It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Feinstein: ‘I Had To Leave’ – Did Not Read Entire Report

page: 3
49
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Rewey


Kavanaugh refused to answer Democrat's key questions during the hearing. He wouldn't be able to refuse to answer those questions if posed by the FBI.

Ford specifically asked the FBI to find out when Mark Judge worked at the grocery store, so she could better say when the gathering in question took place. And, Kavanaugh's own calendar shows that there was a "brewski" gathering on July 1st that included 3 of the 4 people Ford named to be at the party. The FBI should have questioned Kavanaugh about that entry.




posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

His drinking has nothing to do with sexual assault. More moving goal posts. What new allegations? Ramirez was interviewed, stop lying.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The Democrats had an entire hearing where they could have asked her anything they wanted instead they all stood up and said I believe you. Maybe they should have been asking some questions during the investigation.

And if I recall correctly Grassley is asking for the note she handed over to the Washington Post was she will not even hand over to them so whatever

As for Kavanaugh, I think he was grilled. Sadly the Democrats didn't like the outcome boohoo
edit on 10/5/2018 by Martin75 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Yawn.

The FBI made the decision from there as to who to interview," Sen. Mike Lee explained.


Next.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The FBI talked to judge and others Ford named including her friend.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Rewey

It is incomplete when it was set up that way by the people who ordered it.


They were tasked with investigating credible allegations against Kavanaugh in a supplemental FBI background investigation added to 6 previous complete FBI background investigations that all found nothing. There is nothing more they could have done, but the left will still complain. Nothing will ever satisfy them short of Kavanaugh being withdrawn from nomination. You can't keep them all jumping through hoops forever in this case, it has to end sometime. The democrats would like to keep it going for months longer not in a search for truth, but to delay the process. The truth is everything lead nowhere. Nothing to substantiate or corroborate the credible allegations.






posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: ausername

But but when he was 5 he pooped his pants. Disqualified, we can't have a SCJ who pooped themselves.

I demand a full poop pants FBI investigation.
edit on 5-10-2018 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Pyle

Yawn.

The FBI made the decision from there as to who to interview," Sen. Mike Lee explained.


Next.


Yes they could interview anyone within the scope put forth by the white house, which was limited to say the least.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Rewey

It is incomplete when it was set up that way by the people who ordered it.


They were tasked with investigating credible allegations against Kavanaugh in a supplemental FBI background investigation added to 6 previous complete FBI background investigations that all found nothing. There is nothing more they could have done, but the left will still complain. Nothing will ever satisfy them short of Kavanaugh being withdrawn from nomination. You can't keep them all jumping through hoops forever in this case, it has to end sometime. The democrats would like to keep it going for months longer not in a search for truth, but to delay the process. The truth is everything lead nowhere. Nothing to substantiate or corroborate the credible allegations.





His nomination should have been pulled the second he started lying about his white house time under Bush. Dude is neck deep in the bush era torture and domestic spying.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Limited to credible accusations. So accuser 1 and 2. Are you suggesting they should be investigating accusations that no one has made?

Your source said the only limit was don't interview Ford or Kavanaugh as they just were questioned.
edit on 5-10-2018 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:55 AM
link   

edit on 5-10-2018 by Wide-Eyes because: I have no horse in this race.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04



Here’s a list of the people who we know have not been interviewed:

A suitemate of Kavanaugh’s has now told the New Yorker he remembers hearing at the time about the incident Deborah Ramirez has recounted. Ramirez, who has been interviewed, had claimed that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her during a dorm party at Yale.

The suitemate, Kenneth G. Appold, now says he is “one-hundred-per-cent certain” that he was told the culprit was Kavanaugh. He does say he never discussed this with Ramirez, but he claims an eyewitness described the episode to him at the time. Appold has tried to share this story with the FBI, but there’s no indication the FBI is willing to hear from him.

A classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Georgetown Prep now strongly challenges one of Kavanaugh’s assertions under oath. The person told the New Yorker that he heard Kavanaugh talk repeatedly about Renate Dolphin as someone “that everyone passed around for sex” (the witness’ words), and even heard Kavanaugh singing a rhyme that included the words “you wanna get laid, you can make it with REE-NATE.” Kavanaugh (and many others) described themselves in their yearbook as a “Renate Alumnius,” but Kavanaugh has denied under oath that this was a sexual reference, claiming, ludicrously, that it was intended to show “affection.”

This classmate is not named by the New Yorker. But he put his name on a statement to the FBI and Judiciary Committee that makes this claim, and he is prepared to talk to the FBI. There is no indication this happened.

James Roche, one of Kavanaugh’s roommates at Yale, has written a piece for Slate that claims Kavanaugh lied under oath about his use of slang and his drinking. Roche claims that Kavanaugh “regularly” blacked out. Roche has offered to talk to the FBI, but there’s no indication this happened.

Roche also pointedly added of Kavanaugh: “He said that ‘boofing’ was farting and the ‘Devil’s Triangle’ was a drinking game. ‘Boofing’ and ‘Devil’s Triangle’ are sexual references. I know this because I heard Brett and his friends using these terms on multiple occasions.” Roche concluded that Kavanaugh “has demonstrated a willingness to be untruthful under oath about easily verified information.”

NBC News reports that the FBI has not contacted dozens of people who could potentially corroborate the allegations against Kavanaugh or testify to his behavior at the time. This includes many people who knew either Ford or Ramirez at the time, and people who actually approached the FBI offering information.

The Post reports that Ramirez’s lawyers provided the FBI with a list of more than 20 people who might have relevant information, but “as of Wednesday, Ramirez’s team had no indication that the bureau had interviewed any of them.”

Blasey Ford’s legal team today put out a list of additional people who have not been contacted by the FBI, some of whom were prepared to corroborate that she had in the past discussed being the victim of a sexual assault by a federal judge.

Neither Ford nor Kavanaugh have been interviewed by the FBI. As the Brookings Institution’s Susan Hennessey points out: “It is inconceivable they could close a real investigation without re-interviewing Kavanaugh.”

www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.7c401082f71b
edit on 5-10-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Thanks, getting through to these partisan Trump supporters is rough. They honestly shut out anything that even hints to bad things towards Trump.

Trying to explain how Kavanaugh was terrible pick even before the sexual assault stuff come up with his role Bush Torture and domestic spying, only to be met with people going on and on about its okay because something something Trump only makes the best picks.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

So he wasn't sure before but now is ... Despite not being there and all the actual eyewitnesses saying it wasn't Kavanaugh.

Question, who is the witness, someone there with first-hand experience or someone not there who wasn't sure until just now who did it?

You're a joke.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Rewey

It is incomplete when it was set up that way by the people who ordered it.


They were only investigating 'credible accusations', which removed a lot of the fluff from this circus.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Rewey

And they could investigate anyone they wanted. The only people off the table was Ford and Kavanaugh.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha
You've convinced me. He had sex with the local bike. The rest of your quote sounds like conjecture to me.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Martin75




The Democrats had an entire hearing where they could have asked her anything they wanted instead they all stood up and said I believe you. Maybe they should have been asking some questions during the investigation.


Even more reason to have the FBI interview her.

But, that's not the way I remember it, although they certainly did thank her for coming and commend her for her bravery. On the other hand, the Republicans hid behind a female prosecutor, meant to ever so politely prosecute the victim, and wouldn't allow her to question Kavanaugh. They took away her voice as soon as the July 1st gathering came up.

The FBI should have re-interviewed Kavanaugh too.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha


Appold said he recently reached out to the person who allegedly told him about the Ramirez incident, but never heard back. That unnamed person, however, reportedly told the New Yorker he did not remember the incident.


So he's not a witness to anything.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Rewey


Kavanaugh refused to answer Democrat's key questions during the hearing. He wouldn't be able to refuse to answer those questions if posed by the FBI.


Nonsense. What is self-incrimination? What is pleading the fifth? What is 'I don't recall (x39)'?

As is the case with the constant crying about Trump not talking to Mueller: if there is an actual case there with actual evidence, you shouldn't need to talk to him in order to uncover wrongdoing, because obviously your entire case is built on hearsay alone.


Ford specifically asked the FBI to find out when Mark Judge worked at the grocery store, so she could better say when the gathering in question took place. And, Kavanaugh's own calendar shows that there was a "brewski" gathering on July 1st that included 3 of the 4 people Ford named to be at the party. The FBI should have questioned Kavanaugh about that entry.



Once again, maybe Ford could sort her own allegations out first? Maybe her impressive legal team could do some leg work? You can't cry foul about allegations of attempted rape, and then hope that everyone else can put all the dates and pieces together for you. What an absolutely embarrassing shambles.




top topics



 
49
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join