It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
See my post above. Tons of white people in me back then. Not that it matters.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Well this went exactly as expected.
Obviously, he was the only white man in the middle east.
Actually, he didn't exist so he's whatever color you imagine him to be.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: DBCowboy
Haha...I stepped into that dookie didn't I?
Seriously, though, obviously the Roman guards authorities were clueless and needed Judas to point him out. One can only assume that any and all given description was not good enough to nail him to a cross.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: CosmicEyes
It doesn't matter what he looked like...
we actually have no idea anyways...
he could have been pokadot…
Though he certainly wasn't the dude we see everywhere
originally posted by: CosmicEyes
How many white men have hair like Wool?
And for anyone unfamiliar with metals, the colour of Brass is brown, and if burned in a furnace, it would be a darker brown. /quote]
1. People of historically Jewish decent often have thick hair that one could say resembles wool. The same could be said of anyone who spent 40 days and nights in the wilderness
2. Anyone unfamiliar with what happens after spending a month in the sun? Ok...you tan. What color do people who can tan get? Often a dark bronze.
The images we have of Jesus are from the middle ages and based off royalty. The images are wrong. That doesn't mean Jesus was a black man or a white man.
Long story short, Jesus was a Jew.
Stop trying to steal from the Jews!
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: CosmicEyes
White Jesus give me a break!
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: sunkuong
Actually images of Jesus date right back to the first century and the earliest ones do show a darker skinned image than the European images of later time's, this is mostly down to people painting only what they know.
One of these is a probably early third century graffiti from Rome mocking early Christians with a figure of a sheep headed man crucified.
www.challies.com...
churchpop.com...
www.ibtimes.co.uk...
Personally I believe the Turin shroud is real and it therefore is the earliest image of Christ and not made by human hand's so exempt from the old testament law.
originally posted by: CosmicEyes
[Revelation, Chapter 1, Verse 14]
"His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire, And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace"
How many white men have hair like Wool?
And for anyone unfamiliar with metals, the colour of Brass is brown, and if burned in a furnace, it would be a darker brown.
Yet when you walk into any church in America or England (My Country), you see images of a WHITE Jesus.
Every biblical figure in church imagery, movies, paintings, is always portrayed as white, even though the region where Christ came from was a region where the people had colour. There were no white people in Egypt, Babylon or Palestine (Modern day occupation by Israel). In those regions, the people were of colour.
One of the great tragedies has been, that over the last 400 years Europeans and white Americans have created an ideology of white supremacy and they have in the process taken the sacred images and made them white and have re-cast black into a negative image.
History has been whitewashed, as the image of Jesus was hijacked by the white establishment over the generations, and it comes with the insidious notion that white people are to be obeyed, respected and looked up to.
Its important from a historical perspective that we all set the record straight so that the black family can reclaim much of their true history which has been neglected, ignored or destroyed.
The average child needs to be instructed on this matter, not just young black children but the average white kid in Europe or America is as misinformed and miseducated as the average black person as to the historical accuracy of Christ.
There are over 100 references to Egypt in the Bible, over 50 references to Biblical Ethiopia (Present day Sudan) both OT and NT. Bible scholars, most of whom were white, have translated and interpreted, in a way that would be distinctly favourable to Europe, and a way that would be distinctly UN-favorable to Blacks and people of colour.
The fact is Jesus has been portrayed for 2,000 years as a Caucasian European when in fact he was a man of colour, along with many more key figures in the biblical history.
It's not enough to say, we are all God's children, if you continue to present Jesus as a white man to children of colour all over the world, they grow up somehow believing, way down inside, the ridiculous notion that white is better.
And it's a tragedy that Europe, America and the higher education system continuously uses the politics of race to present distorted information which has worked against black people and for white people.
This needs to be corrected and updated for the betterment of ALL mankind.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: grey580
Turned in to quite a ruff area since Jesus time.