Does this "continued vote counting" in some states reek of voter fraud or what?!

a reply to: Sillyolme

Ifsorry this site is becoming almost unusable

a reply to: Sillyolme

Tp

a reply to: Sillyolme

Qp

a reply to: Aallanon

WRONG

You might as well pretend that the election laws don't exist.

Miami-Dade County rejected ballots not received by the mandatory cutoff time.

ganjoa

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Of course its fraud.
Its always paper ballots.
Its always "ballots found insert location here"
It's always more democrat votes.

a reply to: Aallanon

no we just cut it off when the republican is ahead lol
They are just going to have to do a recount anyway.
If theres a time frame someone needs to take their time machine back to 2000 and the Gore / Bush election because they were still counting in december.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
"All votes must be counted."

So that would include dead voters, illegal voters, voters that voted twice, and ballots that are simply made up.

Yeah, Banana Republic.

Let's just ignore the ridiculous.

Bull.

Crap.

You're embracing it.

Look in a mirror, buddy.

Certain people on Fox News and in the GOP started screeching once they realized they might not pull off quite as many Senate seats as they anticipated.

They are trying to cast doubt on the legitimacy of an election because they are losing. They don't give a crap about the Constitution. They don't give a crap about laws. They don't give a crap about your vote.

All they care about is power.

There is no evidence of electoral fraud. There is only whining. Grow the hell up.

a reply to: Sillyolme

That’s why the laws were enacted but now you don’t like it.

Boo Hoo

a reply to: Greven

Lol

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

No.

Not like that would ever happen either. Democrats have a lock on this.


Enjoy it, you're "party" gets to create the votes, gets to count the votes, gets to name the "winner". It appeases the masses into giving them the illusion that they get to participate in the voting process.

I know what side of the fence you are on.

If it was the GOP being accused, your "story" would be different.

If the GOP refused to allow observation and inspection of the count and refused to provide even a total number of ballots they hold, I would hope everyone would think that was outrageous.

If you, Annee, were in charge in Broward, why would you refuse to allow inspection according to the law? If a judge sent an order personally naming you, Annee, "you must obey this law and allow inspection and provide total numbers", what would make you ignore it? Under what circumstances would you personally say, "# the law and that judge, I'm not allowing observers or inspection. I'd rather be held in contempt and break the law" ?

Certainly not just for fun, I'd hope.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
"All votes must be counted."

So that would include dead voters, illegal voters, voters that voted twice, and ballots that are simply made up.

Yeah, Banana Republic.

Let's just ignore the ridiculous.

Bull.

Crap.

You're embracing it.

A star was not enough for this post,these are for you

I will bake you some cookies later.Love,Mama

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Of course its fraud.
Its always paper ballots.
Its always "ballots found insert location here"
It's always more democrat votes.

Oh, so you would prefer electronic votes which can be altered at the whim of liberals who are more college-educated and much more savvy about technology?

No thanks.

a reply to: ganjoa

the cut off was for receipt of ballots not counting of votes.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Wrong

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

No.

Not like that would ever happen either. Democrats have a lock on this.


Enjoy it, you're "party" gets to create the votes, gets to count the votes, gets to name the "winner". It appeases the masses into giving them the illusion that they get to participate in the voting process.

I know what side of the fence you are on.

If it was the GOP being accused, your "story" would be different.

No.

You're wrong again. Because the law is the law and I would abide by it regardless of the outcome.

I don't base the law on how it would benefit me.

Look, I'm conceding.

You and your "party" are the better cheaters. You and your party will gain power by hook or by crook. It doesn't matter.


Sometimes a person just has to accept the fact that the bad guys win, cheaters prosper, and the corrupt get to be in charge.


It's refreshing actually. Because the "rules" have changed, thanks to "your" party.


The rule of law doesn't really matter now. It's whomever is in charge is what matters.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Greven

Lol

Where was the screeching before November 8th?

The election happened on November 6th.

a reply to: Greven

I prefer that over magically finding boxes of ballots that run 90% Democrat.

a reply to: Greven

Generally I wait until someone breaks the law before I shout CRIME.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

No.

Not like that would ever happen either. Democrats have a lock on this.


Enjoy it, you're "party" gets to create the votes, gets to count the votes, gets to name the "winner". It appeases the masses into giving them the illusion that they get to participate in the voting process.

I know what side of the fence you are on.

If it was the GOP being accused, your "story" would be different.

No.

You're wrong again. Because the law is the law and I would abide by it regardless of the outcome.

I don't base the law on how it would benefit me.

Look, I'm conceding.

You and your "party" are the better cheaters. You and your party will gain power by hook or by crook. It doesn't matter.


Sometimes a person just has to accept the fact that the bad guys win, cheaters prosper, and the corrupt get to be in charge.


It's refreshing actually. Because the "rules" have changed, thanks to "your" party.


The rule of law doesn't really matter now. It's whomever is in charge is what matters.

About time you submitted to Mob Rule.
What took you so long?