Trump administration tried to hide an ethics waiver which indicates their plans against Mueller

Last night the news broke that the Trump administration had signed an ethics waiver in April of this year but they did not make this information public like they are supposed to. As you can see here all ethics waivers are published online. This waiver is for Soliciter General Noel Francisco and waives him from any ethics rules in relation to who his law firm, Jones Day, is representing.

So, keeping the waiver secret is one story but the bigger story are the implications. Jones Day represents Donald Trump in the Mueller investigation. If Rod Rosenstein is fired the Mueller investigation would fall to the Solicitor General because the third position in the DOJ is currently vacant. However, without this waiver he would not be able to legally take the Mueller investigation due to conflicts of interest.

So it is now obvious what Trumps plans are for after the election. He will either fire Rosenstein or Rosenstein and Sessions and allow the investigation to fall to Noel Francisco a former member of the law firm defending Trump.

Link

a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

Anyone who has dug into Meuller and the phony Russia collusion knows that it's a crooked operation and Meuller is quite dirty. There's your ethics violation.

About time Sessions and Rosenstein are shown the door. Deep State crew and shenanigans.

We expect to see the Jackal digging deep into nothing each day. His hyenas not far behind.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

Orange man criminal.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

Orange man criminal.

Dark Angel bigger criminal.

originally posted by: The GUT
Anyone who has dug into Meuller and the phony Russia collusion knows that it's a crooked operation and Meuller is quite dirty.

About time Sessions and Rosenstein are shown the door. Deep State crew and shenanigans.

You are sooooo right. It is so phony, nothing to see there at all. Except maybe the fact that everyone he has indicted ed has either pleaded guilty or been found guilty. Yeah, nothing there at all.

originally posted by: pteridine

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

Orange man criminal.

Dark Angel bigger criminal.

Orange man cultists head in sand.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

It’s just funny how you are sooo quick to grab hold of hoaxes like they are the gospel truth when they feed into your world view. But when something is against your world view no amount of evidence will change your mind.

All I have to say is, if the people who follow trump have no problem with this administration throwing ethics out the window, they have no room to ever cry foul about anything a Democrat or anyone else does ever again.

They claim to be for law and order but it should be obvious to everyone what they’re really for: Trump. And nothing else.

America, law and order, ethics, are only words to these people.

a reply to: BlackJackal

This is extremely ironic, as the real cause of concern what comes to ethics is Mueller himself.

Mueller sins by Gohmert

a reply to: BlackJackal

He will either fire Rosenstein or Rosenstein and Sessions

Or neither of the above will happen.

originally posted by: BlackJackal

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

It’s just funny how you are sooo quick to grab hold of hoaxes like they are the gospel truth when they feed into your world view. But when something is against your world view no amount of evidence will change your mind.

Still upset about that thread being removed from the hoax bin?


Have a Snickers.

a reply to: BlackJackal

It’s just funny how....

What's really funny is that you keep coming back day in and day out to post over and over and over again, yet you evidently recognize that by and large....

But when something is against your world view no amount of evidence will change your mind.

You're not reaching anybody. You're not converting anybody. The only people you engage with in every one of your threads are the die-hards, and you just spew rhetoric at each other and wander off back to your corners. It's honestly pretty perplexing why somebody, who claims to be so intelligent that you understand all of the hidden signals and sneaky words Trump uses to incite violence, comes here to do.....whatever it is you think you're doing every day.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: BlackJackal

He will either fire Rosenstein or Rosenstein and Sessions

Or neither of the above will happen.

Or it will happen. And his followers will be right here making excuses for it and talking to people like they’re NPCs.

Because in the end, that’s all they really have. It should be telling that there is no pro Trump arguments coming from them. Just anti everyone else.

originally posted by: deckdel
a reply to: BlackJackal

This is extremely ironic, as the real cause of concern what comes to ethics is Mueller himself.

Mueller sins by Gohmert

Hahahaha!!!!!

Really?? Are you serious? This is called propaganda my friend. Before his appointment to the special Council Mueller was revered by both Democrats and Republicans alike. It wasn’t until after his appointment that any of these Republicans had these dire concerns about Mueller.

If he is soooo bad then why didn’t they do anything before? Are the Republicans in Congress not doing their jobs? Because if he truly is this bad then it is Congresses job to speak up and remove him from his job as head of the FBI. But no they didn’t. For some reason they all kept saying how great he was, until appointed special council.

That’s why what you posted is crap. He didn’t just become a bad guy once appointed special council.

Seriously, you believe this dribble?

a reply to: BlackJackal

But what exactly have they pleaded guilty to or been found guilty of?

Tax evasion going back how many years before Trump came on scene? Lying to the FBI? What exactly, as to do directly with proof of Russian Collusion has any of these folks been found guilty of?

a reply to: Shamrock6

You're not reaching anybody. You're not converting anybody.

Do you say all this same stuff in the pro-Trump, liberal Democrat bashing threads?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: BlackJackal

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: BlackJackal


So...Orange man bad?

It’s just funny how you are sooo quick to grab hold of hoaxes like they are the gospel truth when they feed into your world view. But when something is against your world view no amount of evidence will change your mind.

Still upset about that thread being removed from the hoax bin?


Have a Snickers.

Dude you have a history of buying into hoaxes.

Isn’t this your work as well?

link

originally posted by: BlackJackal

originally posted by: The GUT
Anyone who has dug into Meuller and the phony Russia collusion knows that it's a crooked operation and Meuller is quite dirty.

About time Sessions and Rosenstein are shown the door. Deep State crew and shenanigans.

You are sooooo right. It is so phony, nothing to see there at all. Except maybe the fact that everyone he has indicted ed has either pleaded guilty or been found guilty. Yeah, nothing there at all.

But not 1 of these is even remotely related to the original accusation of Russian collusion. The investigation is an elaborate diversion tactic away from inditing the real perps in the Democratic party. And I'm sorry to say, it has worked.

originally posted by: BlackJackal
As you can see here all ethics waivers are published online.

What exactly leads you to believe that all ethics waivers are published online?