It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Has Hillary gone completely insane

page: 5
84
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Nice try. But unfortunately for you it would be unconstitutional to take away the electoral college. Very few between the coasts want CA and NY deciding our elections. The day that happens will be the day you let something out of the bag that you'll never get back in.




posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 07:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I noticed that red flag, too. It's as corny and stupid as a gaggle of fascists calling themselves anti-fascists.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 07:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
She talks about civility yet she is spewing un-civility? I think she is losing it, she is becoming someone who wants conflict between our nations people. I think she needs to see a psychiatrist for her anger and delusion issues.


Maybe she can go to Blasey-Ford's shrink, or better yet, they can go together.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: queenofswords

Say what you will about Clinton but you might not want to follow her lead in dismissing and insulting people who aren't in your political demographic.


I have faith that the American People are waking up big league! We will fight fight fight back at the ballot box. But, the left's violent behavior won't be tolerated past a certain point...that I am sure of. Rule of Law will prevail.


People who aren't right-wingers are "violent" and not American? So you must be a neo-Nazi who runs over people in your car? I mean because some right-wingers do that. I mean, why don't you just call us "deplorable" Hillary?

Every single time Trump dismisses protesters with this "paid protesters" bull#, he energizes the opposition.

I wonder what you're going to say about the American people if the Republicans lose the House?


I'll say... Democrats are bailing out faster than they did in the late 70's. Real energized.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: queenofswords

She also supports abolishing the Electoral College. Let that sink in.


What's funny is that if the Leftists/statists believed in a limited federal government overseeing free states instead of lusting for authoritarian rule over everyone, they wouldn't need to abolish the electoral college because they'd be free to do nearly any social program/experiment they'd like on the coasts. Sadly liberty is an after thought because the leftist isn't content to be at liberty, he needs everyone to endorse his preferences -- or at minimumhave his preferences imposed on the rest of the country too foolish to see his wisdom -- all in the name of "liberty" and "freedom".



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Pyle

Nice try. But unfortunately for you it would be unconstitutional to take away the electoral college. Very few between the coasts want CA and NY deciding our elections. The day that happens will be the day you let something out of the bag that you'll never get back in.


Maybe you need to read up on the amendment process?

Article 5 of the US constitution.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Sure. We could call a convention of states and replace the elected government with a Politburo and it'd be "supporting the Constitution" in the same way you use the term here, you word weasel.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: openminded2011

She called trump supporters deplorable. That will never be 47% of the population. Not in your wildest dreams.


It is if you remove the illegals that vote for democrats.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Pyle

Sure. We could call a convention of states and replace the elected government with a Politburo and it'd be "supporting the Constitution" in the same way you use the term here, you word weasel.


We could in fact do that and as long as its done in accordance with the constitution it would be legal. Not sure where you are going with this as the constitution was made to be able to be changed.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Pyle

Nice try. But unfortunately for you it would be unconstitutional to take away the electoral college. Very few between the coasts want CA and NY deciding our elections. The day that happens will be the day you let something out of the bag that you'll never get back in.


Maybe you need to read up on the amendment process?

Article 5 of the US constitution.


Then why don't we just change the entire process and give each state the same amount of electoral votes for purposes of equality. That would benefit me since Republicans would never lose a presidency again. After all, fair is fair.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 08:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Pyle

Nice try. But unfortunately for you it would be unconstitutional to take away the electoral college. Very few between the coasts want CA and NY deciding our elections. The day that happens will be the day you let something out of the bag that you'll never get back in.


Maybe you need to read up on the amendment process?

Article 5 of the US constitution.


Then why don't we just change the entire process and give each state the same amount of electoral votes for purposes of equality. That would benefit me since Republicans would never lose a presidency again. After all, fair is fair.


That is the dream of some. GOP have been pushing for control of states for very similar reasons to your example. Though I am not sure why conservatives always go straight to authoritarianism in examples. Was removing the 3/5th compromise evil?



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963


This kind of talk just tells me the CFR/Globalist WANT the USA to have a civil war! Hell, the Democrats in our Congress have been promoting violence ever since Trump was elected.


I don't think the CFR or the Globalist have a clue as to the tenacity of us Americans who remained Civil, Restrained and Peaceful while watching people being spit on, beat upon and called Nazi's, Racists, Bigots and then to top it all off? Being WHITE is BAD!


BRING IT!


This is absolutely their plan, I have no doubt given their very trasnparent and predictable behavior. (IE: I predicted two days in advance that Avenatti would start parading a bunch of liars to falsely accuse Kavanaugh - which backfired on creepy porn lawyer BIGGLY)

Nothing but planned provocation since minute-1. However, as usual, they significantly underestimate patriots and how much we love our country and our Constitution. Perhaps worse of all, they under-estimate our resolve for defending and upholding the Constitution without apology or pre-conditions (ie: it WILL be upheld, always, period no discussion). They under-estimated this because they are a bunch of yuppie anti-American open border globalists who see our great and precious immutable Constitution as a blockade - something in the way of their failed ideology, a barrier to their bastard leftist diktat they want to impose on us through force.

Not happening! This we'll defend. If anything, we need a Constitutional convention so we can further cement our pro-American values and ensure the Constitution always reigns supreme - untouchable by those who seek to destroy it or weaken it. We have enough State-houses without having to control 2/3s of the House and Senate.
edit on 10/10/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Yes. sick, dumb and ugly too. In addition to unhinged, psychotic, sycophantic, power-hungry and completely morally bankrupt.

I am surprised anyone still gives this "person" the time of day. Trust me, it isn't worth it. Nothing she has to say that we don't already know is true/know is false.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Pyle

Sure. We could call a convention of states and replace the elected government with a Politburo and it'd be "supporting the Constitution" in the same way you use the term here, you word weasel.


So look dude, if you think it's not legal/moral/constitutional to change the constitution through state conventions, then you don't get to hide "muh gunz" behind the constitution either, you know that's an amendment right?



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:06 AM
link   
Check this out...

Everything HRC accuses the Rep's of doing, she is guilty of doing it by her statement. It's as IF she says it first, then there's a pretend protective shield around her and can't be accused of the same act.

For example...
HRC states, "I didn't spit in your hamburger". YES she did
"You colluded with Russians". No you did HRC



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: openminded2011
a reply to: queenofswords



I find it comical when she makes the assertion that Trump thinks

"some people don't belong". This woman called 47 percent of the country "deplorables". This is transference. She is guilty of everything she accuses Trump of and worse. I often wonder what shape we would be if if this witch had managed to win the

election. The funny thing to me is the group that SHE doesn't think belong are ordinary Americans, she would have given the country over to illegals and refugees just like her soul sister Angela Merkel.


Hint Hillary, not everyone DOES belong here. If they came illegally or don't want to assimilate to our culture, they need to leave.



It's interesting here that you use an exact measurement of deplorables. 47%??? Did she have a graph? Did she show her work? Or have you (or more likely the trash brain washing you for the Koch brothers) made that number up?



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Its cool. We got the uncivilized bit mastered to a fine art.

Lets be savages!



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Pyle

Nice try. But unfortunately for you it would be unconstitutional to take away the electoral college. Very few between the coasts want CA and NY deciding our elections. The day that happens will be the day you let something out of the bag that you'll never get back in.


Maybe you need to read up on the amendment process?

Article 5 of the US constitution.


Then why don't we just change the entire process and give each state the same amount of electoral votes for purposes of equality. That would benefit me since Republicans would never lose a presidency again. After all, fair is fair.


That is the dream of some. GOP have been pushing for control of states for very similar reasons to your example. Though I am not sure why conservatives always go straight to authoritarianism in examples. Was removing the 3/5th compromise evil?


What's authoritarian about it equality? You want NY and CA to decide our elections, that's not equality like the left love to preach about. Giving every state the same number of electoral votes would be equal. Why do you suddenly have an issue with equality?

BTW, I've always supported states rights. But that has no bearing on the current electoral college.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: CADpro
Check this out...

Everything HRC accuses the Rep's of doing, she is guilty of doing it by her statement. It's as IF she says it first, then there's a pretend protective shield around her and can't be accused of the same act.

For example...
HRC states, "I didn't spit in your hamburger". YES she did
"You colluded with Russians". No you did HRC


All lefties do that, for that very reason. They've pushed blacks aside for years and only used them when it was election time, only to shove them back into their corner and they've been that way since the dawn of the party, but won't hesitate to point and call you a racist. They'll collude with other members of their party against another member of their own party and then turn around and point at you and say you colluded to win. They'll bully Congress members and then turn around and call you a bully. They'll attack you and beat you for your political beliefs and then say they did it because you're a fascist. Their hypocrisy and stupidity know no bounds.



posted on Oct, 10 2018 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: caterpillage
a reply to: InTheLight

There's room for both hate and love in this world.
Were very versatile creatures.

Hey, can I PM you with a cat question?


The longer you marinate, the less chewy.




top topics



 
84
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join