It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Will Christine B Ford Be held accountable? perjury obstruction making false claims FBI results?

page: 4
29
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 02:41 PM
link   
So Can we verify the facts? with statements taken and facts of her story and also her connections to DC, FBI CIA ect. Written papers "Private Practice w separate doors and Licensing requirements in CA ?? Criminal records scrubbed ?

Lets really verify each Fact one by one LOOK deeply at this woman and everyone that's involved in the dog and pony show that just evolved last week .

I think the American people deserve answers it was their TAXES THAT WERE USED for this DC production.....

Sexual Assault should be a serious Charge in whatever shape it takes and a CONCLUSION should be decided
with accountability for fabrication.




posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 03:05 PM
link   
There is a reason why the legislative and judicial branches are separated.

When the legislative starts declaring guilt without ever being inside a courtroom.

The Republic is dead.
edit on 7-10-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 03:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: TheJesuit

Just because the week long FBI investigation that didn't interview key witnesses didn't substantiate her claims doesn't mean she's guilty of perjury. There's no evidence she maliciously lied under oath.

It seems like you're claiming Ford is guilty without any evidence. I seem to recall a hearing recently that involved a lot of people repeating the phrase "innocent until proven guilty." I wonder why those same people no longer believe those words when it comes to Ford.


Let her be investigated by the FBI for perjury. That seems fair. Surely, given the screeches for an FBI investigation to see if Kavanaugh was lying, the same should be applied to Dr Ford?



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheJesuit
So Can we verify the facts? with statements taken and facts of her story and also her connections to DC, FBI CIA ect. Written papers "Private Practice w separate doors and Licensing requirements in CA ?? Criminal records scrubbed ?

Lets really verify each Fact one by one LOOK deeply at this woman and everyone that's involved in the dog and pony show that just evolved last week .

I think the American people deserve answers it was their TAXES THAT WERE USED for this DC production.....

Sexual Assault should be a serious Charge in whatever shape it takes and a CONCLUSION should be decided
with accountability for fabrication.


That's the difference between a background check and a criminal investigation. Background checks aren't supposed to be made public. There's nothing to look at here. I have concerns about how limited in scope the FBI investigation was based on the reports of who was and wasn't interviewed but as far as any of us are concerned, there's really nothing to look at.

I don't think the FBI investigation was done properly, but it was still done and given how long ago this happened I think the only two results we can get here are innocent or inconclusive. Enough has been presented to make it inconclusive which is the closest towards guilt it can possibly get.

So what it comes down to is this: Are you comfortable with a Supreme Court justice who may be a serial rapist, or would you prefer one with an identical ideology who we can conclusively say is not a serial rapist?
edit on 7-10-2018 by Aazadan because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Let her be investigated by the FBI for perjury. That seems fair. Surely, given the screeches for an FBI investigation to see if Kavanaugh was lying, the same should be applied to Dr Ford?


So if it was found that she wasn't lying, that would imply that Kavanaugh is guilty, correct? So wouldn't it be the same investigation either way? An investigation by the way which we just had, and gave a result of inconclusive in any direction.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

The thing is a thorough investigation into whether or not Ford committed perjury would also be a thorough investigation into whether she was assaulted by Kavanaugh. I thought you guys were trying to avoid that.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 04:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan




So what it comes down to is this: Are you comfortable with a Supreme Court justice who may be a serial rapist, or would you prefer one with an identical ideology who we can conclusively say is not a serial rapist?



That statement is just so stupid...sorry, but it is. Judge Kav has been thoroughly vetted seven times. He has a record and a reputation spanning twelve years on the DC Court of Appeals and sixteen years in clerkships, counsel, and WH positions.

ZERO accusations from ANY woman during his entire history of service and employment. ZERO. Hundreds of women have come forward that worked with him, went to school with him, and had associations with him. ZERO.

I am more than comfortable with Justice Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. I am thrilled that a man of his caliber is there. Only an ignoramus would entertain the idea that he was a serial rapist or a sleazy porn lawyer that gets off by digging up psychos to manufacture idiotic stories.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Ok, so lets try this from a different approach. What makes Kavanaugh special? There's an entire list of ideologically similar if not outright identical judges. McConnell didn't like Kavanaugh due to his baggage, all of the recommendations were against Kavanaugh, who was a last minute addition to the list by Trump.

You say you're happy with someone of his caliber, so what is it that makes him stand out from the others that were on the shortlist? Why him?



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 05:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

Making things up is not going to make them true.

Kavanaugh was surely ready to be confirmed before Ford's accusations. He is highly qualified.


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Sunday that he believes the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh is his proudest accomplishment in the upper chamber.


link

Of course there are others who are also qualified. The point is, giving in to a political hit job is not a good precedent to set.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

If Kavanaugh was guilty he would had charges filed DECADES AGO in a real court of law.

Instead of assassinated in the kangaroo court of public opinion where FACTS and actual evidence need not apply.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 05:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

Yes, because everyone knows exactly what they are going to be at the age of 17

And like you said, where would I find the corroboration for a claim made against you?

7 FBI background checks and no corroboration against BK.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 06:45 PM
link   
If the FBI wasn't able to find anything wrong with Hillary, what makes you think they can find anything wrong with Ford?



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 06:50 PM
link   
a reply to: toms54

More than a few swamp members are no longer with the FBI. We can have hope that they have changed.

I think they already have evidence of crimes. What other reason is there for Feinstein to request that the report be sealed from the public?

I hope that they continue to pursue the investigation and that there are prosecutions.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Of course there are others who are also qualified. The point is, giving in to a political hit job is not a good precedent to set.


Neither is naming an ideologue to the bench.

So I'll repeat my question (which I know the answer to, I'm curious if you do). What makes Kavanaugh unique? Why did he need to be the one seated despite several major internal concerns about the guy?

I'll give you a hint. Out of everyone on the short list, he holds a unique stance on a specific Presidential power.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Aazadan

If Kavanaugh was guilty he would had charges filed DECADES AGO in a real court of law.

Instead of assassinated in the kangaroo court of public opinion where FACTS and actual evidence need not apply.


No he wouldn't, the US has a culture of turning a blind eye to rape, especially back in the early 80's. Just a matter of months before this alleged rape happened, a movie released (Revenge of the Nerds) that has a glorified and still fondly remembered rape scene that is the protagonists great triumph over the antagonist by raping her after a whole movies worth of escalating sexual assaults... and people love it. You think women can come forward in that environment?

It is estimated that 90% of rapes go unreported, of those that are reported, 90% aren't prosecuted. Of those that are prosecuted, only 33% end in convictions. Out of the serious crimes out there, raping someone is one of the easiest to get away with.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jusvistn
Yes, because everyone knows exactly what they are going to be at the age of 17


Not everyone does, but if you want to be in a position of power, you should have that type of foresight as you're going to be making decisions that have lasting impacts for 30, 50, or 100 years into the future.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 07:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

The "internal concerns" were manufactured political attacks. If they would have pulled him based on false accusations, then this would have legitimized it, and these types of attacks would continue.

The information you hint at in your last statement is a lie pushed by the liberals. The Supreme Court does not make laws, so the Supreme Court has no power to change laws about Executive privileges.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
The information you hint at in your last statement is a lie pushed by the liberals. The Supreme Court does not make laws, so the Supreme Court has no power to change laws about Executive privileges.


If there is only one interpretation of a law, then there wouldn't be such large ideological differences between justices.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

There are liberal judges who try to change the law. Soros's Open Society Foundation has the goal of using the courts as a weapon to push socialism. THIS is why he invested so much in stopping Kavanaugh.

Any of the judges on Trump's list would have been through the same torment. I suspect Dems are already armed with manufactured accusations against every one of them.

The only reason that Gorsuch was not attacked was because he was filling a spot that was previously occupied by a Constitutionalist. Soros and Dems do not want the Supreme Court interpreting the Constitution as it is, they want judges who will rewrite the Constitution by changing the meaning.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 07:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aazadan



I'm more interested in Swetnicks claim personally. She's a far more credible person, and was completely ignored.


Swetnick Backtracks...

Maybe you missed it, but she basically clarified and recanted that there was no evidence that he was one of the people who supposedly gang-banged her, other than being at a party with his friends as well as many dozens of others, not even the party she got "gang-raped" at. She recanted that he spiked punch, and essentially her claims boil down to -- he was in a group of boys at a huge party and they were "laughing a lot".
edit on 7-10-2018 by Halfswede because: better link

edit on 7-10-2018 by Halfswede because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
29
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join