It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: blackcrowe
No. Don't explain how things are created through other created things. How are these things, like oxygen, created?
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: stormcell
Gravity doesn't allow that. Either gravity was created after the big bang. Or it doesn't exist at all.
Planck Epoch (or Planck Era), from zero to approximately 10^-43 seconds (1 Planck Time):
This is the closest that current physics can get to the absolute beginning of time, and very little can be known about this period. General relativity proposes a gravitational singularity before this time (although even that may break down due to quantum effects), and it is hypothesized that the four fundamental forces (electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force and gravity) all have the same strength, and are possibly even unified into one fundamental force, held together by a perfect symmetry which some have likened to a sharpened pencil standing on its point (i.e. too symmetrical to last). At this point, the universe spans a region of only 10^-35 meters (1 Planck Length), and has a temperature of over 1032°C (the Planck Temperature).
Grand Unification Epoch, from 10–43 seconds to 10^–36 seconds:
The force of gravity separates from the other fundamental forces (which remain unified), and the earliest elementary particles (and antiparticles) begin to be created.
And gasses don't pull together to make solids. They just don't. Stop believing what you are taught and actually think about it.
6 down vote favorite 2 How much mass is released from a supernova of a 15 solar-mass star? 20? 25? What is the relation between star mass and mass ejected? mass astrophysics stars supernova stellar-evolution shareciteimprove this question edited Mar 22 '15 at 10:45 Qmechanic♦ 97.8k121641052 asked Mar 22 '15 at 2:50 Still Thinking 505 add a comment 1 Answer active oldest votes up vote 7 down vote accepted I like to explain this using a figure from a talk by Marco Limongi some years ago. Initial versus final mass for stars more massive than about 10 solar masses. Based on a given set of models, the x-axis shows the initial mass of the models and the y-axis the final mass. The different coloured layers show the composition of the star at the moment of collapse. The mass ejected in the supernova is the difference between the curve marked remnant mass, which specifies (for these models) how much matter became part of the remnant, and the final mass, which was the mass of the star at collapse, after it had already lost a lot during its life. The interesting point in this prediction is the change between the supernovae that leave neutron stars versus those that leave black holes. At the boundary, there's a large drop in the supernova-ejecta mass, because the black hole doesn't have a surface off of which inward falling material can bounce. But, though the broad trends are probably right, note that this is the result for a particular set of model assumptions (e.g. mass loss on the main sequence, supernova energy and dynamics). The amount of ejecta for the supernova of a given progenitor is an open question, and still subject to intense research.
Size and mass of very large stars, from right to left: VY Canis Majoris (17 ± 8 M☉), Betelgeuse (11.6 ± 5.0 M☉), Rho Cassiopeiae (14-30 M☉), and the blue Pistol Star (27.5 M☉). The concentric ovals indicate the size of Neptune's (blue), Jupiter's (red) and the Earth's (grey) orbits. Properly scaled, the Sun (1 M☉) only appears as a tiny dot in the center of the ovals (click for higher resolution to see Earth orbit and Sun). The solar mass (M☉) is a standard unit of mass in astronomy, equal to approximately 2×1030 kg. It is used to indicate the masses of other stars, as well as clusters, nebulae, and galaxies. It is equal to the mass of the Sun (denoted by the solar symbol ⊙︎). This equates to about two nonillion (two quintillion in the long scale) kilograms: M☉ = (1.98847±0.00007)×1030 kg[1][2] The above mass is about 332946 times the mass of Earth (M⊕), or 1048 times the mass of Jupiter (MJ). Because Earth follows an elliptical orbit around the Sun, the solar mass can be computed from the equation for the orbital period of a small body orbiting a central mass.[3] Based upon the length of the year, the distance from Earth to the Sun (an astronomical unit or AU), and the gravitational constant (G), the mass of the Sun is given by: [displaystyle M_[odot ]=[frac [4pi ^[2]times (1,mathrm [AU] )^[3]][Gtimes (1,mathrm [yr] )^[2]]]] M_[odot ]=[frac [4pi ^[2]times (1,[mathrm [AU]])^[3]][Gtimes (1,[mathrm [yr]])^[2]]] The value of G is difficult to measure and is only known with limited accuracy in SI units (see Cavendish experiment). The value of G times the mass of an object, called the standard gravitational parameter, is known for the Sun and several planets to much higher accuracy than G alone. As a result, the solar mass is used as the standard mass in the astronomical system of units.
The terms "mass" and "weight" are used interchangeably in ordinary conversation, but the two words don't mean the same thing. The difference between mass and weight is that mass is the amount of matter in a material while weight is a measure of how the force of gravity acts upon that mass.
www.thoughtco.com...
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: Toolman18
And gasses don't pull together to make solids. They just don't.
Stop believing what you are taught and actually think about it.
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: TerraLiga
And our universe is expanding, right? What's it expanding in to?
originally posted by: Vortiki
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: TerraLiga
And our universe is expanding, right? What's it expanding in to?
The universe above us. Our universe is, by textbook deffinition, a black hole. Ine could claim the "big bang" was nothing more than the creation of a blackhole in our "parent" universe, when a star supernova'd, collapsed into a blackhole, and began eating up everything it could. Its the only way I can see getting matter to just "appear" from seemingly nothing.
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: Toolman18
Anybody with a real answer? Phage? Anyone who can explain the real beginning of stuff?