It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -13-

page: 279
127
<< 276  277  278    280  281  282 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:06 PM
link   
OMG

Did you guys hear what alex jones said this week?





posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   
Q#2525




Worth Remembering: Roberts appointed FISA judges. Roberts was/is compromised.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

Is that a recent thing (can't get twitter to work coz bandwidth)? Asking because:

Navy Admiral Scott Stearney Is Found Dead in Bahrain Home


edit on 2-12-2018 by MindBodySpiritComplex because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: TheOne7

The suspense is killing me...



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

ToL reported that yesterday...like 2 minutes after death. He's a serious kybd warrior!
Have it at the top of my list to track updates.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: TheOne7

Admitting he's a paid shill. IDK, Who cares??



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex
a reply to: liveandlearn

Is that a recent thing (can't get twitter to work coz bandwidth)? Asking because:

Navy Admiral Scott Stearney Is Found Dead in Bahrain Home



Haven't looked into any of the below, yet. Here's what I saved for later.

www.navy.mil...

www.upi.com...

‘C_A Cocaine and Clintons’
The Bahrain link
www.apfn.org...

ROBERT STEELE: I am told he was murdered by Bahreini security services at the request of the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) element attached to the fifth fleet. I have no direct knowledge. My source tells me he was murdered because he explicitly opposed the planned false flag attack in collaboration with the Israeli Navy simulating an Iranian patrol boat missile attack on a US naval vassal.
phibetaiota.net... ian-attack-on-us-naval-vessel/



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:29 PM
link   
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

That was the first visual for me. The sounds of the innocents was/is heartbreaking.
Hopefully US has closed many previously open doors.

Hmmm, think we still have ports where there is no customs check.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheOne7
OMG

Did you guys hear what alex jones said this week?



I don't read fake news



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

There's a small problem with the assessment by the anons that the picture was taken at Chongquing Int'l airport. Anon post 4094568 says Eyes on Plane and has the flight aware info from January?? Nope.

The clue that the anon is wrong is in the picture.



If you look at the sign in the pic, you see that it says H1|03. H1 is the taxiway and 03 is the runway you will be crossing or turning onto. B-1976 is sitting on runway 3.

So how do I know that this is not Chongquing, or Incheon International?

Neither of them have a Taxiway H1.

The maps for Chongquing is here. You'll note that the highest taxiway designation letter-wise is "E".

The map for Incheon International Airport is here. This is a strange layout, and the Taxiways do have letter designations above "H", but not "H". Actually, it skips a bunch of letters, and "H" is one of the letters that didnt make the cut. The map is burried in a bunch of technical info at the link about 15 pages in.

So i'm back to my original assessment. Which is to say that the flight is actually a route between Changchun Longjia Int'l - CGQ, and Shanghai Pudong Int'l - PVG, as it is currently on flight aware.

My first assessment that Changchun Longjia Int'l is too small and doesn't have a taxiway "H" was correct. Map is at the link.

Which leaves me with Shanghai Pudong Int'l , which has a taxiway H1 leading to Runway 3. (Actually I think its runway 3 or 4 depending on which way you turn, but if you turned the other way it would be a pretty short flight.

That's all I have for now.

I think the anon from your screenshot tried to tie things to gether that shouldn't be tied together.



Worth adding: Plane number 1978

Q#1978



Cranky,
The plane number is 1976 but that Q post is interesting.
Also note the plane image filename - "2576" and bottom edge has a thick white pixel line. Thinking Q knows who (8) are onboard and will be revealed in Q post #2576. I think some 'event' has either been foretold or another clue what has already occurred concerning the number 2576.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

That was the first visual for me. The sounds of the innocents was/is heartbreaking.
Hopefully US has closed many previously open doors.

Hmmm, think we still have ports where there is no customs check.


Yep, think decades of refined smuggle routes & bribe pay-outs. I know a few former Navy guys who purposefully retired to SE Asia countries to make a living on Guns/Drugs and/or human smuggling. This was during the 80s-90s. Can't imagine what it must be like today.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Re Q Post #179 - The Mike Green helicopter crash on Rothschilds estate in UK:


This post has had my spidey senses going every time I came across it. I think it's the ONLY post that starts immediately after the post number it replies to - rather than on a new line. I now know why - to distract from the first 2 lines! The II & IV also add camouflage into the CAPS only decode to distract further.

Partial quote:

Shadow war.
Act II, Scene IV.
(Movie idea – thoughts?)
(Characters)
Good guy (pilot of helicopter).
Bad guy (pilot of plane).
Targets (on ground and in home).

(Bolding mine.)

If you take the II & IV out of a CAPS decode you get SASMCGBTSUGBGMEWTQ.

So, bad actors interrupted a white hat op to take someone captive on a Rothshild estate in UK.

The CAPS decode includes SAS and GB (twice). Were the SAS white hats or black hats in this operation?

For me in the UK, this is quite disturbing. Apart from anything else, a school friends' older brother was in the SAS and another brother a brigadier. Any suggestion that SAS were bad actors in this story would hit hard at my belief system.

TSU would be Tactical Small Unit (US DoD)
EWT would be Early Warning Test

ETA - Act 2, Scene 4 gives 24 - publicly, the SAS is split into regiments 21, 22 and 23... is there a secret 24 unit?

ETA2 - note in the anon post Q replies to, there was a "dog grooming event" there at time of crash. McStain/HW referred to as dogs - coincidence? Also in post 641 the youtube has Hillary referring to bringing gangs (MS13) to heel! Does the cabal call their underlings "dog soldiers"?


Yes Dog is a common name for a certain type of soldier.

IE. Big Dog.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:00 PM
link   
It boggles my mind how one-sided the US presidentcy has been:

Reagan, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Obama, Obama....then Clinton again?

That's not democracy.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:05 PM
link   



twitter.com...

This was back when this was Assange's personal account.

He knows stuff that we don't know.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking




He knows stuff that we don't know.


Rushan secrets...




posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: TheOne7

I think it's more like cooking recipes. Of Hillary's.





edit on 2 by tiredoflooking because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: TheOne7

Rushan secrets what?

P ?

That narrative didn't go very far, did it?

What rushan "models" secret or not should be strictly between them and their customers, don't you think?

#ConsentingAdults




posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

There's a small problem with the assessment by the anons that the picture was taken at Chongquing Int'l airport. Anon post 4094568 says Eyes on Plane and has the flight aware info from January?? Nope.

The clue that the anon is wrong is in the picture.



If you look at the sign in the pic, you see that it says H1|03. H1 is the taxiway and 03 is the runway you will be crossing or turning onto. B-1976 is sitting on runway 3.

So how do I know that this is not Chongquing, or Incheon International?

Neither of them have a Taxiway H1.

The maps for Chongquing is here. You'll note that the highest taxiway designation letter-wise is "E".

The map for Incheon International Airport is here. This is a strange layout, and the Taxiways do have letter designations above "H", but not "H". Actually, it skips a bunch of letters, and "H" is one of the letters that didnt make the cut. The map is burried in a bunch of technical info at the link about 15 pages in.

So i'm back to my original assessment. Which is to say that the flight is actually a route between Changchun Longjia Int'l - CGQ, and Shanghai Pudong Int'l - PVG, as it is currently on flight aware.

My first assessment that Changchun Longjia Int'l is too small and doesn't have a taxiway "H" was correct. Map is at the link.

Which leaves me with Shanghai Pudong Int'l , which has a taxiway H1 leading to Runway 3. (Actually I think its runway 3 or 4 depending on which way you turn, but if you turned the other way it would be a pretty short flight.

That's all I have for now.

I think the anon from your screenshot tried to tie things to gether that shouldn't be tied together.



Worth adding: Plane number 1978

Q#1978



Cranky,
The plane number is 1976 but that Q post is interesting.
Also note the plane image filename - "2576" and bottom edge has a thick white pixel line. Thinking Q knows who (8) are onboard and will be revealed in Q post #2576. I think some 'event' has either been foretold or another clue what has already occurred concerning the number 2576.


TY, I added your correction. Bad info + Bad eyes = errors.



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

well if ASSange says so then...

Is this really the dirt you all have on podesta and crew?

I get so many replies saying what about podesta but what really did he do?



posted on Dec, 2 2018 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: TheOne7

Assange just had Podesta's own emails dude.

Give them a read.

I imagine he has more not yet released as well.

To be clear this is a graphic someone created but the original NSA tweet was real.

So don't just take Assange's word for it.





edit on 2 by tiredoflooking because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
127
<< 276  277  278    280  281  282 >>

log in

join