Trump calls Stormy Daniels 'Horseface'

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: burdman30ott6

What is with Trumpkins who white knight Dear Leader repeatedly calling Stormy Daniels a "whore?" Does that make you feel some sort of way? Like she's the really immoral one in this situation. "She's a whore! A whore! A whore! A whore!"

And Donald Trump is a disgusting piece of # who left wife number whatever with a newborn to go get his fat pasty ass spanked with a roll upped magazine like a gimp.

It's like calling Avenatti "Creepy porn lawyer" in defense of the creepy dude who told the pornstar chick he was raw dogging that she reminded him of his daughter. Jesus. Better hope he doesn't get caught up in some orgy scandal. You'll need to grow extra hands to come up with enough fingers to point at everyone who was there except Trump.

What's with the anti-Trumpers and the constant speech policing? This is something I've never understood. Does it make you feel some sort of way?

a reply to: theantediluvian

A whore is one who takes money for sex... sort of the definition of a pornstar, yes? I've never called Avanatti "creepy porn lawyer," I call him the "ambulance chaser" among other things, because that's what the asshat is.

As for the whore's account of what happened and what was said behind closed doors, I find a coked out whore's word to be worthless. She's going to say whatever she believed would both portray her as a sympathetic figure and sell her story, thus... embellishments. To my knowledge, assuming they did hook up, Trump has never spoken of it nor has he used it to make money or further his fame... can she say the same?

originally posted by: Sabrechucker

Yes I stole This MEME

That horse is a little long in the tooth...

'Creepy Porn Lawyer' seems to love taking advantage of mentally unstable women making wild uncorroborated accusations...in order to forward his personal ambitions.

Wasn't 'Kavanaugh Gang Rape Girl' his OTHER client?

Anyone else see the pattern?

a reply to: burdman30ott6

i didnt mention anything about bragging.

my point is trump and all of you are constantly dogging her but he is the one that #ed her.
its funny to me

no white knight about it



my point is you all think she is a piece of # and you think he is mr #ing awesome.

just like i suspect a lot of you want the violence to continue so you can play commando i also suspect that a great many of you would have happily #ed her had she given you the time of day.

of course you will say bull# to that. not you.

but i dont believe you

a reply to: efabian

Thats a MARE!

a reply to: IAMTAT

Never look a gift horseface in the mouth.






Ew

a reply to: neo96

They sure don't give two effs about Bill cheating MANY TIMES on Hilary.

And yet Trumps 'bad'.

This is part you seem to be missing. Nobody actually cares if Trump screws an actual horse. That's why they didn't really care that Bill Clinton was a philanderer (funny that you put MANY TIMES in caps as though Trump hasn't cheated on MANY WIVES with MANY WOMEN).

Republicans on the other hand were so concerned about the morality of a little cigar action in the Oval that they impeached Clinton.

So they gave MANY EFFS or at least, as Xcaliber was pointing out, pretended to give them — when in reality, all that self-righteous posturing was just as fake as all the other supposed "traditional family value" bull# spewed by "conservative" hypocrites.

But SWEET BABY JEEBUS don't you dare expect them to sell a cake to a gay couple! Because the BYYYYBULL is serious business!

a reply to: TinySickTears

Again, who's the more despicable... the individual who kept a private consensual act private or the one who has tried to turn it into a money making opportunity and a smear of the other party?

ETA: I'd turn her down, simply because I'm a married man and my vows mean something to me. Your mileage may vary.

One laid on their back for a living and one laid the foundation for Making America Great Again.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Not to defend, but one thing doesn't really preclude the other.
You can think she is a piece of # but given the chance have a little fun with her.. like why not?
Given one is single (or equivalent)... and within your range of course.

a reply to: theantediluvian

The part someone is missing.

The left has exactly ZERO right to even try to admonish the Right on their religious beliefs.

Get over it.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Ahhhh bullhorse. We've said time and time and time and time again that we didn't elect Trump for his personal life, we elected him to turn this country around and currently he's doing a damn fine job.

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Mahogany

Well, she tried. Damn horseface shot herself in the foot while trying to rally up the radical anti-Trumpers.

I've never cheated on my wife, but when I was 21, I was sleeping with my then GF's best friend for about 6 months. It was basically like cheating on Jennifer Lopez (but smaller hips) with Stacy Keibler.

Shame on you, six months and you couldn’t talk them into a three way?

originally posted by: theantediluvian
Republicans on the other hand were so concerned about the morality of a little cigar action in the Oval that they impeached Clinton.

It happened in the Oval Office, on the tax payer's property, tax payers' dime, and with an underling paid by the tax payers. What part of that confuses you, Ante? You're comparing a private, pre-political office situation to one which represented a huge liability, both informational security-wise, reputational, and financial to the country.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Mahogany
Haven't heard of that one.

Yeah, it was in the news recently.

And, even for you? That part right there scares me, buddy. What sort of fauna are you into?

Midgets! Although my 140" 4D TV makes them 5' tall so it kinda defeats the purpose.

I still, to this day, can't understand why "midget" is an offensive term to them. I'd much rather be called that than a little person or dwarf or any such thing.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Again, who's the more despicable... the individual who kept a private consensual act private or the one who has tried to turn it into a money making opportunity and a smear of the other party?

It's nonsense, just like every other media-induced scandal. No one gives a damn about Stormy airing a man's secrets, his private affairs, even what his junk looks like, the media's sensationalistic take on it, so long as they can use it to Trump bash. Their principles are as squishy as a sponge, and then they turn around to malign the man's principles (or lack thereof).

a reply to: theantediluvian

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: theantediluvian
Republicans on the other hand were so concerned about the morality of a little cigar action in the Oval that they impeached Clinton.

It happened in the Oval Office, on the tax payer's property, tax payers' dime, and with an underling paid by the tax payers. What part of that confuses you, Ante? You're comparing a private, pre-political office situation to one which represented a huge liability, both informational security-wise, reputational, and financial to the country.

With a college intern, not a 40 year old porn star

originally posted by: efabian
a reply to: TinySickTears

Not to defend, but one thing doesn't really preclude the other.
You can think she is a piece of # but given the chance have a little fun with her.. like why not?
Given one is single (or equivalent)... and within your range of course.

cause im not like that

if i think someone is a piece of # i am not going to have a little fun with them.
if you would that makes you a piece of #