It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Elizabeth Warren releases DNA results to prove she is partially Native American

page: 11
23
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker


Clearly enough for her to get a house on a reservation and get some of that sweet sweet casino money.




I don't think that would qualify her for anything really.

Especially not college funds....




posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: narrator

He's not a stand up guy



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: CriticalStinker


Clearly enough for her to get a house on a reservation and get some of that sweet sweet casino money.




I don't think that would qualify her for anything really.

Especially not college funds....


1/1024.

She committed Fraud.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: CriticalStinker


Clearly enough for her to get a house on a reservation and get some of that sweet sweet casino money.




I don't think that would qualify her for anything really.

Especially not college funds....


1/1024.

She committed Fraud.


Yep - she lied to get ahead, but I am not surprised. Are you?



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: narrator

Real SCIENCE doesn't rig the outcome.



What's been rigged? Show some proof, ANY proof, of this being rigged, or stop saying that, as it isn't true and doesn't bring anything to this discussion.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Here's the major difference where you are WRONG!!

Was he CONVICTED for committing a "violent felony" 25 years ago??? Was Cavanaugh even CHARGED with a "violent felony" 25 years ago??. NO, no he wasn't! Was there even a police report filed 25 years ago?? NO, no there wasn't!!

Warren, on the other hand, openly admits to filling out the forms stating her minority status 25 years ago!!!

BIG DIFFERENCE!!!

BOOM...YOU'RE BUSTED! (liberal hypocrite)



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: narrator


Her test proved she had about the same or less than the average European-American.
She basically proved she is no more Native Indian than the next European American.
Thanks Pochahontas


EDIT: In spite of Pochahontas proving she is not a Native Indian, I do think that Trump shold cough up $976. Fair is fair.


Where in all of the back and forth about this was a percentage ever mentioned? When he called her out multiple times about this, did he say it had to be a certain percentage? No, he didn't. Therefore, the percentage doesn't matter.

Now, I think it's a laughable percentage that shouldn't have gotten her any form of benefit. BUT, in this discussion of Trump v. Warren, she is right, he was wrong. She has Native American DNA. The amount is irrelevant.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

No, that is not what he said. If you actually listen to it,
he is using a hypothetical debate in the future that
has not happened and what he "would say to her".






posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: narrator

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: narrator

Real SCIENCE doesn't rig the outcome.



What's been rigged? Show some proof, ANY proof, of this being rigged, or stop saying that, as it isn't true and doesn't bring anything to this discussion.


Have you seen the test results?
Have they been assessed by someone who could tell us whether Pochahontas is ay more American Indian than Mitt Romney or any other NON Native Indian you could think of?



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: narrator

Yeah, it is relevant. Trump is ripping the piss out of her for claiming she is an American Indian. He didn't mention a percentage. He asked her to take a DNA test to prove she is an American Indian. She took one. She isn't.

I think you got carried away with the percentage. A tiny percentage of DNA does not count as confirmation - it counts as proof that she is NOT an American Indian. It would be no different from a white European taking a DNA test to prove they were African. The DNA would shown some African DNA, of course, but they'd still be a white European.


edit on 15/10/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth


I'll bet I've got more American Indian blood than Pocahontas does!



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Wouldn't that mean Warren has more in common with an orangutan then she does a Native American? Go figure.....



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: narrator

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: narrator

Real SCIENCE doesn't rig the outcome.



What's been rigged? Show some proof, ANY proof, of this being rigged, or stop saying that, as it isn't true and doesn't bring anything to this discussion.


Have you seen the test results?
Have they been assessed by someone who could tell us whether Pochahontas is ay more American Indian than Mitt Romney or any other NON Native Indian you could think of?


No, I haven't. And even if I did, I wouldn't know what I was reading. Which is why an expert in the field did the analysis and explained it to us.
Time to flip it: Have you seen the test results? Can you prove they're inaccurate?

The amount of Native DNA isn't the question, it's the presence of it in her.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: narrator

Yeah, it is relevant. Trump is ripping the piss out of her for claiming she is an American Indian. He didn't mention a percentage. He asked her to take a DNA test to prove she is an American Indian. She took one. She isn't.






Were those his exact words? Because she never claimed that she IS, she claimed that she had SOME.
This entire time we've all been arguing over the AMOUNT of Native DNA in her blood, not whether she is or isn't Native American. It's always been 100% obvious that she isn't a Native American. What was up for debate was if she had SOME in her.

And, she does.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:10 PM
link   
a reply to: narrator


I believe her. I choose to.
The DNA test showed she was not an American Indian. Trump asked her to take the DNA test to prove she was.
So she proved Trump was correct in ripping the piss out of her claims.
Nobody mentioned percentages. You realise that 1/1024th doesn't make her an American Indian, right?



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: narrator


Yes they were his words in the video linked above.
He asked her to prove she was an American Indian with a DNA test. He didn't ask her to prove she had about the same American Indian DNA as the next guy...
What do you think her DNA test revealed?
It's only seems to be Pochahontas, you and CNN mentioning the amount of DNA.

Most others are asking the basic question Trump posed. Is she an American Indian. We got our answer.
She isn't.


edit on 15/10/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

You already know the answer to your question, right?

HA...I'd put put good money down that Warren is related genetically FAR closer to Trump than she is to any American Indian!!!

Wouldn't THAT be a hoot to prove!!!



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: narrator


Yes they were his words in the video linked above.
He asked her to prove she was an American Indian with a DNA test. He didn't ask her to prove she had about the same American Indian DNA as the next guy...
What do you think her DNA test revealed?
It's only seems to be Pochahontas, you and CNN mentioning the amount of DNA.

Most others are asking the basic question Trump posed. Is she an American Indian. We got our answer.
She isn't.



You're right, that is what he said. In my opinion, that makes this whole thing even more petty and ridiculous. She herself never claimed to be a full blooded Native American. She claimed to have some Native DNA in her.

I think this changes my opinion about the money, he gets off on a technicality and doesn't have to pay up. Although, I still think he should. That would change a lot of people's perceptions of him.

I'd like to be very clear though: Elizabeth Warren was proven right. She claimed she was part Native American. And technically, she is.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
He's not a stand up guy


You see that pic of him? He's too fat to stand up, gravity isn't his friend.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: UKTruth

You already know the answer to your question, right?

HA...I'd put put good money down that Warren is related genetically FAR closer to Trump than she is to any American Indian!!!

Wouldn't THAT be a hoot to prove!!!



Trump should take a DNA test and show his percentage of African DNA (that we all have) - then claim he is black.
I wonder would those rattling on about 1024th's accept it, or would they call him racist and accuse him of cultural appropriation for saying he is black?



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join