posted on Oct, 21 2018 @ 04:50 AM
a reply to: lunarcartographer
I think you're being very generous. His analyses are entirely smoke and mirrors, suggestion and pareidolia. He never reveals the exact location of
things, he never properly identifies his sources - he says he will, but then doesn't.
His alleged Chang'e-2 images are nothing of the sort. Chang'e-2 (and it's predecessor) all show images taken at local noon - there are hardly any
shadows to be seen (which actually makes them less than useful, despite their high resolution). There is a video of Chang'e-2 entering lunar orbit,
but it is far too high and low resolution to see the details he is claiming. He throws in the location as 'Mare Orientale', but that is a huge area.
He makes sly nods and winks about the telling of the Chang'e story to Apollo 11 and that there was no comment or humour from the crew. Here's the
03 23 17 28 CC Roger. Among the large headlines concerning Apollo this morning, there's one asking that you watch for a lovely girl with a big rabbit.
An ancient legend says a beautiful Chinese girl called Chang-o has been living there for 4000 years. It seems she was banished to the Moon because she
stole the pill of immortality from her husband. You might also look for her companion, a large Chinese rabbit, who is easy to spot since he is always
standing on his hind feet in the shade of a cinnamon tree. The name of the rabbit is not reported.
03 23 18 15 LMP Okay. We'll keep a close eye out for the bunny girl.
It was a throwaway piece of news, nothing more. I will put money on that image not being from China, I have spent a lot of time downloading ans
exploring them and his image looks looking like them. In fact, the lines on he images he shows on screen look almost as if he has taken a photograph
of a screen.
You are talking about the man who claimed to have discovered a crystal spired city on the moon, when actually all he did was turn a lunar orbiter
image upside down. More on that story here:
When challenged, he ignored it.
His explanation of magazine 83 from Apollo 15 is false, it is not from the stand-up EVA, and is more likely to be from the crew trying to repair the
camera after it jammed on the surface - several of the images show what look like an interior light. The images were never secret, they just didn't
show anything worth mentioning. They're here, if anyone cares:
Like everyone else claiming these imaginary structures they make a nice living from people who don't ask too many questions about their sources and
edit on 21/10/2018 by OneBigMonkeyToo because: extra thought