It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
She said one of her aunts requested the protective order to temporarily remove Willis’ guns.
The officers serving the order have a right to protect themselves. They did not create the order or the law. Had the man complied with the legal order he would still be alive.
Being an inflexible oak on the matter only means you will lose in the end.
The writers of this law have blood on their hands. They will continue to have blood on their hands as long as it is in effect. This law will get formerly law-abiding gun owners hurt and killed. What's to stop an angry family member or jilted romantic partner from using this law as a weapon? I can foresee people using this as the new "Swatting", hoping to see something bad happen to the accused.
There is no reasonable, peaceful or practical way such a thing could ever be enforced.
originally posted by: JinMI
They are not coming for your guns
They are not coming for your guns
They are not coming for your guns
Lex iniusta non est lex