It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Feinstein: ‘I Had To Leave’ – Did Not Read Entire Report

page: 12
49
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 08:12 AM
link   
What if "I had to leave" doesn't mean what she wants us to think it does?

What if it means she had to leave because they wouldn't allow her to read some of it because it pertains to HER?

IIRC Grassley requested all of the documents pertainging to Ford's and her lawyer's contact with Feinstein's office and Hiro's office. I'm sure the FBI asked for the same.

Perhaps that video of her in near tears after coming out of that reading, was actually telling us something......
edit on 7-10-2018 by poncho1982 because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 08:37 AM
link   
Guess Feinstein is going all in with Ford case and lost due she's in the sealed indictment?
(Don't know if she knew that or she simply assumed she's in that due to her shady past?)

So is she doing everything to avoid that? (purely speculative of course)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 08:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

I think the documents are too long on purpose so that even if you do read it you never leave with actual knowledge about what is being said.



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 09:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Carcharadon
You've forgotten if there is a scandal that breaks open she could be thrown off the court. Just wait, somethings brewing for 3 of them. Watch Wikileaks and Q posts.

Trump will have elected at least 3 SCOTUS before his term is out.
edit on 7-10-2018 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   
Dems lose their bowel function! Leftists harassing an elderly Trump supporter. More footage for Trump 2020 ads.

twitter.com...


edit on 7-10-2018 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 01:55 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

originally posted by:OccamsRazor04
His drinking has nothing to do with sexual assault.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Wrong


Ok -- So let's say that the FBI investigation shows no evidence that Kavanaugh was there at the time Dr. Ford alleges he sexually assaulted her...

...But that same FBI investigation uncovers that he likes to drink beer.

What do you propose the Senate do with that information?


edit on 2018/10/7 by Box of Rain because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Box of Rain

Dems will insinuate any beer drinkers are rapists!



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Rewey


Kavanaugh refused to answer Democrat's key questions during the hearing. He wouldn't be able to refuse to answer those questions if posed by the FBI.



I'm not necessarily Kavanaugh supporter, but this is not true.

If congress feels a person is not answering questions posed by congress truthfully or to the best of his/her ability and recollection, then they could charge that person with contempt of congress.

It's not true that a person is MORE compelled to answer FBI questions than questions from congress. A person in a congressional hearing is at least equally as compelled to do so -- or plead the Fifth amendment, which they could do wen speaking to the FBI as well. Although Kavanaugh pleading the fifth in the senate hearing would have been extremely problematic for his nomination hopes.


edit on 7/10/2018 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2018 @ 04:58 PM
link   



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join