It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Candice Owens: Timing of mail bombs targeting democrats is 'suspicious'.

page: 8
60
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep




Well I know the "bombs" were are BS, and I know you think it was a right wing nut.

I know you are wrong on at least one of those points.




posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wookiep




Well I know the "bombs" were are BS, and I know you think it was a right wing nut.

I know you are wrong on at least one of those points.


K which one?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep

Conclusions base on scant evidence are your balliwick. Figure it out.

edit on 10/25/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wookiep

Conclusions base on scant evidence are your balliwick. Figure it out.


Right. I'll just go ahead and leave it up to me to come to your own conclusions. Hey, I really appreciate your help here tonight man, I mean, seriously! Lol.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep




I'll just go ahead and leave it up to me to come to your own conclusions.

You're confused. Not your fault, it's getting late.
You just told me what my conclusions are. Why do I need to do so myself? You're ever so good at it.


Well I know the "bombs" were BS, and I know you think it was a right wing nut.

edit on 10/25/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You don't think it was a right wing nut? Tell me Otherwise then.

These "bombs" are a joke, and I think even you know it at this point. But if you don't think there isn't a narrative being sold here then I have a bridge to sell you.

You are smarter than this, but you're pretending you're not. That's the part that grinds my gears.
edit on 25-10-2018 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep



You don't think it was a right wing nut? Tell me Otherwise then.

As I said in that other thread; I don't care which wingnut did it.


These "bombs" are a joke, and I think even you know it at this point.
On the contrary. This is no joking matter.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

So you disagree that at the very least, the "CNN" "bomb" wasn't a joke? Dude, that "bomb" was a pile of crap most likely concocted by CNN itself. How can you not see how obviously stupid that was? Aren't you normally the "science" guy around here? I mean wtf man?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep

I've said more than once the bomb could be a dummy. You will conclude what you will.

Sending a dummy bomb is no joke. Nor is sending a harmless white powder.
abcnews.go.com...
edit on 10/25/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 02:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You will conclude what you will as well. And I don't agree with you. So what now?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep

I have reached no conclusions about the sender(s) of the packages or their motives.

Feel free to disagree. Based on scant evidence. As is your wont.

But, if you do, you are in error. Bzzzt.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wookiep

I have reached no conclusions about the sender(s) of the packages or their motives.

Feel free to disagree. Based on scant evidence. As is your wont.

But, if you do, you are in error. Bzzzt.





Don't even attempt to "Bzzzzzt" me because of right now you don't know Wtf you're even talking about.
edit on 25-10-2018 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Guys, guys, guys, rampant speculation isn't required. We already know the culprit.

"Violent Rhetoric" has already claimed responsibility.

Words into bombs: Donald Trump’s violent rhetoric has consequences

Has age of Trump's violent rhetoric brought 'the awful' back to US politics?



You win the thread. The desperate leftist agenda is spelt out clearly...

I don't understand how anybody could read that Salon article and not see through the blatant propaganda.

Thanks for posting.



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep



Don't even attempt to "Bzzzzzt" me because of right now you don't know Wtf you're even talking about.

I do, actually.
I know that you have erroneously jumped to a conclusion about a conclusion which I have not reached.

Since it's late, and you seem to be having problems with comprehension perhaps I can clarify.

Stop putting words in my mouth.

edit on 10/25/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Oh BS. You're the one that needs to go to bed. So go to bed.

Eta- nice edit.
edit on 25-10-2018 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep
No. There you go again, telling me about me.
It's only 10:16.

edit on 10/25/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wookiep
No. There you go again, telling me about me.
It's only 10:16.


Oh yeah it's Hawaii. Old people need sleep around that time. You need it lol.
edit on 25-10-2018 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Guys, guys, guys, rampant speculation isn't required. We already know the culprit.

"Violent Rhetoric" has already claimed responsibility.

Words into bombs: Donald Trump’s violent rhetoric has consequences

Has age of Trump's violent rhetoric brought 'the awful' back to US politics?



You win the thread. The desperate leftist agenda is spelt out clearly...

I don't understand how anybody could read that Salon article and not see through the blatant propaganda.

Thanks for posting.


Wait, I remember Trump praising this "bodyslamming" a journalist. Isn't that promoting violence?
If you try to justify that, you might want to justify bombing "the wrong people", too? Really?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep

Rocky mountain high?



posted on Oct, 25 2018 @ 03:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wookiep

Rocky mountain high?




Yeah! It's great here. Your point?







 
60
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join