind their mouth. It's been a while since I listened to the audio and I'm not quite saying it accurately. It left the impression that she was possibly describing someone in a mask without realising it.
I'm pretty Swiss regarding the MKULTRA explanations because so much speculation, and often certainties, has been based on so little information. It was proposed as an explanation for the 1954 French wave of humanoid encounters too. I struggle to picture so much theatre being successfully enacted in isolated rural areas.
That isn't to say it should be dismissed altogether because 'so little information' goes both ways. I don't know.
The Pascagoula case is presented in many skeptics book as a definite hoax. The explanation is mainly based on the fact that there were other people in that area near to the Pascagoula River at the abduction time but no one else saw or heard anything unusual and it is proposed that if there was really such an object with a bright light, more people than only Hickson and Parker would have seen it..
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
I only invoke MKultra for that village in france, some of the chupa chupa "incidents" (such as in the philippiens where it's bascially proven to have been an operation)