It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Julie Swetnick and shyster Michael Avenatti Referred for Criminal Investigation

page: 2
35
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 12:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: xuenchen

Hey Xuen where's your smoke-girl signature that I still don't fully understand but don't want to admit?

I just admitted it huh.


"Purple Rain for Julie"



"Yellow Rain for the Creep"




posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: sligtlyskeptical

Where's that?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 12:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody



about the 3 min mark. LOL.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

hahahah....He seems so clownish now that we truly know what he is.


edit on 25-10-2018 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

This like many of the other madcow clips will NEVER get old.
Kids in political science classes will be studying these times in the future similarly to how nixon is studied today.
"This is how NOT to do this.""There used to be a democratic party".

"I do not traffic in nonsense or rumor"-some bald guy circa 2018
edit on 25/10/2018 by shooterbrody because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
This is going to lead to exactly where Grassley does not want it to lead.


Clearly no one else in this thread has thought it through that far.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: crtrvt

Please, by all means, lay out for us exactly where this will lead.
Provide a road map for us.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: crtrvt

Please, by all means, lay out for us exactly where this will lead.
Provide a road map for us.



it is going to lead to devastation for the idiots.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
This is going to lead to exactly where Grassley does not want it to lead.


You mean where Diane Feinstein doesn't want it to lead right?

Dr Ford not clear about Committee offers



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: crtrvt

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
This is going to lead to exactly where Grassley does not want it to lead.


Clearly no one else in this thread has thought it through that far.


we aren't nearly as educated. Perhaps you could explain it, like you were speaking to children.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: crtrvt

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
This is going to lead to exactly where Grassley does not want it to lead.


Clearly no one else in this thread has thought it through that far.


we aren't nearly as educated. Perhaps you could explain it, like you were speaking to children.


Also...please tell him to not use too many big words.
edit on 25-10-2018 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

If Caillou and Tito Ortiz had a baby, it would look like Avenatti.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Plotus

Did they think Tangling with Trump would come out any other way ? Megyn Kelly found out it was folly and destructive.... just saying.


How so? She got a $20,000,000 a year contract? I'd take that for all my Dick l'Orange insults.


She isn't gonna be working for NBC anymore. She said something about black face.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:26 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
www.washingtonpost.com... f726d1c_story.html?utm_term=.dfb063766fd5



Avenatti responded to the news of the criminal referral on Twitter, calling it “ironic” that Grassley is “now interested in investigations.” He appeared to be speaking on behalf of himself and Swetnick. “He didn’t care when it came to putting a man on the SCOTUS for life,” he tweeted, referring to the Supreme Court. “We welcome the investigation as now we can finally get to the bottom of Judge Kavanaugh’s lies and conduct. Let the truth be known.” Later, Avenatti argued that the referral was good for him and Swetnick because it could bring to light more details about Kavanaugh’s past conduct. “Maybe if Grassley was actually a lawyer that knew something about the law, he would realize what he has done. He just opened up Pandora’s box as it relates to Justice Kavanaugh’s conduct. It is Christmas in October!” Avenatti tweeted.


LOL
What kind of lawyer is he?
The issue is he and his client and not kavanaugh.
Or did kavanaugh now make them lie to congress?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Creepy Porn Lawyer is getting Gang-Raped by the Justice system.
Swetnik will turn on him for a deal protecting her from perjury charges.

Sounds like a plan to me.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:36 PM
link   
www.judiciary.senate.gov... link from senate judiciary committee to go with true pundit source that not every one likes

WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley today referred Julie Swetnick and her attorney Michael Avenatti to the Justice Department for criminal investigation relating to a potential conspiracy to provide materially false statements to Congress and obstruct a congressional committee investigation, three separate crimes, in the course of considering Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States. While the Committee was in the middle of its extensive investigation of the late-breaking sexual-assault allegations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Avenatti publicized his client’s allegations of drug- and alcohol-fueled gang rapes in the 1980s. The obvious, subsequent contradictions along with the suspicious timing of the allegations necessitate a criminal investigation by the Justice Department. “When a well-meaning citizen comes forward with information relevant to the committee’s work, I take it seriously. It takes courage to come forward, especially with allegations of sexual misconduct or personal trauma. I’m grateful for those who find that courage,” Grassley said. “But in the heat of partisan moments, some do try to knowingly mislead the committee. That’s unfair to my colleagues, the nominees and others providing information who are seeking the truth. It stifles our ability to work on legitimate lines of inquiry. It also wastes time and resources for destructive reasons. Thankfully, the law prohibits such false statements to Congress and obstruction of congressional committee investigations. For the law to work, we can’t just brush aside potential violations. I don’t take lightly making a referral of this nature, but ignoring this behavior will just invite more of it in the future.” Grassley referred Swetnick and Avenatti for investigation in a letter sent today to the Attorney General of the United States and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The letter notes potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001 and 1505, which respectively define the federal criminal offenses of conspiracy, false statements and obstruction of Congress. The referral seeks further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime. The referral methodically details the issues with Swetnick’s allegations as relayed by Avenatti, the immediate diversion of committee resources to investigate those allegations, the subsequent contradictions by both Swetnick and Avenatti, the lack of substantiating or corroborating evidence, and the overarching and serious credibility problems pervading the presentation of these allegations.
they have more links at the source



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
This is going to lead to exactly where Grassley does not want it to lead.


Lol, it sure is. This will require a real investigation.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

it's almost as if Avanati didn't see Swetnek waling back her sworn affidavit.


Long before Kavanaugh is brought back up, there is some splaining to do.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: xuenchen
www.washingtonpost.com... f726d1c_story.html?utm_term=.dfb063766fd5



Avenatti responded to the news of the criminal referral on Twitter, calling it “ironic” that Grassley is “now interested in investigations.” He appeared to be speaking on behalf of himself and Swetnick. “He didn’t care when it came to putting a man on the SCOTUS for life,” he tweeted, referring to the Supreme Court. “We welcome the investigation as now we can finally get to the bottom of Judge Kavanaugh’s lies and conduct. Let the truth be known.” Later, Avenatti argued that the referral was good for him and Swetnick because it could bring to light more details about Kavanaugh’s past conduct. “Maybe if Grassley was actually a lawyer that knew something about the law, he would realize what he has done. He just opened up Pandora’s box as it relates to Justice Kavanaugh’s conduct. It is Christmas in October!” Avenatti tweeted.


LOL
What kind of lawyer is he?
The issue is he and his client and not kavanaugh.
Or did kavanaugh now make them lie to congress?

Avenatti seems to be a pretty sh!tty lawyer in my estimation, on par with the bottom-feeding ambulance chasers who hope their victims will pay up just to make them go away.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Plotus

Did they think Tangling with Trump would come out any other way ? Megyn Kelly found out it was folly and destructive.... just saying.


How so? She got a $20,000,000 a year contract? I'd take that for all my Dick l'Orange insults.


She isn't gonna be working for NBC anymore. She said something about black face.


Meghan Kelly:


“You do get in trouble if you are a white person who puts on blackface on Halloween, or a black person who puts on whiteface for Halloween,” Ms. Kelly said. “Back when I was a kid, that was O.K., as long as you were dressing up as a character.”

She added that she was perplexed by the criticism of Luann de Lesseps, a cast member of “The Real Housewives of New York” who was criticized for dressing up as Diana Ross, complete with an outsize Afro wig. “People said that that was racist, and I don’t know, I felt like, who doesn’t love Diana Ross?” Ms. Kelly said, adding: “I can’t keep up with the number of people that we’re offending just by being normal people.”

www.nytimes.com...



new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join