It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DOJ Says if Trump Declassifies FISA Documents - Mueller Can Charge Him With Obstruction of Justice.

page: 3
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 27 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   
He should release it (or leak it) and fire every person involved in Mueller's probe and in drafting the DOJ "opinion"

They are his employees, to do as they are told. There is no "Separation of powers" between executive branch agencies like DOJ/FBI/etc. It is simply: Boss issues order, subordinates carry out order or else.

But I'd still personally leak it. Or ensure Rep Nunes gets ahold of it, so he can read it aloud on the House floor while they're in-session and be absolutely immune from any risk of prosecution whatsoever.

Or the President could release the document (as it is his sole decision to do so, classification doesn't exist without POTUS) and immediately pardon himself or even proactively pardon himself. The President must never be held hostage by executive branch subordinates.




posted on Oct, 27 2018 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
I think that such a decision would end up in the SCOTUS.

How convenient. With the new justice and stuff.

Clever attempt though.


Oh sure.

If Hilldabeast had won, I bet you'd be silent on how stacked the court would have been.



posted on Oct, 27 2018 @ 02:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Phage
I think that such a decision would end up in the SCOTUS.

How convenient. With the new justice and stuff.

Clever attempt though.


Oh sure.

If Hilldabeast had won, I bet you'd be silent on how stacked the court would have been.


Hildebrand? Was a Hildebrand nominated to be a Justice? When?

In any case, I don't favor a SCOTUS heavily weighted toward any political philosophy. Had a more liberal Justice been appointed, the Court would have approached balance, not stacking.




edit on 10/27/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   
DOJ department of jerk offs.
a reply to: carewemust



posted on Oct, 27 2018 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Phage
I think that such a decision would end up in the SCOTUS.

How convenient. With the new justice and stuff.

Clever attempt though.


Oh sure.

If Hilldabeast had won, I bet you'd be silent on how stacked the court would have been.


Hildebrand? Was a Hildebrand nominated to be a Justice? When?

In any case, I don't favor a SCOTUS heavily weighted toward any political philosophy. Had a more liberal Justice been appointed, the Court would have approached balance, not stacking.





Hardly.



posted on Oct, 28 2018 @ 08:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Phage
I think that such a decision would end up in the SCOTUS.

How convenient. With the new justice and stuff.

Clever attempt though.


Oh sure.

If Hilldabeast had won, I bet you'd be silent on how stacked the court would have been.


Hildebrand? Was a Hildebrand nominated to be a Justice? When?

In any case, I don't favor a SCOTUS heavily weighted toward any political philosophy. Had a more liberal Justice been appointed, the Court would have approached balance, not stacking.





you should be sending vitamins to RBG. Her departure would make your views a bit more fearful, for you at least.



posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

That would be interesting. It is possible Trump is clean!
edit on 04pmSun, 04 Nov 2018 14:32:32 -0600kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: network dude

That would be interesting. It is possible Trump is clean!


Completely?



posted on Nov, 13 2018 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Not completely clean, that’s definitely for sure. He is a corrupt man.



posted on Nov, 13 2018 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Thank-you for your input NCA. Who is "old Sparky"?


"Old Sparky", if I'm not mistaken, is a slang reference to the "Electric Chair". Sometimes stray electricity will spark at connections, body parts, etc.

Is that the correct read of the term?



new topics




 
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join