It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MAHLI tackles Grange - Sol 2217, November 1, 2018. The Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) has taken a look at Grange.
It could be Inclusions or maybe crystals or even signs of past or present life.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LookingAtMars
It could be Inclusions or maybe crystals or even signs of past or present life.
Based on visual analysis alone, there are a lot of things that might be signs of life.
And aren't.
We have no boots on the ground.
The mission takes the next step by not only seeking signs of habitable conditions on Mars in the ancient past, but also searching for signs of past microbial life itself.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LookingAtMars
Ambiguous results are just that. No more, no less.
Some things have been learned since then.
Oh yeah ? What about the little white velociraptor foot prints in the bottom pic ? Hmmmmm
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LookingAtMars
It could be Inclusions or maybe crystals or even signs of past or present life.
Based on visual analysis alone, there are a lot of things that might be signs of life.
And aren't.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LookingAtMars
The first attempt was quite ambitious and all it produced was ambiguity.
Later landers (which can move and can do a variety of observations) are not a step back, but a means of focus (and science).
Side note: if 2020 finds no sign of life, will you protest based only on those early, ambiguous results?
The fact NASA quit looking for life on Mars for so long and now will look again finally is huge.
ambiguity and stuff
Now, more than four decades after the Viking landings — and with a lot more information about Mars in hand — Levin believes that NASA hasn't properly followed up on the Viking landers' results.
Gilbert Levin, Mars maverick. Credit: Gilbert Levin "I am certain that NASA knows there is life on Mars," he said this past July on David Livingston's popular online program "The Space Show." Levin called for a re-examination of Viking LR data by an objective panel. But there's more. Over the past 40 years, a succession of orbiters, landers and rovers has gathered evidence that life exists on Mars today, Levin said. There is "substantial and circumstantial evidence for extant microbial life on Mars," he said on "The Space Show."
It could be Inclusions or maybe crystals or even signs of past or present life.
I think we are seeing a calcium sulphate with some metallic oxides (maybe iron or manganese) carried by the water that was reacting with the rock.
originally posted by: Namdru
a reply to: LookingAtMars
It could be Inclusions or maybe crystals or even signs of past or present life.
Could be. Or not. The white crystalline matrix and black crystals could be many things. Looks like a metamorphic rock I picked up on St. Croix in 1974. This being mars and all, the black stuff is very likely some kind of iron compound. And given Mars' watery past, the white stuff is very likely a silica compound. I wonder what the results will show ... iron oxide crystals do form in conjunction with bacteriological activity. But maybe not always...what do I know?
Regardless,
I want to believe!