It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't look at things through the lens of a party.
No, I think it was a warning, is a warning, that says "If we wanted to, you'd be dead." Or words to that effect.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: TheRedneck
If the Soros device was intentionally exploded...and the others were not, how can we be certain they were all the same?
If the Soros device was intentionally exploded...and the others were not, how can we be certain they were all the same?
So, Wasserman-Schultz is the outlier. Let's look at her connections.
Why would someone from Antifa take the fall for the DNC? They hate the DNC.
I think it's a red herring, The democrats want a big showing for the midterms, From all appearances donations to the dnc are down,
the MSM will definitely make hay out of it.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: TheRedneck
If the Soros device was intentionally exploded...and the others were not, how can we be certain they were all the same?
Even if it was exploded, LEO federal, state, county etc. photograph and video everything for the archive data base.
They know who was behind this. Just waiting for the greatest propaganda impact before the big presser.
originally posted by: Archivalist
Here's the thing.
Mail bomb "anonymous technological attack", carried out by third party hands* *public sector... seriously... the USPS?
Sorry guys, the days of the Unibomber are over.
No modern attack will be en masse AND carried out by the postal service.
Mail bombs are threats now, not attacks.
Actual attacks happen with methods that don't make the news. (I could list several, but given the nature of the ATS board, I am certain that they are understood without disseminating.)