It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Feinstein: ‘I Had To Leave’ – Did Not Read Entire Report

page: 10
49
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: darkbake
it would not be possible for her to read it, anyway.


Dianne Feinstein is illiterate?




posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

She couldn't read the 1,000-page document in less than 24 hours, and she also had to be courteous to the other 99 members of the Senate who needed to look at it.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: darkbake

I'm curious if maybe this is why Bret kept answering with "they just give you conclusions".

The FBI provided a 1,000 page report on him. Presumably the same 1,000 page report they delivered the other 6? times.

He knew that "Yeah if you want that you can have it but you're going to have to sift through it."

I dunno... spitballing... silly BS really. They lost, again. People are screaming.

Dogs and cats, living together... MASS HYSTERIA!

Having a hard time caring at this point.



I'm curious though, was it really just one copy they provided? That IS sort of a d!ck move hahahaa.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 08:33 PM
link   
The Wicked Witch of the Left.




posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 08:33 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 08:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon

She looks scared.
She is in trouble. They found out what she did.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 10:37 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

I think we need to ponder deeper why the FBI did not interview Ford and Kavanaugh. It is not enough to say they didn't need to because they already testified at the hearing.

Also, Trump had little to lose in allowing that and would have helped aesthetics of a thorough FBI investigation for doubters.

I feel there is more to it that we are missing.

What possible advantage could it be to not interview them?



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 12:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Strate8
a reply to: BlueAjah

I think we need to ponder deeper why the FBI did not interview Ford and Kavanaugh. It is not enough to say they didn't need to because they already testified at the hearing.

Also, Trump had little to lose in allowing that and would have helped aesthetics of a thorough FBI investigation for doubters.

I feel there is more to it that we are missing.

What possible advantage could it be to not interview them?

My god man it’s all been gone over and Ford is lucky more pertinent questions were asked of her. This was already enough of a circus and it didn’t have to be that way so why waste even more time going over the same ish for the umpteenth time?



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 12:54 AM
link   
a reply to: BigDave-AR

Yes, lucky more pertinent questions weren't asked of her. Exactly. Why pass up an opportunity for that?

I don't see any downside to it but there must be somehow because it was poor optics not to question her or Kavanaugh.

This is a group that is inquisitive, looks into layers of things, is curious when things are out of place. And not questioning them strikes me a a little out of place.

Maybe it was their intent to go soft on her because she is just a pawn but I don't think so because even as a pawn she was a critical piece in a set of moves that seem to have backfired on the Left in a big way.

They said who they interviewed but also a set of interviews does not make up the full materials of an investigation either. Then there is the matter of Feinstein's face which could not hide her obvious distress.

So maybe someone with legal background could think of some possible reason why it would be better for FBI not to interview her directly at this time...



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 01:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Strate8
a reply to: BigDave-AR

Yes, lucky more pertinent questions weren't asked of her. Exactly. Why pass up an opportunity for that?

I don't see any downside to it but there must be somehow because it was poor optics not to question her or Kavanaugh.

This is a group that is inquisitive, looks into layers of things, is curious when things are out of place. And not questioning them strikes me a a little out of place.

Maybe it was their intent to go soft on her because she is just a pawn but I don't think so because even as a pawn she was a critical piece in a set of moves that seem to have backfired on the Left in a big way.

They said who they interviewed but also a set of interviews does not make up the full materials of an investigation either. Then there is the matter of Feinstein's face which could not hide her obvious distress.

So maybe someone with legal background could think of some possible reason why it would be better for FBI not to interview her directly at this time...

Perhaps it’s as simple as damage control deal the dems back off being so rabid and they don’t pursue Ford and possibly cause the whole charade to become even more of a nightmare for the dems if it’s revealed that she was indeed a political pawn that didn’t pass the muster. Things could have been far worse for the dems to the point of bringing the party to their knees harder. They made a big gamble and crapped out big time.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 01:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle




Oh, sorry that was Trump, while at the same time saying the FBI can look at anything they want to the public. My mistake.


Apparently you didn't get the memo. There were already 6 investigations by the FBI into Kavanaugh. I know the Dems are butthurt nothing was found, but we can't subvert the nomination process to go on forever for butthurt Dems, LOL!



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:02 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Feinstein got her ass handed to her...she was outmaneuvered and decided to pout about it. The best time ever since Trump got elected!



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Pyle




Oh, sorry that was Trump, while at the same time saying the FBI can look at anything they want to the public. My mistake.


Apparently you didn't get the memo. There were already 6 investigations by the FBI into Kavanaugh. I know the Dems are butthurt nothing was found, but we can't subvert the nomination process to go on forever for butthurt Dems, LOL!


Six isn't enough, surely if they just had one more then it would be proven beyond a shadow of doubt that Judge Kavanaugh did indeed throw an icecube at someone during a party. Which of course would immediately disqualify him from being allowed to live in the United States ever again.

I do agree with your statement that this weekend is the best one since the libs were humiliated.

But wait, there's more. Next month there's gonna be mass liberal suicides as the very very small democrat support base learns that the VAAAAAAST majority of the country is absolutely NOT on their 'side'.

Then comes the Nobel. You know its coming at some stage. Maybe next year. I know it's coming. They know it's coming. All of a sudden the Nobel committe is going to be a 'racist fascist white-supremist nazi' organisation overnight. I can't wait.

And then, we have 2020. And I for one can not WAIT! to see them reveal their candidate, THAT is gonna be funny!



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Candidate for 2020!? They can't even fashion a platform to run on unless George Soros tells them what to think!



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 07:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Yet, newly discovered information in the HRC server probe uncovered thousands and thousands of new emails and information ..... yet no one wanted to question how THAT investigation of information could be fully covered and investigated in 1 WEEK.....

what's good for the goose is good for the gander ?

Apparently not if it goes against what YOU believe and the outcome you hoped for.

but the entire debacle brought on by the dems over the BK confirmation isn't partisan BS, not in any way.... nope.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 07:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: Pyle

Yet, newly discovered information in the HRC server probe uncovered thousands and thousands of new emails and information ..... yet no one wanted to question how THAT investigation of information could be fully covered and investigated in 1 WEEK.....

what's good for the goose is good for the gander ?

Apparently not if it goes against what YOU believe and the outcome you hoped for.

but the entire debacle brought on by the dems over the BK confirmation isn't partisan BS, not in any way.... nope.


Pretty simply, the FBI could use computers to compare the emails for duplicates. Any dupes could be thrown out. Then the small number of remaining emails, a few thousand, could be reviewed manually by a couple of agents over a week.

100 senators needing to review 1 copy of a 1000 page document 1 at a time over 24 hours isnt nearly the same.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 07:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: Pyle

Yet, newly discovered information in the HRC server probe uncovered thousands and thousands of new emails and information ..... yet no one wanted to question how THAT investigation of information could be fully covered and investigated in 1 WEEK.....

what's good for the goose is good for the gander ?

Apparently not if it goes against what YOU believe and the outcome you hoped for.

but the entire debacle brought on by the dems over the BK confirmation isn't partisan BS, not in any way.... nope.


Pretty simply, the FBI could use computers to compare the emails for duplicates. Any dupes could be thrown out. Then the small number of remaining emails, a few thousand, could be reviewed manually by a couple of agents over a week.

100 senators needing to review 1 copy of a 1000 page document 1 at a time over 24 hours isnt nearly the same.

How is that any different from the 6 prior FBI investigations into him?!?!? 99% of the report is just going to be rehashing of things already covered in the prior reports!



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 07:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Pretty simple, they did no investigation.

In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

“Most of the emails were never examined, even though they made up potentially 10 times the evidence” of what was reviewed in the original year-long case that Comey closed in July 2016, said a law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation.


www.dailywire.com...

Remember, this was the world where Clinton was going to win and they had to go easy on her because she would attack them otherwise.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 07:45 AM
link   
a reply to: BigDave-AR

Pyle is being disingenuous, they did not investigate those emails.


In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

Sperry points out that even that "extremely narrow" review of just a small fraction of the emails found that classified information was being either sent or received via Clinton's unauthorized, unsecured private server.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 08:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: BigDave-AR

Pyle is being disingenuous, they did not investigate those emails.


In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

Sperry points out that even that "extremely narrow" review of just a small fraction of the emails found that classified information was being either sent or received via Clinton's unauthorized, unsecured private server.

I figured that he’s grasping at straws I just thought it was funny him torpedoing his own argument.

edit on 10/6/2018 by BigDave-AR because: (no reason given)

edit on 10/6/2018 by BigDave-AR because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join