TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -13-

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Proof will never be sharp enough or clear enough for you.

That pic was way worse than balding guy in hong kong and people still had trouble IDing that guy. Was there even a positive ID of that guy?

All the london pic shows is some woman who was holding her purse like Page in one very publicized foto.

Huh, that Hillary Clinton hole goes deep. A member on another thread speculated that the President of Ecuador might have facilitated Manafort talking to Assange via Ecuador to the embassy in London on a secure line which of course I think is silly. Why on earth would the President of Ecuador care about that? Assange is an irritant to them.

But ... on looking deeper ...

Ecuador pledges to leave oil field undeveloped. This was announced at The Clinton Global Initiative Meeting.

The Clinton Global Initiative (www.clintonglobalinitiative.org) is a non-partisan catalyst for action, bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges. The Clinton Global Initiative is a project of the William J. Clinton Foundation (www.clintonfoundation.org).

But that's not all. We have discussed before how both countries and firms would lobby for State Dept. favor through donations to the Clinton Foundation? So, it seems that Chevron got into trouble with Ecuador.

Chevron, another major sponsor of the Shanghai pavilion, spent $20.8 million on lobbying in 2009 alone. The State Department was among the recipients of those lobbying efforts.

Chevron also donated between $500,000 and $1 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to donor records.

The oil conglomerate had a variety of interests before the State Department at the time, including a potentially devastating legal case in Ecuador and its reported push to secure fracking concessions around the globe.

So why was Ecuador upset with Chevron? There was an environmental lawsuit over contaminated rainforest, and they stood to lose billions because they'd been found guilty. Of course, this was stuff they'd acquired from Texoco, so they didn't actually do it, but it become their problem upon acquisition. So they lobbied the State Dept. to intervene and made big, big donations.

Strange how it all worked out ...

The Clintons had " significant investments" in Chevron before they shifted all their assets from stocks to cash ahead of Hillary's first presidential campaign to avoid conflicts of interest, the Washington Post reported in 2007.

Chevron's interactions with the State Department during Clinton's tenure were certainly not limited to the issue of Texaco's operations in Ecuador, however.

As Clinton's State Department touted the virtue of fracking around the globe, Chevron racked up drilling rights on six continents with the agency's help.

Isn't it interesting how that all works out for Chevron? From multi-million dollar loser to frakking superstar on six continents.

Oh, and the lawsuit? Dismissed on charges of corruption in the Ecuadorian legal system. But FOIA requests have revealed lobbying the State Dept. to put pressure on the Ecuadorian gov. in a variety of ways including altering a human rights report. And the sole witness to the claimed corruption? He and his family were all relocated and naturalized on Chevron's dime! Neat, huh?

So maybe Ecuador did have an axe to grind.

a reply to: CoramDeo

Looked at the wrong graph but it is still 3 numbers instead of 2.

Anyway, the first time that pair of numbers was posted it was after senate approved to end the ban on weapons sales to SA. It wasn't until after the election that Q decided to say "the election results is what I meant".

ETA: The post just said:
53-47
Q

Talk about leaving things wide open with something about SA to fall back on.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: imthegoat
Here is what the convening of Military investigators was about, just in case anyone missed it.

SC, NC inmates busted in ‘Operation Surprise Party’ sextortion scheme of military members linked to contraband cellphones

Sry guiz, no stolen newkz.

I would not dismiss this easily. The symbolism is key. We cannot go down each and every single blackmail effort to reveal it - it would take millions of years.

This reveals the darker aspects of the blackmail effort in regards to the military. In essence a smaller reflection of a larger issue has been brought to light and introduced in a way that some average folks can deal with.

I'm not one to look for diamonds in a pile of horse manure. Some things can, and should, be taken at face value. That operation mentioned would cover the reason why all of those investigators were there, including local and federal law enforcement and IRS. It was a yuuuuuge extortion ring.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Proof will never be sharp enough or clear enough for you.

That pic was way worse than balding guy in hong kong and people still had trouble IDing that guy. Was there even a positive ID of that guy?

All the london pic shows is some woman who was holding her purse like Page in one very publicized foto.

I always star posts that quote me....regardless.

a reply to: ketsuko

Whoa, you better cap the well, think you struck oil.

I remember awhile back watching a docu on that Texaco/Chevron mess. Mostly the enviro damage caused and left to the indigenous to clean-up. Think Netflix has or had it.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Proof will never be sharp enough or clear enough for you.

That pic was way worse than balding guy in hong kong and people still had trouble IDing that guy. Was there even a positive ID of that guy?

All the london pic shows is some woman who was holding her purse like Page in one very publicized foto.

Follow the rabbit...
qmap.pub...

The idea is that no-one can hide! LOL 😂

a reply to: FlyingFox

Great, could you honestly say you could ID anyone in that pic?

Kinda looks like "X" isn't proof. If I was on a jury and that is all the prosecution had I would have to vote not guilty. There is definite reasonable doubt left with that pic.

originally posted by: LurkNoMore
The idea is that no-one can hide! LOL 😂

I remember he being the best guess but was that really him?

Even if it was, he didn't seem to be hiding. He could have at least used a toupee or a cap.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

twitter.com...

TOO.MUCH.FUNNY.

LOLLLLL

Had me loling last night.

Thats a bad come down!!! - Flies flies flies!!! Flies everywhere... those who know - know. Scanner Darkly?

originally posted by: LurkNoMore

The idea is that no-one can hide! LOL 😂

Nice! I think that's a London's police state motto

a reply to: daskakik

I think Q confirmed it. I think I remember Q quoted a post with him in it as confirmation...

I will look for it later.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Remember the tanks in Russia?

Let the party begin

It's like an ironic combination of the Fall of the Berlin Wall and Occupy Wall Street.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_people

en.wikipedia.org...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_people#United_States

en.wikipedia.org...

I love this timeline.



Full version...

Shhhht, just between us ...
Q says colors are important

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
I think Q confirmed it. I think I remember Q quoted a post with him in it as confirmation...

I will look for it later.

Don't bother, "Q says so" doesn't mean anything. You can't use the source to confirm. That is circular logic.

a reply to: Cassi3l

Their symbolism will be their downfall.

a reply to: Cassi3l

Yeah, "Red" the colour of Socialism/Communism...

more "proof" that "q" is talking about a marxist style revolution

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: daskakik

I think Q confirmed it. I think I remember Q quoted a post with him in it as confirmation...

I will look for it later.

My post was more directed to folks that have been seeking truths. Some on the other hand will not admit 1 single thing has yet been brought to light via Q drops.

a reply to: daskakik

OK.

Can't prove the pics but the point was he owned some horribly questionable daycare facilities in Hong Kong I believe.

So the pic was a hint anons dug it up, don't you remember this?

Or are you just pretending to not remember

a reply to: LurkNoMore

I know

I just do it for new readers.