It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump may get 5 supreme court justices or more.

page: 1
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:24 PM
link   
Keep an open mind and hear me out.

What if all the things Trump has been accused of and investigated for are actually what they want to try (in court) the past administration for?

A precedent has been set. What Trump was investigated for any past president can be investigated for.

Now, what if obama gets investigated? I mean really investigated by an honest FBI and an honest DOJ. IMO he would be in trouble. Big trouble.

He appointed Kagan and Sotomayor.

Do Kagan and Sotomayor have to go? Has a precedent been set?

#5 is RBG

Trump remakes the supreme Court.

4D chess.
edit on 8-10-2018 by Aallanon because: (no reason given)



+3 more 
posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon


I don't know about 5...BUT Trump will definitely fill Ginsburg's slot and...




(sorry, I just threw up in my mouth)



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Do Kagan and Sotomayor have to go? Has a precedent been set?


No, they were confirmed by the Senate.



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jason79

Do Kagan and Sotomayor have to go? Has a precedent been set?


No, they were confirmed by the Senate.


So was Kavanaugh.




posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aallanon


I don't know about 5...BUT Trump will definitely fill Ginsburg's slot and...




(sorry, I just threw up in my mouth)


Sweet Jesus... did you HAVE to put that mental image in my head?

~Wandering off to find some kind of brain soap~



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aallanon


I don't know about 5...BUT Trump will definitely fill Ginsburg's slot and...




(sorry, I just threw up in my mouth)


Sweet Jesus... did you HAVE to put that mental image in my head?

~Wandering off to find some kind of brain soap~

I could stick around a lil longer

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aallanon


I don't know about 5...BUT Trump will definitely fill Ginsburg's slot and...




(sorry, I just threw up in my mouth)


Wash the filth from my mind...



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:42 PM
link   
Ginsburg does need to go.

Trump may get one more nomination after that it depends on 2020 and who wins.


edit on 8-10-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon

Aside from the claim you made that has almost no statistical chance.....

I voted for Trump because he wasn't Hillary.

I don't trust him, and I sure as hell hope he doesn't get that many picks.

I don't think everything he has done is bad, but I've never been a Trump supporter, and haven't seen enough yet to hope he gets all those picks.

Just remember he isn't a true concervative (I'm not one either, just saying), he's an opportunist, and a good one at that. My guess is he was a Democrat because that was hip and jibe in NYC, then he saw the Republicans putting the absolute worst candidates up for president and saw his chance.
edit on 8-10-2018 by CriticalStinker because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Jason79

Perhaps if the circumstances surrounding the nomination were illegal, but otherwise no -- I agree with you.

For instance, suppose Obama colluded with Russia on SCOTUS nominations and took money from Russian interest groups in exchange for nominating a particular justice, and that justice was aware, then the justice could be impeached and indicted. A crime committed by Obama alone would be his and only his problem.



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Word is Stephen Breyer goes next, then RBG.

Then maybe Thomas ( to guarantee a Conservative nominee).

😎



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aallanon


I don't know about 5...BUT Trump will definitely fill Ginsburg's slot and...




(sorry, I just threw up in my mouth)


Sweet Jesus... did you HAVE to put that mental image in my head?

~Wandering off to find some kind of brain soap~




That's ALL on YOU! Dammit, I didn't think that way until you mentioned it! Off to drown my thoughts...



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 09:15 PM
link   
Is it rude to ask if RBG is “alive” in the same way Bernie was alive that one weekend?

-Chris



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Can you imagine how this country would change if we went back to following the constitution instead of trying to change it?



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 09:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon

Interestingly, no one has suggested that a few of the current SCs may be under investigation for wrong doing.

That could well lead to impeachment.

Jobs for the boys and gals may well backfire.

P



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

Sotomayor was affiliated with La Raza

Who else might be under investigation?



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 10:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Christosterone
Is it rude to ask if RBG is “alive” in the same way Bernie was alive that one weekend?

-Chris


No. In fact the truth is she doesn’t even have the strength to wear normal clothes. I manage nursing homes for a living. The last video she was in she was wearing the same throwover things our total care residents wear when they “get up”.
Ironically I was defending her mind in that thread but I felt weird in the moment.I knew I was probably wrong, but I was trying to be fair. She has hired a team of consultants that tell her what to think and how to interpret. Now she is just an idea. A figurehead of an ideology she was voted to represent



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 10:35 PM
link   

Trump may get 5 supreme court justices or more


Good, because it's probably the only way we're going to save the Constitution.



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 11:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: pheonix358

Sotomayor was affiliated with La Raza

Who else might be under investigation?


Well, we know the past Presidents that are bad people, both Bushes, Clinton, Obama.

Any of the Justices they put in would be suspect since they only put their own players in.

I would suggest that this is already in play in a big way.

Wait and see.

P



posted on Oct, 8 2018 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: drewlander

It would take 75% of the Senate to impeach a Justice, I can't picture a democrat voting to remove their own. However, if they were impeaching conservative Justices, I could picture republicans making the dumbest possible decisions regarding the circumstances.




top topics



 
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join