It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: interupt42
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Was Sessions left in place and recused in order to allow certain people to feel comfortable/safe as discovery/indictments went forward?
Interesting turn of events not shocked but as i asked in the session thread
So what happened to trust sessions?
originally posted by: interupt42
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Was Sessions left in place and recused in order to allow certain people to feel comfortable/safe as discovery/indictments went forward?
Interesting turn of events not shocked but as i asked in the session thread
So what happened to trust sessions?
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: interupt42
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Was Sessions left in place and recused in order to allow certain people to feel comfortable/safe as discovery/indictments went forward?
Interesting turn of events not shocked but as i asked in the session thread
So what happened to trust sessions?
It's possible this was Sessions' purpose. The way he resigned the day after the election makes it clear this was planned out in advance. Also, Q+ posted thanking Sessions, so clearly Sessions didn't fall out of favor or anything like that.
Mr. Cohen-Watnick, 31, served briefly at the start of the Trump administration as the senior director for intelligence for the National Security Council, overseeing covert action and other intelligence programs. He was brought on by Michael T. Flynn, President Trump’s first national security adviser. But some former officials criticized Mr. Cohen-Watnick, a former clandestine officer in the Defense Intelligence Agency, as too young for the job, which is usually filled by C.I.A. veterans.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Red Line - anniversary of Red October. Eric Holder is talking about red lines now too, per Q #2459.
They really don't want Mueller reigned in and brought back to scope, do they?
originally posted by: MojaveDesert
Here's Thomas Wictor weighing in on: "Why Matthew G. Whittaker?"
originally posted by: crankyoldman
FISA
FISA
FISA
Brings down the house...
TRUST THE PLAN
originally posted by: ketsuko
Anniversary of Red October 1917
#2457
The long-awaited Constituent Assembly elections were held on 12 November 1917. In contrast to their majority in the Soviets, the Bolsheviks only won 175 seats in the 715-seat legislative body, coming in second behind the Socialist Revolutionary Party, which won 370 seats, although the SR Party no longer existed as a whole party by that time, as the Left SRs had gone into coalition with the Bolsheviks from October 1917 to March 1918. The Constituent Assembly was to first meet on 28 November 1917, but its convocation was delayed until 5 January 1918 by the Bolsheviks. On its first and only day in session, the Constituent Assembly came into conflict with the Soviets, and it rejected Soviet decrees on peace and land, resulting in the Constituent Assembly being dissolved the next day by order of the Congress of Soviets.[4]
As the revolution was not universally recognized, there followed the struggles of the Russian Civil War (1917–22) and the creation of the Soviet Union in 1922.
Not sure this is a good thing.
en.wikipedia.org...