What do we know about the pipebombs?

a reply to: edaced4

Those locations really do suggest more than one person was involved, assuming they were all hand delivered.

a reply to: CynConcepts

Apparently, the sender thinks Brennan works at CNN.
Wrong station. The sender doesn't watch CNN?

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

The Trump image is a reach. But the ISIS flag is very clear.

Pareidolia......

It’s not “clearly a ISIS flag”, does it look similar, sure, could it be a ISIS flat, yeah is it a ISIS flag, I don’t know for certainty and neither do you or anyone else on this thread right now.

It’s just not clear enough.

Am not saying it isn’t to be clear, I am totally open to it being a Islamic attack of some kind but based on that picture it’s not enough to draw any definitive conclusions

a reply to: CynConcepts

Agreed, that is the intended picture.

But what is the source?

I am questioning the validity.

Looks like a makeshift prop.

Mg

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

eh could be isis flag but if it was a real isis attack no way in hell the bombs at least one of them would have gone off

edit to add do all the recipients have anyhting in common besides being dems? like were they all on some judicairy council etc or something like that

a reply to: Phage

I dont think anyone actually watches CNN anymore.

a reply to: CynConcepts

You think that pic is Brennan? The dude is bald.

a reply to: loam

Could be Jesse Ventura!

a reply to: loam

To be fair, I did find that on another post that was posted in a thread of the picture of the bomb..........So i cant take full credit for it, however I did find it strange that it seemed so blatantly an ISIS flag.....

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

eh could be isis flag but if it was a real isis attack no way in hell the bombs at least one of them would have gone off

One could speculate that it was just a sympathiser if you want to go down that line of thought. Someone who didn’t really know how to make a bomb so sent a bunch of fakes to cause some fear.

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

I agree. Seems very strange.

I hope someone can rundown who first published these photos.

Yeah that thing is nothing but a movie prop ....

This all seems to be a more elaborate permutation of the various letters people have sent in over the years where they sprinkled random powder inside the envelope just to cause a scare.

AKA a prank.

That is, unless the person isnt caught then that screams 'they' staged this themselves.

a reply to: RalagaNarHallas

they are all scum in bed with globalists working to destroy the country. Seems like a list of all stars for satan. Booker or Pelosi get one yet?

originally posted by: narrator

originally posted by: hillbilly4rent

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: hillbilly4rent

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

If the bombs were not real, is the sender of the packages considered a terrorist?

Yes

Then legally, that would mean the people who attacked Republicans in restaurants movie theaters campaign offices Etc are also terrorists.

Hell yes it dose!!

No, no it doesn't. You just can't equate yelling at someone and sending someone a fake bomb. That isn't on the same level. Nowhere near the same level.

Example: Is yelling at someone for parking on your lawn on the same level as trying to rob a liquor store with a fake gun?

This is workplace violence

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Just because there's an ISIS flag, doesn't mean it's an ISIS attack. I was never suggesting otherwise.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

Then legally, that would mean the people who attacked Republicans in restaurants movie theaters campaign offices Etc are also terrorists.

No. Yelling does not fall under the definition of terrorism.

But i'm sure that they did feel a bit...y'know... worried for their security
out grabbing a burger with the familly
'confronted' by a hysterical, white woman,
probably packin' iron too...

jeebuz,
i wouldn't one of them non-burger-eatin'-pistol-packin'-mommas
in my office tomorrow or even next Thursday
i would feel absolutely terrified and terrorised

but that's just me

a reply to: carewemust

Yes. The sender or senders can face the death penalty if it can be shown that the bombs could have detonated. The sender can face life in prison even though the bombs did not explode nor was anyone harmed. If meant as a political statement, it will be a very expensive one as someone is in a lot of trouble. I was watching Judge Napolitano and this is how he explained it and was very serious about it.

The thing about this is how everything will be a direct roadmap to the individual. Everything from the envelope, stamps with possiable DNA found on everything to include tape, clock, etc. It will 48 hours and they will have a location and from there a suspect will not take long.

a reply to: Cassi3l

It's their job. Right?

To listen to voters? Even those who don't like what they do. Even angry ones.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Just because there's an ISIS flag, doesn't mean it's an ISIS attack. I was never suggesting otherwise.

Yup and I am just trying to point out that we don’t know (as in know for a fact) thst this blurry crop of the picture is actually showing a ISIS flag.

Like I said we can speculate but let’s not confuse speciation with facts.

You’re speculating that this could be a ISIS flag because it looks similar. It’s a totally reasonable speculation and am not saying your wrong only that it’s just speculation.