originally posted by: samuelsson
If Q is anybody close to what has ben speculated about, well duh ofcoarse its dangerous.. It's also dangerous roaming the world wide web. Whats your
The options I see for who Q is are:
A: A performance artist with a knack for game design, that is well tuned into the news (since only as soon as 2016 election it could have only even
been glued to the news and related social media topic trends one could have put Q's data set together by around the time he started) and has some
above average insights & knowledge into crowd psychology and propaganda techniques. More or less of the "Alt-Right" persuasion.
B: Some sort of element(s) from within the political possibly even the intelligence community, which in either case, from what I've seen about it this
would most likely be of the subversive hatchetman sort.
C: GOT SOMETHING BETTER THAN THAT?
Its hard to say between A & B, but so many failed predictions, falsehoods and self-defeating this' and that's like I've been going into detail about.
If leaning towards A, I'd profile him as mid to late 20's, clever and pretty well researched, maybe older, but whatever the case of age, I get the
impression he wasnt too much all into all this sort of stuff until within a couple years of the 2016 election. There are many hallmarks of someone
'made for' this kind of stuff, but wasnt quite yet at the ideal level of knowledge and wisdom to truly set the Game off and it live up to this
"AWAKENING" thing its supposed to be, unless that is dude doesnt even care about it and is just a fame ego junkie opportunist. It's roughly
96.4846052% likely he wasnt both 'of age' and 'around' the happenings around all this sort of stuff during the previous decade, for example, unless as
a typical partisan sort who wasnt particularly tuned into this stuff at that stage of life and more or less bought the long con that is the Two Party
+ MSM System. But I'd go with the younger semi-newer to the scene version. Most the times I tried to browse some "drops" it came off as someone
tweeting about the stuff they were watching in the news, or researching on the internet that night, and reporting it in that weird way he likes to
write it. A research junkie for sure, I know the walk the lifestyle, there's a good chance a lot of that stuff beyond what the MSM bombards us about
he was just digging up himself on google for the first time the same night. A creative genius that gets dead set addicted to and focused on all this
stuff, even working a full time job unrelated to any of it, I did far more 'actual' content presentation as I was doing proper writing, artwork,
multiple film projects, blog posts + comments debating, ATS threads, forums debating, etc amidst the constant often exclusive research behind it all,
the width and breadth and scale of the 'actual content' posted each year between 2005-2010 far exceeded the 'actual content' Q has published. Although
with that shorthand he uses it would have been far easier. Consider that when I popped back into all this stuff in mid-2016, had been away for 5 years
for various reasons, I only had I think about 8000 posts here in ATS, and now its 25000 while I've even published some ten hours of complex film
project work. So yeah a creative genius all in into this stuff can get a ton done in a couple years, like Q has. I'm a product of the 90's and 00's,
this 'blurb scale format' of today most peoples scale of communication everyone lives by now that's the product of the post-Facebook/Twitter world...
What month were you born in back in what was it 1990 or 1991, Q??
Now you gotta heavily integrate social/psychology mind/brains sciences along side your usual research, seriously, that is if you are really intent on
being the real thing and knowing and being able to teach what is is needed to be it. All of this comes from the human brain, thats the 'world' that
needs to be saved, and they are the barrier that unless overcome all of these sorts of efforts are ultimately an embarrassing crapshoot in terms of
actual results. Unless your goal is merely to get off on riling up the herd, that is.
edit on 12-11-2018 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)