It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

October 27, 2018 Italian UFO Conference Transcript Featuring DeLonge And Elizondo

page: 2
19
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 09:29 AM
link   
Any time I see Tom DeLonges name I can't help but cringe. I read recently that he is something like $28 million in the hole for this project. Blows my mind but again that makes me think he is fraudulently taking money from people. But I do hope that his work pays off to prove me wrong.




posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: spleenika

Well all I can say, is that one of the founders of UFOlogy
never found anything particular interesting with the
samples, and I don't either.

But let's say that someone wants to postulate that there's
something interesting in the layered composition or the
isotopic ratios.

(I don't.. scientists and metallurgists in general don't)

It doesn't EQUAL little green men in space ships.

If this is what the grand 'core story' is depending upon..
such feeble non-evidence of anything.. if this is the
rather pathetic crumbs that people who are desperate
to believe in such narratives cling to, then that is
really sad.

Now.. that appeal to reason aside, I'm not adverse to
the notion that some unique 'fields' of physics could
have had an effect on a few bits of industrial slag.

But again, that doesn't equate to UFOS or not even
necessarily UAP's.



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 11:28 AM
link   
So which aerial phenomenon should we shoot down? The futuristic, twisted, para normal, trickster kind or the really high tech, cybernetic organism that don't have much of a sense of humour kind, when they are almost as defiant as the other guys?



edit on 1-11-2018 by Specimen because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Specimen
So which aerial phenomenon should we shoot down? The futuristic, twisted, para normal, trickster kind or the really high tech, cybernetic organism that don't have much of a sense of humour kind, when they are almost as defiant as the other guys?




Shoot them both and let God sort it out?

Just kidding.

I don't like how the first response is always shooting..

If the 'phenomenon' had that attitude, we'd all be toast.

Kev



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: spleenika
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Yes Earth Tech is owned by Hal Puthoff. And he is a very controversial character that puts off a lot of people. And yes, I deserve the death penalty for that pun.


No, you deserve applause!! I asked for TTSA Knock-Knock jokes in another thread and suggested surely there must be one or two in "Puthoff." Got none so the pun is well done and appreciated---Bravo!


I understand what you are saying and it's possible that this is a sincere effort, but given the track record of key players and seeing as how they are focusing on some things from ufology's past that haven't passed previous tests it's hard for me to take their claims of purpose at face value.

Many of those involved do seem to have a sincere and long background in New Age belief systems, so maybe they are just some harmless true believers trying to make a business out of their passion. If so, nothing wrong with that.

On the other hand have you ever looked into Puthoff's participation in the SERPO hoax?



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Well, apparently in one story they shot the trickster...didn't even flinch or flicker, and went back to whatever depths it came from. Although it did leave a mess that it didn't make.

As for the other guy, whose not usually associated with the other guy hasn't been scratched yet, all the while might be able shut all the fancy stuff down.

From what im summarizing anyways.
edit on 1-11-2018 by Specimen because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-11-2018 by Specimen because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 01:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Specimen

I mean the 'real' trickster, not what happened at SWR.

But ok..



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Serpo...I thought that was Richard Doty. I did not know Hal Puthoff was involved in that. What a great story that was, they should have sold it to hollywood.



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 03:08 PM
link   
I think that when you get "the company" involved in anything, there are ulterior motives involved. They don't wear the white hats....



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 04:20 PM
link   
All I can say is that Elizondo knows absolutely nothing about UFO history.

He's hinting that lots of trucks and armed personnel were involved in Roswell. There's not a record of it.

He's talking absolute crap about the 1952 Washington DC flap. There are no photos or film of that event. Nor were there hundreds of witnesses.

And as for space shuttle 'interesting sightings'. Well yes I'm sure there are.....but not any that haven't been explained.

TTSA are amateurs. They are basically the partially sighted leading the blind.


edit on 1/11/2018 by mirageman because: ...



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 04:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman
TTSA are amateurs. They are basically the partially sighted leading the blind.

Pretty much the impression I get. I generally don't trust anybody who promotes a story that lacks specific details to the point where I could have come up with it on my own. And even an innocent bystander like myself knows more about UFO history than these guys, just by poking around for years in patchouli-smelling new age bookstores.



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear



I don't like how the first response is always shooting..

If the 'phenomenon' had that attitude, we'd all be toast.


Aren't we already disappearing in droves and animals dissected?



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

I gave you a star for your new profile pic.

It's pretty cool.

I did NOT like your chucky doll pic.

I might like Jennifer Tilly, but that doll look .. yuck.



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Whatsthisthen

I have no idea if the 411 thing is modern mythology or has some
paranormal element of truth to it.

None at all.

Or could be serial killers.. they like taking victims in national
parks..

Something else to investigate I guess.



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Ron Pandolfi.

Grant Cameron suspects that he is the man pulling the strings behind the scenes. Not just TTSA.

What is known about Pandolfi? His motives and goals?



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 05:41 PM
link   
holy fu#king sh#t, he has gone full rich doty



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

411?



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 06:24 PM
link   



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Got it, thanks. Plus lots of people outside the US go missing.

By the way, I'll wager those fragments on the first page of this thread are genuine. Of human manufacture and originated in the landmass encapsulated by the old USSR. What isn't said is silica with odd properties.

But I am no scientist nor an expert on anything.



posted on Nov, 2 2018 @ 04:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman
All I can say is that Elizondo knows absolutely nothing about UFO history.

He's hinting that lots of trucks and armed personnel were involved in Roswell. There's not a record of it.

He's talking absolute crap about the 1952 Washington DC flap. There are no photos or film of that event. Nor were there hundreds of witnesses.

And as for space shuttle 'interesting sightings'. Well yes I'm sure there are.....but not any that haven't been explained.

TTSA are amateurs. They are basically the partially sighted leading the blind.



In reality this is quite disturbing?



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join