It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Boadicea
However, I'd like to think the WH would have much better sources too. Infowars? SMH.
The White House uses whatever sources paint their actions in a positive light. The truth doesn’t mean anything to these people.
originally posted by: knoxie
it's boggles my mind you all are ok with the white house releasing a doctored video..
i wonder what his legal rights are regarding this.
I am sorry but the way CNN reporter was behaving was completely unprofessional.
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: knoxie
it's boggles my mind you all are ok with the white house releasing a doctored video..
i wonder what his legal rights are regarding this.
Did you watch the Watson video?
If you mean doctored as in zoomed in on and compressed, fine it was doctored.
Yes any normal person is fine with them using that video.
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: proximo
It's quite sad when you really think about it. The mental gymnastics and reach required to go from "innocent arm gesture" to "aggressive karate-chop" after watching 2 videos that are virtually identical, is truly mind-boggling.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: AboveBoard
Technically it was not
Oh
Who else has been suspended?
Prediction: attacks on the Press and individual journalists will increase in the very near future.
We can revisit this then. If I’m wrong I will admit it. Will you admit to being wrong that there’s “nothing to see here” when that becomes apparent?
Simple common sense says Watson is telling the truth, the video was simply zoomed in and uploaded three different times which causes compression and slightly modified the video.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Why does it always have to be News? Why can't it be Olds?