It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: shawncgraham
Many of us have researched the evidence as well, and come up with the opposite view. As I said previously, I think a multi-disciplinary approach within the sciences is much needed.
originally posted by: sapien82
despite our scientists best efforts to document and combat climate change, it seems there is no real great effort by all industries to really clamp down on environmental impact, because they will lose to much money and that is bad for business so until our global mindset changes and we put planet before profit its only going to get a lot worse , and when our natural habitats go , we go , and Id rather all those selfish #s were fired into the sun than keep going the way we are
originally posted by: shawncgraham
a reply to: 727Sky
Poor polar bears! Their population is the bigest since the 1950s!
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: InTheLight
The role of common everyday clouds is not understood yet incredibly complex awesome forecasts of destruction are for sure on the right track?
This is the kind of science that is as useless as religions are for telling us what God is.
"We are aware the way we handled the errors underestimated the uncertainties. We are working on an update that addresses this issue. We thank Nicholas Lewis for bringing this to our attention." (from resplandy.princeton.edu... ).