Twitter #Shadowban Anyone else have this happen?

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe

I only see winofiend's tweet above the line (before the no replies). The other two posters below the line.

And none of yours.

That's how I'm seeing it as well.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

since 2010.

I think that ignore thing is gone but who knows.

🎃

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Parishna

We are being cross-pollinated 😤

Lol, I don't know why that cracked me up 😂

a reply to: loam

I think there's some kind of "delay".

Maybe a trip-sensor server overload.

🔑🔓

a reply to: Tanga36

So clearly each one of us have a set of metadata associated with our accounts that places us into certain buckets. Who you see, and how you see them, seems based upon which bucket any one of us falls in.

But Vasa definitely seems shadowbanned.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Parishna

We are being cross-pollinated 😤

Belly laugh...nice.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Tanga36

So clearly each one of us have a set of metadata associated with our accounts that places us into certain buckets. Who you see, and how you see them, seems based upon which bucket any one of us falls in.

But Vasa definitely seems shadowbanned.

Whoa....you went all deep on us....

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Tanga36

So clearly each one of us have a set of metadata associated with our accounts that places us into certain buckets. Who you see, and how you see them, seems based upon which bucket any one of us falls in.

But Vasa definitely seems shadowbanned.

That is the conclusion I came to awhile back. Twitter changed a few things, after an update, and I noticed that I could see certain replies but not all of them.

At first I assumed it had to do with privacy settings of the people replying but I started noticing it more and more on accounts that I never used to.

Now I've noticed that a lot of times I will want to check replies and I can't access them unless I reply first. I was lucky this time and could see the replies without having to actually reply.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Would love to know what criteria places you into what bucket.

Since this isn't really about advertising, or maybe it is, you have to wonder what interest they have in mind for segregating the experience of their users in this way.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Would love to know what criteria places you in what bucket.

Since this isn't really about advertising, or maybe it is, you have to wonder what interest they have in mind for segregating the experience of their users in this way.

I am in the South East...Atlanta. what area are you in?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Heart of the swamp.

ETA: but highly doubt it's all geographically based.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

I'm in the middle of corn country

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Heart of the swamp.

ETA: but highly doubt it's all geographically based.

It just hit me that if we could figure out their alogs by doing this, we'd definitely be smarter than the people writing them because they usually don't even know how they work until after it's implemented. Haha

It's got to be based on who we follow, what we click on, what we like, what we retweet, etc.

They are then categorizing those into buckets...and then treating those buckets to different experiences.

When you really think about it, the power of that is terrifying.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Why not just tell 'em to, in the words of several Brits of my acquaintance, bugger off?

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Would love to know what criteria places you in what bucket.

Since this isn't really about advertising, or maybe it is, you have to wonder what interest they have in mind for segregating the experience of their users in this way.

I am in the South East...Atlanta. what area are you in?

Chicago area.

SwampClog2

😯

originally posted by: BlueJacket
Im going to say this once...all the people giving a crap about any social media need to get the heck outa the house, off a chair and LIVE. ATS has been my guilty pleasure, but heck once I start working full time again in oncology related products, I dont foresee giving a square @×+= about what any nameless dbag thinks.

so over every pc dbag on earth, in fact...I may just be done

What you say in the context of your post is accurate. The way you say it, would leave most social media addicts thumbing their nose at you.

originally posted by: loam
It's got to be based on who we follow, what we click on, what we like, what we retweet, etc.

They are then categorizing those into buckets...and then treating those buckets to different experiences.

When you really think about it, the power of that is terrifying.

Most everything you purchase with a bank card in big name stores is RFID tagged and that info is all stored....

PCI compliance is all about what info companies can store on their servers.

I'll also add that I have never tweeted, retweeted, or liked anything. So they don't have those on me.

(I reserve all of my wisdom for ATS. lol)

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Would love to know what criteria places you in what bucket.

Since this isn't really about advertising, or maybe it is, you have to wonder what interest they have in mind for segregating the experience of their users in this way.

I am in the South East...Atlanta. what area are you in?

Chicago area.

SwampClog2

😯

Off topic but I gotta say it anyways, the Cubs got royally screwed!
Ok... Back to our regularly scheduled programming