It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Jr. expects to be indicted soon.

page: 1
8
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Two days ago it was reported that West Wing insiders are preparing for the delivery of Mueller's report extremely soon, even as early as today. The expectation is that Mueller has a solid perjury case against the younger Trump. Also, he has apparently been confiding in friends that he expects it to happen soon.


Two days ago, Gabriel Sherman reported that White House officials are concerned about Donald Jr. “I’m very worried about Don Jr.,” a former West Wing official told Sherman, who fears Mueller will be able to prove perjury. Deep in a report about Trump’s 2020 campaign plans, Politico drops the news this morning that Trump Jr. “has told friends in recent weeks that he believes he could be indicted.”


LINK




posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Crap source. It sources from both Politico and Vanity fair.

However, considering the probe, it was long assumed Jr might be indicated considering the players. Either or, it isn't indicative of anything and with the recent removal of Sessions, we shall see what becomes of this.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:24 PM
link   
The question becomes would Trump supporters be onboard with the suspension of the legal process to protect Don Jnr from potential prosecution...

I rather suspect they would.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:26 PM
link   
Obvious Lefty foaming at the mouth hit peice.
Try again.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlackJackal
Two days ago it was reported that West Wing insiders are preparing for the delivery of Mueller's report extremely soon, even as early as today. The expectation is that Mueller has a solid perjury case against the younger Trump. Also, he has apparently been confiding in friends that he expects it to happen soon.


Two days ago, Gabriel Sherman reported that White House officials are concerned about Donald Jr. “I’m very worried about Don Jr.,” a former West Wing official told Sherman, who fears Mueller will be able to prove perjury. Deep in a report about Trump’s 2020 campaign plans, Politico drops the news this morning that Trump Jr. “has told friends in recent weeks that he believes he could be indicted.”


LINK




LOL....let's see how this thread ages....



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Painterz

Are you on board with prosecuting Clinton?

If Jr lied to hide crimes prosecute him.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal

Man you have been hammering the republicans lately...



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal

So another process crime?
Mkay
If we go down that path there will be many former dc residents lined up for "perjury".
You know "wipe it with a cloth or something".
A lot of people have testified "under oath" in the last 5 or so years, what is the statute of limitations on "perjury" again?

If that is what the indictment is for is it really worth the fallout?



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
Crap source. It sources from both Politico and Vanity fair.

However, considering the probe, it was long assumed Jr might be indicated considering the players. Either or, it isn't indicative of anything and with the recent removal of Sessions, we shall see what becomes of this.


I have a question for you. Let's say that Trump Jr did lie under oath hypothetically. Should he be prosecuted or should he be left alone?



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal


Last year, Donald Trump Jr. testified that he never informed his father of a meeting with Russian officials promising “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.


What law is being broken here such that your fantasy is going to become reality?

Don't do your usual and deflect, just give me the EXACT US CODE that the indictment will cover.

Standing by.....



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal

So, Dems take the House and
Sessions takes his leave and
Mueller had promised that stuff was coming soon after the election and
now this rumor about Jr.

Could be Trump will soon be at Def-con 5. How long will his addled brain be able to walk the tightrope before it turns into a noose.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal




I have a question for you. Let's say that Trump Jr did lie under oath hypothetically. Should he be prosecuted or should he be left alone?

You really want to go down that road with the government?
So then ford, avenatti, clinton, comey, and all the others that have testified under oath will be held to the same standard?



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal

It depends on what he was asked.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: BlackJackal




I have a question for you. Let's say that Trump Jr did lie under oath hypothetically. Should he be prosecuted or should he be left alone?

You really want to go down that road with the government?
So then ford, avenatti, clinton, comey, and all the others that have testified under oath will be held to the same standard?


In my opinion, yes if they lied under oath they should be prosecuted. It is the law is it not?



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: BlackJackal

So, Dems take the House and
Sessions takes his leave and
Mueller had promised that stuff was coming soon after the election and
now this rumor about Jr.

Could be Trump will soon be at Def-con 5. How long will his addled brain be able to walk the tightrope before it turns into a noose.


The report is reportedly coming soon. Giuliani is supposedly crafting the Trump rebuttal document.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: BlackJackal

It depends on what he was asked.


To be guilty of perjury he would have been asked a direct question and then knowingly told a lie in response.

So, if he did that, should he be prosecuted?



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Did you not read my post at all? The alleged crime is perjury.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:46 PM
link   
heard on the Dan Bonginio show( he read from some article) that a case was moving really fast in the DC court system . That the Trump appointed Judge recused himself

Trump Jr would fit. Might be hoping the Trump goes on the war path and does something illegal.



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackJackal

Again, it depends on what the question was. Mueller has treated this like a dragnet with no direct focus other than identification of ANYTHING remotely prosecutable. That was not the mandate he was given, but the Dems and a handful of Republicans have sheltered him and allowed his farce to continue well beyond "Russian collusion" which Mueller's own team have admitted no evidence of has been found. Therefore, it depends on the question. If Jr lied on a question tied to Russian collusion, then sure, prosecute him. If he lied in response to a question Mueller had no business asking him, then it's entrapment and no, he shouldn't be prosecuted.

(This all makes the HUGE assumption these sources are now, magically accurate after 2 years of BS claims of what's about to happen.)



posted on Nov, 7 2018 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Painterz

Are you on board with prosecuting Clinton?

If Jr lied to hide crimes prosecute him.


Bwahahaha!! She isn't guilty of anything, if she was, she would be in jail of something....... (for real, that is the logic that applies to this)



new topics

top topics



 
8
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join