It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nationalism, humor and reality

page: 2
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fools
Given your example, name one nationally accepted comedian that could make jokes about black nationalism while at the same time possessing white or pinkish skin.

Guess what? They don't exist. Even saying the N word will destroy their career.

You are making a foolish example, what it seems to me is that you are perfectly happy to continue to see white men degraded and silenced so you can have some sort of "brown nationalism."

I mean there exists more black and meztizo separatist groups than white and they get ACTUAL support and cred from Socialist NGO's. You do that right? Of course you don't.


THIS ^^^

I'm adding this OP to my growing scrapbook of fear porn against nationalism. Education for future generations.




posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 04:52 PM
link   
can you tell me what standard are you are deciding what people are better then the other? Seems like you are using sex and race.

If i am correct, doesn't that make you a text book racist and sexist?



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Mahogany

Fake pictures.

Republicans have 23 Women in the House.



Newly elected. These are the people just elected. Republicans elected all white men and 1 white woman.


The House has full elections every 2 years.

So 23 Republican Women got elected Nov 6th πŸ˜†


NEWLY elected. Not kept their previous seats. Why is that hard?

But it would be interesting to see a photo of the ENTIRE Congress and see how it compares. Your derail failed, but you can always compile an image of the whole Congress for us.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
can you tell me what standard are you are deciding what people are better then the other? Seems like you are using sex and race.

If i am correct, doesn't that make you a text book racist and sexist?



My standard is that everyone can be intelligent, successful and deserving of representing us, for example... even if they are not white men. Skin color and gender should not matter like it seems it does for the red party.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
can you tell me what standard are you are deciding what people are better then the other? Seems like you are using sex and race.

If i am correct, doesn't that make you a text book racist and sexist?



My standard is that everyone can be intelligent, successful and deserving of representing us, for example... even if they are not white men. Skin color and gender should not matter like it seems it does for the red party.


So why you moaning about the people that actually won an election then? Or is it just because you are unable to believe that their colour and gender aren't somehow deficient?


Look in the mirror, mate. you aren't much different to the guy wearing a klan hat on the weekends



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: SprocketUK

Moaning? I'm sorry I angered you.

I am just pointing out that the American Republicans obviously don't share that same standard I just explained. If they did there would be a variety of gender and color in their freshman representatives as well.

It is painfully obvious that is not true.

The American Republicans chose exclusively white and male in 2018, for their freshmen (and one token white woman). Not a good thing and it shows that Nationalism may not be as easy going as patriotism is.

Have a nice day.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Maybe too many old white men is why so many young black men are in prison. Keep petty crimes like marijuana and lock them up for 10 years whenever possible.

It should be about the best candidate, but the Republican Party is going to be the dying party (in the future) when they distance themselves away from growing trends.

Anyway Carlin is awesome.

Proud to be American? God bless America? Silly things we say...



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Mahogany

Fake pictures.

Republicans have 23 Women in the House.



Newly elected. These are the people just elected. Republicans elected all white men and 1 white woman.


The House has full elections every 2 years.

So 23 Republican Women got elected Nov 6th


NEWLY elected. Not kept their previous seats. Why is that hard?

But it would be interesting to see a photo of the ENTIRE Congress and see how it compares. Your derail failed, but you can always compile an image of the whole Congress for us.


They still had to beat an opponent.

23 Women Republicans got elected to the House πŸ˜†

Not easy for Democrats to swallow.

Gulp πŸš¬πŸ’¨



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

what is so wrong about voting for someone white? Especially when people tend to vote along party lines...Voters have no choice in who the candidate is. In some constituencies, Osama Bin Laden would be elected if he was a member of the right party.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

You say that republicans are just voting for white men on principle.
I say that democrats are doing the exact same thing.
They are placing priority on gender and color over qualifications.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: Mahogany

what is so wrong about voting for someone white? Especially when people tend to vote along party lines...Voters have no choice in who the candidate is. In some constituencies, Osama Bin Laden would be elected if he was a member of the right party.



Even with what you said, it's still the same thing.

If you vote down the party line, like you just said, and it's all white men to choose from on the Republican side, it's still the same problem. Those people were voted on and have won the primaries to be there.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

Ok, so would yo vote a white nationalist in? Or someone who hates everything about you?
Why should other people have to vote for someone they don't like?

Why should the worst candidate get the job just because they are a fashionable colour, gender or sexuality?

Like I said earlier, where are the working class people in EITHER list? I don't see any. But hey, focus on the stuff that doesnt matter instead and watch the world continue to go down the toilet.



edit on 59pWed, 14 Nov 2018 17:25:59 -060020182018-11-14T17:25:59-06:00kAmerica/Chicago30000000k by SprocketUK because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Mahogany

Fake pictures.

Republicans have 23 Women in the House.



Newly elected. These are the people just elected. Republicans elected all white men and 1 white woman.


The House has full elections every 2 years.

So 23 Republican Women got elected Nov 6th


NEWLY elected. Not kept their previous seats. Why is that hard?

But it would be interesting to see a photo of the ENTIRE Congress and see how it compares. Your derail failed, but you can always compile an image of the whole Congress for us.


They still had to beat an opponent.

23 Women Republicans got elected to the House πŸ˜†

Not easy for Democrats to swallow.

Gulp πŸš¬πŸ’¨


Hard to swallow? Why would that be?

Most women vote Democrat and almost all educated women vote Democrat. That is why the Democrats have 3x as many women in the House as the Republicans.

Why would a positive fact be hard to swallow. I don't think you know how to play this game well.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: Mahogany

Ok, so would yo vote a white nationalist in? Or someone who hates everything about you?
Why should other people have to vote for someone they don't like?

Why should the worst candidate get the job just because they are a fashionable colour, gender or sexuality?

Like I said earlier, where are the working class people in EITHER list? I don't see any. But hey, focus on the stuff that doesnt matter instead and watch the world continue to go down the toilet.




So you think a non-white, non-male person would hate everything about you and that is why it's a safe bet to only vote in white males?

Did I get your meaning right?



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:37 PM
link   
a reply to: MahoganyWhen you look at what the modern left message is...Its generally and I am paraphrasing here, something along the lines of "straight, white men are evil."


Which I am sure, you would agree is a load of tosh.


years back, when politics generally worked well, there was decent representation across the strata of society, from really poor to really rich.
Those in charge changed the game and made it all about gender, race etc. Thus ensuring nothing ever gets better.

If you bought into all that race and gender rubbish (And it looks like you have) then you are one of the fools who are enabling the further disenfranchisement of the people as a whole.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: SprocketUK

I think it's pretty clear that I am not buying into that bs you said they are selling to us. Quite the opposite, I believe in equality and I believe we all bleed the same blood and die from the same injuries and suffer the same heartbreaks.

It looks like I am a minority though, and it certainly looks like those who sell that bs you mentioned, sold it to an entire party this year.

It looks like a White XMas on one side of the isle.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany




It differs from patriotism, regardless of some dictionary quote.Β 



I suppose if a definition doesn't fit your agenda, then you just rewrite it ? Patriotism has also been redefined as racist when it too fails to meet the agenda. I suppose there will soon be a rewrite of collusion to fit the agenda as well as a drive to make it an actual criminal act. I suppose I can make up definitions and read people's mind as to what they really mean ?



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

You said this in an above post.

"Most women vote Democrat and almost all educated women vote Democrat. That is why the Democrats have 3x as many women in the House as the Republicans. "

How can you bitch about Republican voters voting for white guys but are perfectly ok with women voting for women?
Selective bias?



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Mahogany

You said this in an above post.

"Most women vote Democrat and almost all educated women vote Democrat. That is why the Democrats have 3x as many women in the House as the Republicans. "

How can you bitch about Republican voters voting for white guys but are perfectly ok with women voting for women?
Selective bias?


So you're saying all Republicans are white men and therefore they vote for white men?



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

neener neener bye bye πŸ–




new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join