The Air Force has announced that the first delivery of the KC-46, scheduled for later this month, has been pushed back. Boeing says it will happen by
the end of the year, the Air Force won't commit to any kind of timeline for delivery.
There are currently five Category One deficiencies that have to be corrected remaining. All five are related to refueling. They are still waiting on
the military operating certificate to be able to deliver the first aircraft.
It's not a good look for a program that was supposed to begin delivery five years ago. Technically more, since that'd be the second KC-X solicitation
issued.
Unofficial word coming through the grapevine is that the program continues to be completely screwed. Sources are saying that due to continuing RVS
issues, the first aircraft will be delivered but will only be used to move cargo, with no refueling missions. They're also saying the IFR receptacle
is good for 5,000 contacts.
Boeing was always our least favourite contractor/customer. It probably goes Boeing followed by Airbus/Boeing defense in a close race with the last
two.
And now we have a fun little cluster mess going on. First delivery is delayed until next year officially. They were waiting on Mattis to sign the
paperwork clearing the delivery, on the day he announced his resignation. So it was delayed slightly, but then came the accelerated departure, and
the announcement of Shanahan taking over. Since Shanahan is former Boeing, he's required to recuse himself from any decisions involving them, so it's
not entirely clear who will accept delivery of the aircraft and clear them to go forward. The most likely candidates are either SecAF Heather Wilson,
or the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen Lord.
At the same time they announced accepting the first aircraft they announced they would withhold the maximum of $28M per aircraft delivered until
Boeing shows a good faith effort towards fixing the issues with the aircraft.
edit on 1/10/2019 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
edit on 1/10/2019 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason
given)
edit on 1/10/2019 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
I still can't, for the life of me, wrap my head around why Boeing didn't simply dust off the plans for the KC-10's boom and controller station from
the McD archives, adapt it to the 767 airframe, and call it a day.
According to
this article from the military geniuses at Forbes, the problems are really simple to fix. According to the author all they have to do to solve
the glare problem is turn so the sun is at a different angle.
That was my first thought, losing a generator is not that unusual in flight.
its what 3 or 4 class 1 discrepancies and at least 1 of them the USAF has already said they will pay to fix.
I figured this would be the end result, much like the C-17 on its release, heard through the grape vine it was such a POS that the army refused to
jump out of it.
Yea its a good platform now... but how much money did the tax payers have to spend to make it a good plane.