It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton

page: 6
29
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

America in 2018... fascists on one side, morons on the other, no middle ground visible. That's swell.




posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Well they beat nazi to death so now its fascist



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Ut oh someone ought to tell the orange one that. Oh and while they are at it they should show him how to properly use exclamation points and other punctuation.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

You should have read the post I was replying to before you answered that. LOL.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


Those are just labels with different meanings to different people. And we are a democracy, FYI. Maybe not a perfect one but a democracy

What we are not, thank God, is a country that allows the kind of actions Trump is trying to get away with



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Trump brought the hammer down n himself when he fired Comey because of that Rusher Thing....



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell




Those are just labels with different meanings to different people.


No. They have actual definitions. Really, they do.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: interupt42

Ha ha 38 additional seats and growing says otherwise my little friend. But you know denial is a coping method too I hear.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: timequake

Wrong there wasnt an attempt to prosecute because she didnt commit a crime. You guys just refuse to see it.
And I do not need to be walked through it. Give me a break. Maybe you walk through it and you will finally see what the truth is.


You poor thing.... they technically admitted that the facts of the crime existed, but then made a subjective (i.e., bias) claim she didn't have the intent. That is an important distinction considering that there was enough for at least an indictment--for a jury to decide. You really don't understand how this all works, do you?



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Well they beat nazi to death so now its fascist


It's funny they keep calling other people fascist....

People from their party are actively trying to turn over votes ILEGALLY in their favor or flat out stall the election process

Yet they advocate for harassment of people of dif political views....

They're trying to silence speech and run people off campuses....

They're physically attacking people they don't politically agree w in an attempt to silence them

They're destroying buildings of opposing political people

They're showing up at news anchors houses in an attempt to silence them because they don't like their questions

They show up at political figures houses in an attempt to silence and harass....

All these are fascist in nature...... And all coming from people calling US fascist....

The stupid is strong
edit on 11/20/2018 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)

edit on 11/20/2018 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)

edit on 11/20/2018 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123

I dont have to prove anything. I think his meltdown is proving everything. He sure is nervous isnt he?
Copout.

So you're just lazy and unable to, or rather, you just don't have what it takes 😲

I'd say you haven't the guts or spine to challenge that 🤕

Nobody is having a meltdown. Everytime you state something, it's the exact opposite. ATS has lonh caught onto that tap dance and spin 🤭

The nervousness you speak of is Dims shaking in their boots at the FISA declass, expect deals to be made 😌



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Orwell did a fine job of predicting that, didn't he?



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
link

Trump doesn’t understand how a democracy suppose to work. Like a banana republic, he thinks the DOJ is suppose to go about prosecuting his political enemies at his whim.


His ''political enemies''?

How about
''corrupt officials who broke the law and tried to corrupt other branches of government to tear down an elected official ''

I couldn't care less who's political enemies they were, they broke the law.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Look, if Obama was trying what Trump is trying to do you folks would be saying just what I am saying.

If Trump has his way he would be doing fascist-like actions.

Trump shows us our system however flawed, and it is flawed to beat the ban, nevertheless is working when Trumps attempts to subvert the law is exposed and stopped.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:48 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Why would you think I know who you voted for?



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

That's NOT for Trump to decide but the law and officials whose job that is to impartially investigate and prosecute.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Look2theSacredHeart

I was answering a specific post where someone said something about stupid people guys..... Learn how to backtrack or stay out of the conversation. Please.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Why would you think I know who you voted for?
Does hardcore leftist liberal NPC with a broadstroke view come to mind?

Not pointing fingers 🤐
edit on 20-11-2018 by Arnie123 because: Heh



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Agit8dChop

That's NOT for Trump to decide but the law and officials whose job that is to impartially investigate and prosecute.


What happens when those law officials receive financial rewards from said person being investigated?
What happens when the spouse of said person being investigated meets with the AG in private?

Is that considered an impartial investigation?



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Why would you think I know who you voted for?



Ahhh short term memory loss huh?

Just a few pages back you tried to pigeonhole me so you tell me?

Also The 2016 election debates on this forum weren't that long ago and you were heavily involved.....

Not surprised tho it was only one page back that Burdman posted an article that proved you wrong and you've already forgotten about that and ignored it......

Color me unimpressed
edit on 11/20/2018 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
29
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join