It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

what's in the box!

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   
I don't know about you guys, but when I am told not to do something, I want to do it even moar! I know a lot of people like that too, I kinda thought it was human nature.

The more trump threatens about his bank account (Mad Maxine is going after that), his taxes (you know, Muller), and the like (let's call Cohen on this one). The more I want to know what's what. I gotta know what he's hiding! It's obvious he's hiding something at this point (that's anecdotal!).

At this point though, it's not going to matter!!! That's the thing that drives me nuts. He's teflon. I know it. You know it.*
*I'll concede to my lefty brothers and sisters we have a slim chance of seeing some kind of justice, but it's very thin.

So what the flocks in there!?!
None of my business?
- point
Triggered/trollololol?
- point
The president doesn't HAVE to show his taxes!
- point
I don't care now!

Could it be:
Evidence of trump being, actually being, a fraud in some way?
- there was some story a bit ago about daddy giving him everything and him squandering it, he didn't earn a dime of his fortune.
- maybe he's really just a dirty single digit millionaire? fits the whole squandering part above.
Evidence of actual fraud?
- dude's been sued a lot
- dude's been in some shady business
- dude's gone bankrupt a lot
Evidence of money laundering? (This is the sexiest one in my eyes)
- cmon! You know. Russia SHHHH! You'll wake up cnbc!
Evidence of active connections to organized criminal enterprises!?! What!?
- (oh man, that's my civil war 2.0 right there. I fantasize about that all the time.)
- I really don't have any corroborating evidence on this one, just can't put it past this guy.
Evidence of Melania being an illegal alien?
- This is a stretch, bear with me
- Some kind of record of payment dated to a time she was on a B-2 visa or something. (and there are rumors about this)
- Really stretching it, maybe one for Ivana too.
- It's getting thinner, but these would put some of the kids citizenship at risk.

I dunno, my monies on money laundering, and I'll double down on not a thing changing,
What do you guys think?
Seriously, what do you guys think. What's in the finances he REALLY doesn't want us to see?
edit on 11/14/2018 by whargoul because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 12:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: whargoul

Seriously, what do you guys think. What's in the finances he REALLY doesn't want us to see?



2.3 million dollars in federally subsidized spray tans.
🔅🔆🔅



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 12:32 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

Did you feel the same way about Obamas long form birth certificate? Why didnt he just show that?

Or how about his college records.

I mean surely you must have thought Obama did something shady to not just immediately show them?

Are you one of the people that thinks only people with something to hide demand the right to privacy?



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 12:33 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

lol!



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 12:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: whargoul

Did you feel the same way about Obamas long form birth certificate? Why didnt he just show that?


I felt it was fully vetted. How did you feel about ken starr ruining that good man's carrier for nothing less than a bj?



Or how about his college records.


Sorry, you got me there, I don't do alex and rush.



I mean surely you must have thought Obama did something shady to not just immediately show them?


Like I said, I think he did show his birth certificate, It might not have met your standards, but it certainly met someone's standards.

But you want to talk about shady, I could talk about shady. I got a lot to say about Obama's shady *snip. We should start a new thread on that though. Hope and Change my butt.



Are you one of the people that thinks only people with something to hide demand the right to privacy?



I'm all for privacy, but that is a right superseded by reasonable suspicion. You lose that right when you are under investigation for a crime. And he is involved in a few investigation.

Way to bring it down man.

Let's stay on track here:
I'm one of those people that when you tell me not to do something, I want to do it even moar!
Surely some of you are too?
We know there will be no repercussions on anything revealed from any investigation.
What's in the box!

What do you think it could be Grambler?
edit on 11/14/2018 by whargoul because: (no reason given)

edit on 11/14/2018 by whargoul because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 12:56 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

First, I was entirely against impeaching clinton over a consensual sexual encounter.

Absolutely against it.

Second, I dont really have an opinion on obamas birth certificate or college records. Suffice it to say many werent satisfied.

So your standard is if you arent satisfied, its worthy of investigation, but if others arent, then its not?

As far as what I think is in trumps tax reurns and such.

Who knows?

I bet if I had tio guess I would say that a thorough look into trumps finances and history would reveal roughly the same number of shadiness that a simialr investigation into almost every washington politician or lawyer would show.

Curious that only trump needs to have all of these investigations into him



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 01:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: whargoul

So your standard is if you arent satisfied, its worthy of investigation, but if others arent, then its not?



I don't know where you get this.
He is under investigation, he has lost some right to privacy. If you mean he still has full rights to privacy with me, then ya.

It's in the OP "It's none of your business" is a very valid reply. You didn't have to beat around the bush.

Thank you for participating though. I think your president might be another level of scammer past the regular DC crew. I think it's his calling. But, that's a good and valid entry!



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

What investigation is he under that justifies seeing the things you are asking?

Hillary was under investigation, did that mean you felt the public was entitled to see all of her finaicial records as well?

Im sure there is all sorts of interesting things in her and her husband and foundations books.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 01:16 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul




What's in the finances he REALLY doesn't want us to see?



Probably the same thing that was in Obama's College records that he didn't want us to see.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 01:22 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul




I'll concede to my lefty brothers and sisters we have a slim chance of seeing some kind of justice, but it's very thin.





posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 02:11 AM
link   
I might have agreed on some point til i got to the dreaming about civil war part. Are you REALLY prepared to put a bullet in someone over their political leanings? Maybe google some real civil war photos.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 03:20 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

I think everything will be aboveboard. I think he's just withholding it all to wind up the left and the MSM. It will be like that moron Maddow 's exclusive tax exposure, a big nothing. With business all around the world, with different laws, customs and mores to do deals, he has to be clean.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 03:23 AM
link   

edit on 14-11-2018 by szino9 because: meh, it wasnt that funny



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 07:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bramble Iceshimmer
a reply to: whargoul

I think everything will be aboveboard. I think he's just withholding it all to wind up the left and the MSM. It will be like that moron Maddow 's exclusive tax exposure, a big nothing. With business all around the world, with different laws, customs and mores to do deals, he has to be clean.


That is a very valid answer. You are right too, it would kind of be the ultimate troll.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: lakenheath24
I might have agreed on some point til i got to the dreaming about civil war part. Are you REALLY prepared to put a bullet in someone over their political leanings? Maybe google some real civil war photos.


You miss understood that part. I probably could have been more eloquent. I read comments about civil war 2.0 almost daily lately, and I have the same reaction you just did.

In that statement I am fantasizing about trump having an active mob connection.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: whargoul




What's in the finances he REALLY doesn't want us to see?



Probably the same thing that was in Obama's College records that he didn't want us to see.


Thanks for playing.

That's not really a financial record, and is in fact a deflection.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Star for you sir. Stuck in my head all day now.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: whargoul

What investigation is he under that justifies seeing the things you are asking?


Cmon! Mueller at the least, Mad Maxine has started talking about investigating the banks (specifically one of his). Deutsche Bank, apparently he had a lot of dealings with Deutsche Bank after his many bankruptcies. Mad Maxine specifically called them out for investigation recently.



Hillary was under investigation, did that mean you felt the public was entitled to see all of her financial records as well?


Were her finances under investigation? This is kind of a deflection bro, you're better than that.



Im sure there is all sorts of interesting things in her and her husband and foundations books.


I bet there are, wanna start a thread about it? I'll participate! I'm not a big fan of hers either, but as far as I know she's not currently under investigation. Would I be upset if you were curious? NOPE.

She also didn't make bold public threats against anyone investigating her, so she didn't pique my interest as much as trump has. I mean he literally stated that if anyone (I believe it was just "the democrats") would investigate his finances it would mean war. THAT kinda rhetoric makes me very curious.
edit on 11/14/2018 by whargoul because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

Muellers investigation has nothing to do with trumps finances. Muellers investigation is an extension of Comeys russia investigation, and looking at possible obstruction of justice.

Trump was repeatedly told by comey he is not a target of the russia investigation.

As far as maxine, so what, she is a partisan hack threatening an investigation. So if any republican threatens an investigation into the finances of any dem, will you also make a thread similar want to see that dems records?

The problem is you are coming off as very one sided and pro establishment to me.

IF an establishment person demands an investigation into someone, now you are interested in what in private finaicial records.

But as for the overwhelming majority of the establishment people themselves that wont call for an investigation of themselves, you see know reason to question their finances.



posted on Nov, 14 2018 @ 08:22 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

None of your business. That's what in his "box": bank account, taxes.

Prepare to be disappointed as usual of late, being on the left. Perhaps if you all throw some more turds one will stick this time... Or you will all be exposed for the reasons your kind shouldn't make decisions.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join