It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The theory also states that the faster an object is moving, the more mass it gains
If gravity were the main force that holds our galaxy or even solar system in tact and it couldn't travel faster than the speed of light, how does it stay in the shape that it does. For the perfectly formed galaxies to retain their shape and space, there would need to be a force in the universe that is instantaneous or as close to that to make the deviation meaningless.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: ClovenSky
If photons were classical particles, ..., but photons are not classical particles. They are quantum particles existing as a wave-particle duality. Theoretically, before a photon is measured, it exists as cloud of probabilistic positions and states. Once observation is made, then the photon takes a position. This is related to the probabilistic law of entropy and entanglement. So the light from a galaxy 52,000 light years away may not have needed to travel that entire distance to reach us. It could have just as easily 'teleported' here.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
In the Theory of Relativity, space and time (or at least how we experience space and time) are dependent on the observer's frame of reference. If you're traveling parallel to a car, and both you and the car are moving at 45 mph, relative to you, the car is not moving; yet relative to a "stationary" viewer, both you and the car are moving.
The theory also states that the faster an object is moving, the more mass it gains, and the slower time seems to pass in that frame. At first, this seemed unintuitive for me, but it gradually started to make good sense.
Lately, I've been getting these overwhelming swells of intuition telling me that distance and duration are not what they seem to be. I feel there is no actual distance between points A, B, and C, there is only entanglement. If points A, B, and C exist on a line, then A is no further from C than it is from B. Instead, A has a stronger entanglement with B than it does with C, which creates the illusion that A is closer to B than it is to C. I feel that everything is in a complex state of superposition. There is no position or momentum, just different degrees of Quantum Coherence.
I've been playing with this idea for a while now--ever since I started getting into Simulation Theory and the Holographic Principle; but it really began to solidify over the past few days after I had this dream that I can only describe as a 4D+ fractal zoom (see the video below for a rough analogy).
Everything is indeed interconnected, but not all things are equally interconnected. If reality was universally symmetrical, there would be no reality to speak of.