posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 11:44 PM
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: cynicalheathen
That's not what she said in the video.
In the interview, she waffled and deliberately didn't answer whether or not she intended to ban/confiscate semi-auto firearms or so-called "assault
rifles", because she (and every other anti-freedom gun-grabber) knows that she can't just come out and admit to their end goals. It would sink any
chance of election and give the other side copious ammunition.
The bill that she admits supporting (Georgia HB 731), contains language that would prohibit ownership
and require seizure
semi-automatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has "scary features" or any semi-automatic pistol magazine with a capacity of more than 10
rounds if it were passed. This would effectively make felons overnight of a majority of GA gun owners. Oh, and they can graciously turn their formerly
legal possessions over to the State of Georgia for destruction without compensation.
Do you think that Abrams, who admits to enjoying shooting, will turn in her firearms which meet that description? Do you think that she will make her
security detail abide by the same law that the "little people" have to? Her main benefactor in the fight against the right to lawful self-defense,
Michael Bloomberg, sure hasn't. Until these so-called "leaders" subject themselves to the same rules which they impose on others, they are, and will
continue to be big fat hypocrites. So I say again... "Rights for me, but not for thee..."
Use deductive reasoning and examine not just what people say but their actions.
edit on 11-4-2018 by cynicalheathen because: (no reason given)