It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why democrats will destroy America

page: 7
50
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 02:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
you all have out kicked your coverage..

considering the desperation lately by the trump team and his chumps i'm thinking you know that.

projecting at it finist.

Finist? Is that like prejudice against Finnish peoples? You must be Russian.

I agree that the dems need to be a viable party to keep things honest but at this point IMO the party is in terrible shape and will take a practical miracle to turn around anytime soon. They’ve dig themselves this hole with continual backing untenable positions.




posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 02:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: ketsuko


But then Steve Scalise was shot and nearly died because someone disagreed with his politics.

I think we passed that Rubicon.


Because nuts have never shot anyone before over politics?


I’m not gunna do it....I’m not gunna do it.....damnit im doing it



Do you have proof of someone able to shoot someone with their nuts????
Take that how ever you want.
edit on 2/19/2013 by Allaroundyou because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 02:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just wish we had reasoned, sensible democrats.

I may not agree with all their approaches, but it was never anti-Constitutional.

I don't trust the republicans. I think they have just as much propensity to violate the Constitution if given the chance.


However... more and more establishment Republican progressives going out, more actual conservatives coming in.... think Freedom Caucus.

I see the Republicans at having a chance to get their party back... versus the Democratic party, which seems to be swirling down the toilet.

Good riddance... maybe then the Libertarians can become the new balance.



Libertarian party lost me when they went for open borders....


The last Libertarian POTUS candidate was a commie. I voted DJT



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 02:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just wish we had reasoned, sensible democrats.

I may not agree with all their approaches, but it was never anti-Constitutional.

I don't trust the republicans. I think they have just as much propensity to violate the Constitution if given the chance.


However... more and more establishment Republican progressives going out, more actual conservatives coming in.... think Freedom Caucus.

I see the Republicans at having a chance to get their party back... versus the Democratic party, which seems to be swirling down the toilet.

Good riddance... maybe then the Libertarians can become the new balance.



Libertarian party lost me when they went for open borders....


The last Libertarian POTUS candidate was a commie. I voted DJT


He wasn’t a commie, just a stoner.
edit on 2/19/2013 by Allaroundyou because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 02:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: toysforadults
they are still the same uni party

we are watching a puppet show, the banks are still advancing their agenda, everyone is still advancing their agenda and you guys are all waiting on Q to swoop in from the sky and save you with the secret military intelligence that's helping him give the world back to the people

yikes

I better bang my head off the wall a few times and wake myself up from all this mind control, it's like my brain has been hijacked


You are absolutely right. There are public policies that address this:

www.quandl.com...

But everything else is just a puppet show to preserve the status quo. George Carlin was absolutely right 20 years ago and even more right today: "THERE IS A REASON":


George would be slammed for his comedy today by the left.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 02:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just wish we had reasoned, sensible democrats.

I may not agree with all their approaches, but it was never anti-Constitutional.

I don't trust the republicans. I think they have just as much propensity to violate the Constitution if given the chance.


However... more and more establishment Republican progressives going out, more actual conservatives coming in.... think Freedom Caucus.

I see the Republicans at having a chance to get their party back... versus the Democratic party, which seems to be swirling down the toilet.

Good riddance... maybe then the Libertarians can become the new balance.



Libertarian party lost me when they went for open borders....


The last Libertarian POTUS candidate was a commie. I voted DJT


He wasn’t a commie, just a stoner.


IDK, he made me not vote Libertarian for the POTUS for the 1st time in 20 years.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 03:06 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

bring up japanese internment camps = the mmost pureile " argument

it was an act of folly during a world war

the democarts - thanks to " pecular circunstances " controlled the executive branch from 1933 to 1953

thats 20 years govt control - and all you can muster from that era = one act that lasted 3 years - in the middle of a world war ??????????????



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 03:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just wish we had reasoned, sensible democrats.

I may not agree with all their approaches, but it was never anti-Constitutional.

I don't trust the republicans. I think they have just as much propensity to violate the Constitution if given the chance.


However... more and more establishment Republican progressives going out, more actual conservatives coming in.... think Freedom Caucus.

I see the Republicans at having a chance to get their party back... versus the Democratic party, which seems to be swirling down the toilet.

Good riddance... maybe then the Libertarians can become the new balance.



Libertarian party lost me when they went for open borders....


The last Libertarian POTUS candidate was a commie. I voted DJT


He wasn’t a commie, just a stoner.


IDK, he made me not vote Libertarian for the POTUS for the 1st time in 20 years.


I know a few people that voted for that hippie. They would always say “it’s just pot bro” as if that is going to convince me to vote for that dumba##. I don’t vote in the general election just the primary and state elections. But if I would’ve it would have been DJT. I may think he is also a dingbat but Hillary would’ve just been the worst. And to think a lot of people didn’t like Obama, could you imagine if that witch got elected?



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 03:31 AM
link   
What a bias thread, no surprise really though. A more realistic title would be " why angry stupid people will destroy America ".
edit on 12-10-2018 by hopenotfeariswhatweneed because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 06:57 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015




There's nothing wrong with socialism. Marx's criticisms of laissez faire capitalism are spot on:


The 14th amendment says otherwise.

Reading is fundamental.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 07:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

I was born in the early 70's.

It's what I remember.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 07:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just wish we had reasoned, sensible democrats.

I may not agree with all their approaches, but it was never anti-Constitutional.

I don't trust the republicans. I think they have just as much propensity to violate the Constitution if given the chance.


However... more and more establishment Republican progressives going out, more actual conservatives coming in.... think Freedom Caucus.

I see the Republicans at having a chance to get their party back... versus the Democratic party, which seems to be swirling down the toilet.

Good riddance... maybe then the Libertarians can become the new balance.



Libertarian party lost me when they went for open borders....


The last Libertarian POTUS candidate was a commie. I voted DJT


Nah, he wasn't a commie. He was just the same old, same old ... just washing it all down with legal weed.

I was disappointed, too. Had the libertarians actually nominated a real libertarian, not just a liberaltarian (libertine), they could have made an impact.

Of course, we'd now have president Hillary because I don't think true libertariansim was going to peel proggies, only 'pubs, like a lot of us who weren't exactly thrilled with Trump, but scared sh1tless of Hillary.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 07:40 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Ask any of those people if being packed off to an internment camp was puerile and a folly. Ask them if only being three years makes the indignity somehow less.

We could talk about FDR's obsession with Supreme Court Packing because the Court he had kept striking down his policies. Look at what the Democrats are doing now.

We could talk about economic policies that actually prolonged the Depression.

Yeah, there are lots of things we could talk about, but downplaying the thing that gets harped on all the time in this modern era of grievance so everyone knows about it?



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: ketsuko
...
But then Steve Scalise was shot and nearly died because someone disagreed with his politics.

I think we passed that Rubicon.

What's next? Who's going to be all John Brown for the left? Are we going to reach that point? Will there be a Harper's Ferry?


Several recent events have shown the far left, which is leading the democrats, resort to violence. You can bet 100% that the Vegas massacre was another far left-winger who wanted to kill as many conservatives as possible. We will unfortunately see more events like these, and even more attempts at our conservative/Republican politicians because the DNC in general is calling for such violence, and there are many crazy left-wingers more than willing to abide by the fascists in the DNC/left.


Gabriel Giffords, Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy crazy people on both sides have gone after politicians over the years. Dont try to make it something NEW that is happening because of the upcoming civil war conservatives are claiming is coming.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Gothmog

I was born in the early 70's.

It's what I remember.

So , you would not have been old enough to understand ?
Yet you commented as fact.
Still no information on why you believe the violent protests of the 80s were prolific and/or worse than today. That with nothing but a memory , you call out Republicans for being violent then as the Left is today ?
I call BS

And , BTW in the mid 70s I was graduating high school , in the service , and married with a son all before the 80s
Right here in the good old US even
Just an FYI 4 U




posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Check Giffords again. That guy wasn't anything but crazy. He was all over the map if I recall, so no one could put him in anyone's box.
edit on 12-10-2018 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: dfnj2015




There's nothing wrong with socialism. Marx's criticisms of laissez faire capitalism are spot on:


The 14th amendment says otherwise.

Reading is fundamental.


Ya, I am not seeing where in the 14th it bans communism or socialism.


Amendment XIV Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Pyle

Check Giffords again. That guy wasn't anything but crazy. He was all over the map if I recall, so no one could put him in anyone's box.



I said crazy people have been going after politicians for years before the imagined civil war that is coming started to be a thing. Thus why I listed Reagan and Kennedy as well as Giffords.
edit on 12-10-2018 by Pyle because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:08 AM
link   
I agree with you, both sides want it all, they are not willing to negotiate and they are becoming more and more extreme. It will tear this country apart as you said...



posted on Oct, 12 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Socialism deprives you of property.

Means of production are owned by the state. As of now, means of production are owned by private individuals or entities.




top topics



 
50
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join