It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am curious about your selective way to speculate what religious affiliation may be behind a thread when you don't even know its author by the way? This message can be coming from other different place by the way, one you even don't imagen.
Pope Leo X was furious. On 15 June 1520, he issued a document called Exsurge Domine, ordering the burning of Luther's writings and threatening to excommunicate Luther if he didn't recant in sixty days. Luther's response was to burn the Papal Bull plus other Church-issued materials with which he disagreed
There are conflicting reports on whether the shroud will return to the chapel or if it will remain in the Turin cathedral where it has been since the fire. ... Researchers determined that the blood patterns on the shroud were not consistent with a crucified person being wrapped up in the sheet.
of cloth by NASA experts have revealed that the image is not made
Callahan’s original analysis is not readily available, but reviews of the decades-old infrared photography examination of the piece carried out by him did not conclude that the material was metaphysical in origin. A 2010 Skeptoid item summarized Callahan’s findings less sensationally (transposing the date of the research in 1979 [PDF] with its publication in 1981), adding that subsequent analysis did not support any supernatural elements:
infrared photographs show that the hands have been modified, and close-up photography shows that pigment has been applied to the highlight areas of the face sufficiently heavily so as to obscure the texture of the cloth. There is also obvious cracking and flaking of paint all along a vertical seam, and the infrared photos reveal in the robe’s fold what appear to be sketch lines, suggesting that an artist roughed out the figure before painting it. Portrait artist Glenn Taylor has pointed out that the part in the Virgin’s hair is off-center; that her eyes, including the irises, have outlines, as they often do in paintings, but not in nature, and that these outlines appear to have been done with a brush; and that much other evidence suggests the picture was probably copied by an inexpert artist from an expertly done original.
In fact, during a formal investigation of the cloth in 1556, it was stated that the image was “painted yesteryear by an Indian,” specifically “the Indian painter Marcos.” This was probably the Aztec painter Marcos Cipac de Aquino who was active in Mexico at the time the Image of Guadalupe appeared.
graven image /ɡreɪvnˈɪmɪdʒ/ noun
a carved idol or representation of a god used as an object of worship.
They Came To Earth Millions Of Years Ago To Spread The Poison Of Hatred, War And Catastrophe... They Are With Us Still...
I see a beautiful girl, she has not corrupted me but my own thought's the inherent sinful and lust's of my own nature do indeed corrupt me.
we are joined in a way in our discussion, remember what he said "Where ever two or more are gathered in my name there I am also".
ask that he bless all those that have partaken of this discussion and if we are in any way wrong to show us our error's
if you bring a ridicule photographic montage to depict Christ with a fiction look that remember better the servants of Caiaphas or Annas,
you are not the Pope, you don't have any moral of religious authority to decree that!!
longer such absurd claims against my reputation, or the ones against the institutions he is attacking in a monologue
You are referring perhaps to demonic idols of ancient times when Christ didn't even born yet.
- The church belonged to a denomination that is ascribed to the Protestant Reform. -
Hardline sects of Protestantism condemn what they call Idolatry practices of other denominations, veneration of images.
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: EasternShadow
You are really funny, with all respect but nothing you say debunk the original hypothesis suggested by the thread, to the contrary reinforces it.
Do you realize what kind of objects are you referring to?
You are calling others to use their common sense, you have talked about one of the 3 fires that historically the burial shroud of Jesus has survived!
That is of course other religious object that miracolously has survived destruction, but moreover it is perhaps the most important Holy relic of the world!!
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: EasternShadow
Please don't be ridiculous Raggedyman, you are loosing credibility:
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: EasternShadow
The bricks can not be reduced as ashes, as a painting or a shroud certainly can, but they are visibly damaged in its original aspect, darkened by the event something didn't occur with the portrait.
But was that the "original" shroud?
wiki