It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why democrats will destroy America

page: 10
50
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 12:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Maroboduus

Good lord!

Another mindless rant concerning class warfare and not even addressing the issue that we (the great unwashed) will be paying higher taxes.




posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 02:42 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Don't worry. Latest tallies are coming in. Democrats will LOSE seats in the Senate, and NOT retake the House.


I said yesterday that our President is confident for all the right reasons for the upcoming November 6th Election. What the Democrats and MSM did to Justice Kavanaugh and his family has literally flipped this election on its head. The one thing I would concede is that Democrats had a double digit margin on enthusiasm. That has completely evaporated.

CNN today had to warn their lunatics that there may not be a Blue Wave and that Democrats may come up short in the House. They have acknowledged that there is no hope in the Senate.

Poll after poll have been terrible this past week for Democrats, not only running to retain their Senate seats, but in House Districts the Democrats thought they could flip and more importantly hold onto.


The latest Stats: twitter.com...

Rank-and-File Democrats should be VERY angry at their leaders. They sink the party a little lower on the power scale, every 2 years!



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
What a bias thread, no surprise really though. A more realistic title would be " why angry stupid people will destroy America ".

Yea only Democrats are willing to do anything to destroy the COTUS.




Both parties have extremists and both are complicit in this destruction.

But truly i see no Libertarian or R's that want to do away with the Bill of Rights while D's are starting to insist on it!!!



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 06:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: DBCowboy

a reply to: DBCowboy

When someone says that free healthcare and free education are somehow bad things, I immediately know that I'm dealing with an awful person, an idiot, and/or someone who is incapable of thinking for themselves and just gobbles up whatever idiocy Fox News feeds them.
Why would we want people to be educated and healthy? That's a terrible idea!
I work in the medical field. Do you have any idea how many people I see on a day-to-day basis that have no way to get the medication that they NEED to survive and live healthy lives? And these are working people. Hard-working people. Just to pre-empt the nonsense about handouts and paying for other peoples medication that im sure you parrot every time the subject arises. Need your medicine that helps you fight cancer? Sorry! It's a few hundred dollars! Have fun dying a slow and painful death so that DBCowboy doesnt have to pay a little bit extra on taxes! Need your inhaler because you cant breathe? Too bad, you're screwed! Its 300 bucks! Better choose between buying your meds, or paying your electric bill and house insurance!



Great idea if we could pay for it all. We should help those who can't help themselves but never at the end of a gun or thru use of a mob.



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Ansuzrune

You know what is very ironic? For years in these forums other members and myself have been talking about how similar the democrat's ideas and laws have been to the same ideas and laws implemented in socialist/communist regimes. Yet the answer from pretty much everyone in the left had always been "we are not socialist/communist and we do not agree with their policies/ideas/laws." Yet here we are, with not only the main democrats admitting to like socialism, and even communism (heck Obama's picks were all socialist/communists, including at least some NAMBLA perverts and sympathizers)

More than half of the people in the democrat party state that they like/would like to see socialism in the U.S... Give it a few months, or a couple years and more democrats will profess their love to socialism. This shift didn't happen overnight, it was there all along because democrats have always been "pro big government, pro business regulations that strangle and destroy most small to medium businesses, pro gun control, etc." Socialism/communism are exactly the same way. It just has taken democrats a while to realize the truth, that the majority of them are left-wing authoritarians who think they know what's best for everyone and want to force their ideals on everyone else who is not left-wing.




edit on 13-10-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 07:00 PM
link   
actually its just history past coming to haunt america. when you look what its built on it isnt sustainable and that is what the right is fighting against. Immigrants. a changing landscape. certain people can no longer demand respect and attention they do not deserve. im ok with it



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: magnetik
actually its just history past coming to haunt america. when you look what its built on it isnt sustainable and that is what the right is fighting against. Immigrants. a changing landscape. certain people can no longer demand respect and attention they do not deserve. im ok with it


Wrong...there is a difference between legal immigration, and illegal immigration. I am a legal immigrant whose parent's decided to leave Cuba and with the help of family in Spain we were able to go there "legally", and waited for nearly 10 years to legally enter the U.S.

Like my story, there are MILLIONS of legal immigrants who came to the U.S. the "right way." Illegal immigration is a slap to the face to those immigrants who went through the legal system to be able to immigrate into the U.S. Now the left want only to bring mostly illegal immigrants whom because of their lack of education they keep voting "left-wing," meanwhile the Obama administration closed the last legal policy that Cubans could use to seek asylum in the U.S. Cubans as a majority tend to vote Republican. The majority of the 2 million Cuban-Americans in south Florida voted for Trump for POTUS, and have voted Republican for decades. But the left want to stop such immigration, meanwhile demanding to allow illegal immigrants whose vote destroyed their nations and will transform the U.S. into yet another left-wing dictatorship.

As for the claim "the way the U.S. was build isn't sustainable, that's another lie... If you love left-wing dictatorship move to Cuba, or Venezuela insteadf of demanding that western nations like the U.ZS. should transform into left-wing dictatorships.

Venezuela has introduced strict policies to "combat climate change..." MOVE THERE...


edit on 13-10-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Well thought out and well said my friend.



posted on Oct, 13 2018 @ 11:54 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

The extremists have overtaken the Democratic Party and sold it to George Soros and the NWO. That is principally why Trump won. Hillary was unapologetic about her corruption and actually had the gall to accuse half of America of being Deplorable, when if anyone was Deplorable, it was her. When the Democrats come out of their crazyness and has a civil platform and non-socialist candidate, I might consider them again. As it stands the Democrats are not a consideration for the sane.



posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 04:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Go back and read the post.

It hasn't changed. You brought up the violence part.



posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 04:15 PM
link   
a reply to: AutisticEvo

Reread what I posted.

I'm not talking about Ronald.



posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 10:01 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580


Re read what I posted. You totally brought up Reagan.

Next time keep your responses organized

It's clear for all to see that I was replying to you about the only Reagan that ever matters or is even relevant in this discussion.

And yes mr was a child when he was in office, you were talking about ol Ron.

Nothing you said in that post implied different.
And in the POLITICAL mudpit, that's the only Reagan that could be meant without the poster clarifying different.

You are just trying to Backpedal and didn't know I'm the confrontation you cannot pedal away from.

Not even close. The onus of clarifying some other "Reagan" was and still is on you.

You are so done I'mma have to throw you to the dog and pull another stake out the ice box.

I'm putting a fork in this, and your credibility.
I was born in '82 btw.

In a Moscow Blizzard.

FYI
Btw you owe me 20 seconds of my time back for wasting it doing what you suggested just to be sure you were the one who needs to re read your post. Going senile old man?
edit on 14-10-2018 by AutisticEvo because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-10-2018 by AutisticEvo because: Spell check makes more arguments from ignorance than a leftist on meth



posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 11:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Ansuzrune

You know what is very ironic? For years in these forums other members and myself have been talking about how similar the democrat's ideas and laws have been to the same ideas and laws implemented in socialist/communist regimes. Yet the answer from pretty much everyone in the left had always been "we are not socialist/communist and we do not agree with their policies/ideas/laws." Yet here we are, with not only the main democrats admitting to like socialism, and even communism (heck Obama's picks were all socialist/communists, including at least some NAMBLA perverts and sympathizers)

More than half of the people in the democrat party state that they like/would like to see socialism in the U.S... Give it a few months, or a couple years and more democrats will profess their love to socialism. This shift didn't happen overnight, it was there all along because democrats have always been "pro big government, pro business regulations that strangle and destroy most small to medium businesses, pro gun control, etc." Socialism/communism are exactly the same way. It just has taken democrats a while to realize the truth, that the majority of them are left-wing authoritarians who think they know what's best for everyone and want to force their ideals on everyone else who is not left-wing.



your post here is so good damned spot on it deserves to be seen again and again. You should make a thread about the facts you listed alone.

Especially that last bit. Their authoritarianism is so evident especially in their words and actions.

They try to hide behind words like democracy but yet believe common decency, ethics, morality and respect for the opinions and views of others should be tossed to the wind because their game plan to convince all 50 states to blindly accept their ways failed.

They think it's not worth outrage when they take all those things I listed above and "Dump" on what we Call CIVILITY.

Even Australia, the meanest wildlife zone on the planet complete with people descended from criminal penal colonies are better behaved than this lot.

It is shameful on them that they have the nerve to try to make excuses for their disrespect, especially when those excuses sound like the ones we all heard in schoolyard playgrounds!

But thank you for your contribution, the truth in your statement can never be contradicted.

*Stands up....begins applause*

I salute you as a man who not only denies, but Rejects ignorance.



posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 11:35 PM
link   
a reply to: AutisticEvo

I guess reading is hard.



posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 01:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: AutisticEvo

I guess reading is hard.



You will get the hang of it if you read enough actual books. It's an acquired taste that shapes the skill.

Your wording has not inference that is signalled. It's choice clearly dictates a tone leading towards a negative outlook from the minds eye in visual translation.

You claimed that because Reagan won against a democrat president who has been criticised for his limp wristed incompetence lost due to some form of "Extremism" when he revitalized and revived the Peoples Faith in Conservatism.

You claim our sense of duty, sense of National brotherhood as we are all born and bred Americans no matter the Background or Geological placement of Ancestry is some form of Extremism.

You and most the left just never read anything about what we really stand for.

And by your comparison the only message that we can learn as a moral of the story is this:
If Extreme Enthusiastic Support for the Party that still believes even our opposers are human beings with American Rights who have the Support of the Constitution and Rule of Law can make this country better back in the Reagan Days then why not Again?

You claim to blame rebuplicans can only get things done and get attention through Violence.

PROVE IT.
The Onus of Evidence is on the Plaintiff.

Prove that not only Violence and Uncivility get it done...
WITHOUT using examples of war, unless you want to defend Hillary and Maxine call for a war by proxy.

Just Prove Republicans did that to win Every Time.

Cause you might not know this my Atari aged counterpart,
But our Party was Invented ORIGINALLY to END SLAVERY and Bring Civil rights to all Legal Denizens.

But I don't know if you are ready for citations or sources of proof that are credible and corroborated by more than 1 or two others showing solid general agreement.

You might not like how that goes since many of you don't use sources to back up your words.

You all can't even agree or even discuss the specific type of government you Think Trump is trying to run. Is it an autocracy, a oligarchy or a plutocracy?! You can't even convey the same accusations much less a coherent unity of message.

Its why you can't have an open dialogue with us.

You all are too busy blabbering hateful gibberish and can't even pick a specific dialogue to begin with us without flying way off course mid sentence.

Less adderall more Valium is what you all should consider.

But by all means explain your claims of extremism in the Reagan days and now.
This isn't Reddit buddy, you don't just get to talk without citing sources, unless you want to keep wasting your time and mine.

Your not winning any points with one liners.
That's also a back pedal
And weaksauce.
Stand by your words man.

You leftists always lose because you can't unite under one goal and even if you did you lack the CONVICTION NECESSARY to achieve them.

That's just my opinion, but go on, take a dump on that flier and see if it accomplished anything.
I'm just gonna grab another beer while I wait.



posted on Oct, 16 2018 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: AutisticEvo

That's amazing that you got all that from my comment.

It's like you are playing The Telephone Game.

This was my original comment. Please explain how you go all that crazy from my comment.


Republicans became extreme back in the Reagen days.


And btw. I see you're kinda new. Are you a gop shill?
edit on 16-10-2018 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2018 @ 01:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: AutisticEvo

That's amazing that you got all that from my comment.

It's like you are playing The Telephone Game.

This was my original comment. Please explain how you go all that crazy from my comment.


Republicans became extreme back in the Reagen days.


And btw. I see you're kinda new. Are you a gop shill?


You should probably of read how I deal with posts not cited or well thought out before replying.. you seem determined to keep digging that hole and I find it sad you didn't research more carefully your contradictor before now.

Cause below is a nice example of being burned well done... Enjoy your immolation.

Yeah, except nothing that defines extremism defines people's behaviour back then.

And you were referring g to Ronald Reagan's era of presidency so quit trying to make it sound like you weren't.

And which GOP shill would you be referencing? The never trumpers or his cabinet of support?

You keep avoiding clarification without sourcing claims but you claim my calling you out on the Reagan presidency is somehow a product of bad reading because you used the word "People" in your statement?

As far as I have read there was no notable "Extremists" in the R party during the Reagan days, and Reagan certainly did not condone any such thing nor was noted for it.

And to go further and claim we are "More Extreme" than back then? When there was no then, then?

I know they didn't really emphasize the importance of facts during the 70's but are you sure you aren't mixed up?

Like you know how KKK and Neo Nazis are supposedly right wing right?

You do know that they fully endorsed the Democratic party until the Dems realized no one in America wanted that anymore and turned their back on groups they supported until the early 80s right?

You do know the only reason they vote Republican now is because they were betrayed by Democrats, not because they think we have tolerance of their views or that anything we Ever Represented in any Way represents them.

So to call them right wing is kind of a misnomer when you realize they were cultured and nurtured by the Left that Still is Left today and just released into the wild.

I'm a Shill sure...I'm a Shill for Fact Based Truths.

And you finally, finally quoting the piece you thought I was confused about just goes to show I was still right.

But now we know one more thing I'm going to tell you I'm right about.

You clearly need to update your communication skills. You expected one word to change the context of your message and denied any miscommunication that could be your fault....

After first claiming you weren't talking about Ronald.

The error is on you.

And I have also been a lurker since 2002, and before that I was the first to call bullsh# after 9/11.

Truthers came later.

I also have some other accounts but my favorite got burned for various reasons I have not bothered to question the Mods about as I see where I might have scared a few members and upset some others, whom recently tasted my vengeance for the trouble.

Maybe you should try being more clear in the future instead of vague unsourced claims that do not specify what you implied.

Cause I've noticed no one has come to your defense, meaning they didn't see it the way you did either.

Think about that before your next "shill post" for the wall of Lies the Left is making.


edit on 17-10-2018 by AutisticEvo because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2018 @ 01:53 AM
link   
a reply to: grey580

Seriously, take a class in debate. And look up the definitions of words like extremism before using them next time.

And try to make arguments that don't falsely accuse or drop to the level of name calling or accusations of "shilling" just because someone doesn't agree with your point of view.

Facts go a long way when cited and sourced in any Debate.

And calling names doesn't sell arguments either, there's a saying "you attract more flies with Honey".

What I do, and how I post against leftist agendas, along with my organizational skills in managing whole teams of propagandists is an action rewarded by the sword of Truth.

The GOP would have to pay me 50,000 USD a week plus expenses if they wanted me to work for them on the regular.

And perhaps if the Democrats were smart spenders they would already have made an offer to get my level of Weaponized Autism working for them.

This might be hard to swallow but ATS is seeing me play nice here. You couldn't handle the Full Monty




posted on Oct, 17 2018 @ 07:14 AM
link   
a reply to: AutisticEvo

Nice wall of text.

After reading all that I still see that you are wrong. And I doubt that will change.

It was nice chatting with ya. Have a good one.



posted on Oct, 17 2018 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
Who's going to be all John Brown for the left? Are we going to reach that point? Will there be a Harper's Ferry?


I find the idea of A New Civil War as somewhat of a bad joke - that could get worse.

As we all know, it will not be a state versus state war, it will be a people verses people war.
So there are no physical boundaries, correct?

The Republicans do not even have an army, correct?
The Dems already have 2 armies: Black Lives Matter & Antifa - and those 2 would be happy to kill each other.




top topics



 
50
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join