'Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either...'

a reply to: blueman12

Why does he need to in order to wear the label of moderate?

For someone on the right, he is moderate.

When you read that word, I think you are thinking we mean centrist or something.

a reply to: blueman12

That's because all too many of us, allow our selves to be lead around by the nose.

Just as you're allowing yourself to believe that I'm some sort of Fox news fan-boi, or other...simply because my opinions may in some way agree with his...in others, they don't. Oops.

Hate to break this to you, but I've been making up my own mind on things for some little time now. Accusations of doing otherwise, not withstanding.

a reply to: ketsuko

Some on the right, as well.

It's the extremist's on both that are going to trigger any kerfuffle that comes along. Not those of us in the middle, or shading in that direction...

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: blueman12

Did they have people show up at their house? Did they have groups show up while they were out eating with their families?

Or did people just call and email saying mean things because I guarantee you that happens to personalities on both sides and lawmakers on both sides. Not excusing it, but trying to equate the mean messages with angry mobs on your lawn or in your face while you are out in public is pretty weak.

I agree that it happens to both sides, as clearly shown here. However, an entire thread is dedicated (as usually) to the republican side of things. Pretending that republicans are all being attacked by crazy democrats. While ignoring any republican supporter misbehavior.


I just can't take these threads seriously when they ignore the other side.

a reply to: blueman12

majority of these threads do not reflect real life and are also not connected to reality

It's just sad what things are coming to. Divided we fall.

Amen to that

But are we supposed to compromise our very ideals to avoid it?

I'm not willing to sacrifice the Constitution (or budge a single inch on Constitutional rights) for any reason, but we need not do that to co-exist.

Non-interference is the only real way forward, save for outright civil war. But the second someone gets the stupid # idea to try to force their stupid # agenda on others, we'll be right back at square one. We need a government as constrained as the one in 1776 but with many more explicitly defined and ironclad specifications that the Constitution does not limit the Rights of Citizens, it constrains government by permitting ONLY THOSE ACTIONS specifically permitted to it by the same

a reply to: blueman12

Who is ignoring their own side, really?

Some of us are sick of hearing the left screech about every "ism" in the book while ignoring the ANTIFA soy boy cowards and pretending socialism is anything but a proven failed ideology

We don't want socialism! We don't want communism! We don't want big government! Understand that by advocating for those things you are also advocating violence against those of us who will resist any such patently illegal attempt to subvert our Constitutional Republic.

a reply to: seagull

In my opinion, he is a pseudo journalist. Presenting views and attempting to persuade his audience with a passion. Yet, providing very little material. And his persusian always has an end-goal before the journey begins. (As most MSM hosts)

Whereas, a real journalist, such as Abbey Martin, shows the events happening, this history, both sides and then leads with an opinion without a large mainstream agenda behind it. Such as her multiple videos in venezuala that go against many of the MSM narratives (both left and right).

For example:


Whereas, tucker carlson, justt unloads opinion after opinion, attempting to persaude his audience to an ever-looming republican outlook.

Why is our country so divided? It's because you rely on the tucker carlsons, or the CNN pundits to fill up your mind. You say you're not a fan boi or sheep? Then why do you need tucker carlson if you already have your opinion?

Don't mean to soley focus on you Seagull, just trying to question why we need these pundits who just confirm our bias?

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: blueman12

Who is ignoring their own side, really?

Some of us are sick of hearing the left screech about every "ism" in the book while ignoring the ANTIFA soy boy cowards and pretending socialism is anything but a proven failed ideology

We don't want socialism! We don't want communism! We don't want big government! Understand that by advocating for those things you are also advocating violence against those of us who will resist any such patently illegal attempt to subvert our Constitutional Republic.

First of all, you can't just have capatalism reign freely. You need government to step in and sometimes help out (socialism). You act like we have to choose between complete socialism or corporated-controlled politician capatalism..

Ignoring antifa? Why do they matter? They are an extreme minority that nobody supports. Wait what? You said I'm advocating for violence?

Get your head together man! I question republicans and now im a liberal communist (antifa supporter?) that wants to overthrow the consitution and advocate violence?

Soy boy? I keep hearing that

So I guess all the vegan body builders are just secretly "soy boi" beta-males that need safe-spaces? Do you think before you spout off these dopey new catch phrases?

EDIT: okay that is way off topic, but I keep reading that phrase online and I don't get it.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Bloodworth

Which solves what, exactly??

Violence in response to violence has worked wonders all over the world, hasn't it?

Middle East, bastions of peace there, right?

The European seem to have finally, maybe, learned that lesson. It only took two major world wars, and the Napoleonic Wars to figure that out... How many millions died?

...and that's what you want here? Really? Do your children? Your parents? I'd just as soon not have a civil war here, thanks. We're still dealing with the left overs of the last one, over a century ago.

It will send a message that groups like antifa who dress in body armor will not be tolerated.

Groups who block public roads will not be tolerated

Groups who show up to a persons home and scream threats will not be tolerated.

I would add groups who call for the killing of police, but the police seem to be ordered to protect those groups.

So how would you suggest we deal with these violent groups?

Problem with division is. Right now in the u.s. there are almost more people who want to see foreign countries be taken care of before America citizens.

Because there is a large population who have more interest and family elsewhere. And they clearly want a global cause before an American one.

Also big divison will come from tax payers and tax users.

What Democrats dont understand is that there are more people who will never contribute a penny to healthcare or taxes then those who do contribute.

In ny many schools have an average of five students in a classroom of 25 who have parents who contribute to school tax.

More people are coming in to use taxed based services. Less are contributing. Causes a rise in taxes and anger among the few who contribute

More people in the u.s. now who drive on roads and bridges then those who contribute to the taxes that pay for the maintenance

The results are poor infrastructure. Money going elsewhere, before updating water pipes for the citizens health.

This will get the citizens upset.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: ketsuko

Some on the right, as well.

It's the extremist's on both that are going to trigger any kerfuffle that comes along. Not those of us in the middle, or shading in that direction...

there is no more middle. Time to choose a side.
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

One side consists of antifa, BLM, LGBTQ, illegal aliens, muslims and hollyweird actors

The other side holds American flags.

And the past elections just told the world what side the majority of the country sides with.

The past election also psyched up those who want to attack the u.s.

Liberals are much more naive and easier to manipulate.

Muslims and liberals have completely opposite views on womens rights, gay rights, and religious freedom.
But muslims know liberals are much weaker to take advantage of. They use liberalism as a tool to further their cause.

originally posted by: Bloodworth

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: ketsuko

Some on the right, as well.

It's the extremist's on both that are going to trigger any kerfuffle that comes along. Not those of us in the middle, or shading in that direction...

there is no more middle. Time to choose a side.
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

One side consists of antifa, BLM, LGBTQ, illegal aliens, muslims and hollyweird actors

The other side holds American flags.

And the past elections just told the world what side the majority of the country sides with.

The past election also psyched up those who want to attack the u.s.

Liberals are much more naive and easier to manipulate.

Muslims and liberals have completely opposite views on womens rights, gay rights, and religious freedom.
But muslims know liberals are much weaker to take advantage of. They use liberalism as a tool to further their cause.

lol. Watch alex jones and fox news much? Gotta choose a side and go to war huh? Glad you got brainwashed... Enjoy the kool aid.

O yea .. Soon you'll be overrun with LGBTQ, muslims, migrants, snowflake safe-spacers, and outspoken Hollywood actors on your lawn..


Better hurry up. Get your guns, survival food and bunker ready.


Now time to start a gun and survival online shop. $$$

I am thinking bear spray might be a good addition to keep these pests away when they herd up.

originally posted by: loam

Smash Racism DC just deleted the original video and now is only showing one with a more benign chant.

It's charming when a country's residents don't want the country to exist. The word "patriot" does most certainly not come to mind.

Brainwashed, gullible idiots.

originally posted by: blueman12

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: blueman12

Did they have people show up at their house? Did they have groups show up while they were out eating with their families?

Or did people just call and email saying mean things because I guarantee you that happens to personalities on both sides and lawmakers on both sides. Not excusing it, but trying to equate the mean messages with angry mobs on your lawn or in your face while you are out in public is pretty weak.

I agree that it happens to both sides, as clearly shown here. However, an entire thread is dedicated (as usually) to the republican side of things. Pretending that republicans are all being attacked by crazy democrats. While ignoring any republican supporter misbehavior.


I just can't take these threads seriously when they ignore the other side.

What other side? What republican governor is telling police to stand down and let armed masked mass mobs run lawless through the streets? What republican is telling a democrat that they can't eat at their restaurant, and then following them into another restaurant and harassing the owner to stop them from eating? What republican is stealing prodemocrat hats and hitting children and the elderly?

What leftist speaker is having to pay massive sums in security because of vast protests emerging to block them from speaking?

There are a few lone loons on the right, but the left has a massive amount of individuals who take to streets masked to engage in terrorist activities.

originally posted by: Uberdoubter

originally posted by: loam

Smash Racism DC just deleted the original video and now is only showing one with a more benign chant.

It's charming when a country's residents don't want the country to exist. The word "patriot" does most certainly not come to mind.

Brainwashed, gullible idiots.

Very stupid ignorant people. They don't understand a country has limited resources. When you lock your door and don't invite a few thousand homeless people in, it is not because you're a cold heartless bastard, it is because there ain't the resources or space for them.

They think we can open the borders and let in hundreds of millions if not billions and resources will just come magically pouring out of the sky.

a reply to: Xenogears


You mean like the far-right wing failed pipe bomber ?


So a small amount of individuals are going to summarize the whole of the democratic party? Well, in the case, lets just shove all republicans into neo-nazis or confederacy-touting racists?


So where is all this left-wing terrorism?

originally posted by: blueman12

originally posted by: Bloodworth

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: ketsuko

Some on the right, as well.

It's the extremist's on both that are going to trigger any kerfuffle that comes along. Not those of us in the middle, or shading in that direction...

there is no more middle. Time to choose a side.
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

One side consists of antifa, BLM, LGBTQ, illegal aliens, muslims and hollyweird actors

The other side holds American flags.

And the past elections just told the world what side the majority of the country sides with.

The past election also psyched up those who want to attack the u.s.

Liberals are much more naive and easier to manipulate.

Muslims and liberals have completely opposite views on womens rights, gay rights, and religious freedom.
But muslims know liberals are much weaker to take advantage of. They use liberalism as a tool to further their cause.

lol. Watch alex jones and fox news much? Gotta choose a side and go to war huh? Glad you got brainwashed... Enjoy the kool aid.

O yea .. Soon you'll be overrun with LGBTQ, muslims, migrants, snowflake safe-spacers, and outspoken Hollywood actors on your lawn..


Better hurry up. Get your guns, survival food and bunker ready.


Now time to start a gun and survival online shop. $$$

Guns are no longer used to overrun modern countries.
The enemy learned not to long ago that traditional weapons are useless.
There are more subtle and out of the box methods used.
It's funny when you hear naive liberals claim the caravan is not dangerous. No violent threat.

good or bad their sheer numbers will do more damage then any weapon.

Liberals will ignore over population, lack of jobs. Lack of resources, lack of space in schools.



Too many , too fast never a good combo.

First non English speaking group where the country had to translate for them. Too many , too fast to properly assimilate.

Many other foreign speakers who worked hard to learn English are upset. Things were not made as easy for them.

a reply to: Xenogears


Some people just disagree with the president calling them invaders full of criminals who want to abuse the country.


It's a shame that the president can barely even defend his catchphrases, or his supporters for that matter. Yes, there is laws to follow and a process.

However, trump is using this caravan and wall to unite people under the guise of migrants being the #1 problem and enemy in this country.. Pulling hundreds of troops as some political stunt before the mid-term elections.

Few are advocating to just freely let them in. Many are disagreeing with how the president is leading the country under fear and paranoia.

Sounds like ratings ploy from Fox news. Any Craig's list ads lately for young 20-something actors?