It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DOJ says Matthew Whitaker can serve as acting attorney general

page: 3
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:43 PM
link   
Lets be honest here.. Democrats hate Whitaker because he actually has the balls and gusto to go after the Democrats for their illegal activities during the election and after.

Its that simple...

You can pretend all you want Whitaker isn't allowed to be there, but the DOJ approved it and the democrats are crying foul because they know its bad news for them.

Once again, trump wins and the lefties cry

Its a beautiful day..




posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 09:34 PM
link   
Oa reply to: Agit8dChop

A perfect spot on analysis.



posted on Nov, 17 2018 @ 10:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
If Lisa Page's and Peter Strzok's personal opinions of Trump disqualified them from the investigation, then Matthew Whitaker's public outspoken opinions on the national media stage should disqualify him.


Wait, wait, wait! I think you might be comparing apples to, well, oranges here (no pins intended). In one instance you have people who are directly involved in an investigation of an opposition member, who are purportedly using their influence and bias to allow said opposition member to skirt around the laws. Very clear conflict of interest.

In the other case you have someone who has an opinion on the current climate of the media. One does not equal the other. The media isnt being charged with anything , unless I missed it. They aren't being investigated, though they likely should be. Thus there is no conflict of interest there. Now if the whole media industry was being investigated, then and only then, would you have reason to use that comparison.



new topics
 
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join