It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White House Finds No Corroboration of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Kavanaugh in FBI Report

page: 4
60
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 10:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Wayfarer


It's not a criminal investigation, and the named witnesses were interviewed. As to Dr. Ford, her testimony and written statement are already on record. Any decent lawyer would advise her, to not continue any further interviews in fear of a changed, or mismatched (to previous recorded testimony) testimony.

But hey, if you think giving her more rope would be a good idea ; Well I differ in my opinion.




None of the Democrats wanted a criminal investigation. If they did, they would've advised these women to file charges. They played their supporters like a harp from hell. Many of them are now aware they got played, they just can't admit it because they still don't want Kavanaugh confirmed, whether he's guilty or not. This was merely a means to an end, it was never about justice or protecting women. If anything, this has further damaged women. But hey, it was worth it right? Because, politics.




posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Preaching to the Choir, friend.





posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Wayfarer


It's not a criminal investigation, and the named witnesses were interviewed. As to Dr. Ford, her testimony and written statement are already on record. Any decent lawyer would advise her, to not continue any further interviews in fear of a changed, or mismatched (to previous recorded testimony) testimony.

But hey, if you think giving her more rope would be a good idea ; Well I differ in my opinion.




If anything, this has further damaged women. But hey, it was worth it right? Because, politics.


Polls are suggesting that this whole debacle has not improved Republican standing with women voters. Of course time will tell whether Kavanughs appointment fires up conservative voters or lulls them into complacency...



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Wayfarer


It's not a criminal investigation, and the named witnesses were interviewed. As to Dr. Ford, her testimony and written statement are already on record. Any decent lawyer would advise her, to not continue any further interviews in fear of a changed, or mismatched (to previous recorded testimony) testimony.

But hey, if you think giving her more rope would be a good idea ; Well I differ in my opinion.




If anything, this has further damaged women. But hey, it was worth it right? Because, politics.


Polls are suggesting that this whole debacle has not improved Republican standing with women voters. Of course time will tell whether Kavanughs appointment fires up conservative voters or lulls them into complacency...


Senator Feinstein just said she didn't have time to read the entire report.

But she apparently had time to assemble a news conference.

Hmmm.

😀



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
This CNN guy sounds pretty depressed that Senators COLLINS and FLAKE are now "onboard" to support Kavanaugh.
twitter.com...


Breaking: Funeral Director Schumer says he is a "NO". The FBI Background Check wasn't thorough enough.

No surprise there, even though he announced it like the world would now crumble, lol.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer



Oh indeed I did (it just didn't have any immediate bearing to the FBI investigation discussion here in this thread).

Oh, because she said in her experiance Fords story was not credible (there is that word again)?



I'm not sure what your Ramirez quotes insinuates, since the above quote talks about interviewing any other witnesses, which when you later link the second quote just reaffirms they only interviewed Ramirez.

And after interviewing Ramirez perhaps they determined her story was not credible as well?
Perhaps because she had to call people and ask them if what she would later accuse actually happened?

Why would they interview others when the accusers are found not to be credible?



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Wayfarer


It's not a criminal investigation, and the named witnesses were interviewed. As to Dr. Ford, her testimony and written statement are already on record. Any decent lawyer would advise her, to not continue any further interviews in fear of a changed, or mismatched (to previous recorded testimony) testimony.

But hey, if you think giving her more rope would be a good idea ; Well I differ in my opinion.




If anything, this has further damaged women. But hey, it was worth it right? Because, politics.


Polls are suggesting that this whole debacle has not improved Republican standing with women voters. Of course time will tell whether Kavanughs appointment fires up conservative voters or lulls them into complacency...



What polls? I can tell you most of the conservative women I know think she was not credible, and if anything, are now more likely to vote R than ever before. The Democrats involved in this took it too damn far, and I think it will backfire mightily in their direction. This debacle is one of the most shameful things I've ever seen.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Seeing Feinstein and Schumer at the microphone together was a sorry sight. Democrats need to replace both of them with someone who's alive and honest.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: carewemust
This CNN guy sounds pretty depressed that Senators COLLINS and FLAKE are now "onboard" to support Kavanaugh.
twitter.com...


Breaking: Funeral Director Schumer says he is a "NO". The FBI Background Check wasn't thorough enough.

No surprise there, even though he announced it like the world would now crumble, lol.


Senator Schumer also mentioned and emphasized "Dr Ford had the courage to come forward" several times.

Makes me think the entire "Dr Ford" thing was a hoax.

We also now know the xFBI person (outed a day or 2 ago) was closer to "Dr Ford" than they want anybody to know about.

😎🤦‍♀️



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: artnut Polls are for Dems, liberals and strippers. Oops... was that sexist, I apologize.
Polls are seriously not given to conservative areas, groups or even centrous types. As in the Presidential polls... remember? This battle may be won, but the war is still being waged. What kind of person does it take to make sure their agenda is achieved ... regardless of the damage and toll to lives and families. This, if nothing else has once again exposed the liberal agenda... which is destroy, plunder, erase, negate, 'anything' that is in the way or does not agree. Sounds like 1936 Germany.

Heil Democrats/Socialists! You Shall Not Pass! lol



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Me Too! ------Nope! Not this time.



Kavanaugh did not sexually assault anyone, these claims were false and the media collaborated with the DNC to orchestrate this fake outrage.

It's becoming more and more obvious as each hour goes by. Those that steadfastly refuse to see the truth are obviously in it for their own reason!


Great post The truth will always out. Thank god Kavanaugh didn't back down (like some of those castrados in Congress did. ie: Jeff Flake)

On that same note, any person who votes against Kavanaugh (or speaks against him) should be primaried. We don't need low-information morons in congress who can't tell the difference between the truth and politicized fake allegations. We don't need people in congress who are castrado BETA soy boys that won't stand up for what they believe in. And especially not some a-testicoli beta who backs down simply because some unrelated sexual assault alleged victim (so she claims) screams at them



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: jonsnow


Polls are for Dems, liberals and strippers. Oops... was that sexist, I apologize.


Its OK, they'll get over it. Or maybe they won't, but who cares? That is the beauty of our first amendment - they don't have to like what you say, but they sure as hell will recognize your/our right to say it.

Looks like the leftists shouldn't have staked their future on the word of liar attorneys, strippers and easy drunks.

The thing the entire low-information follower non-leader PC culture forgets is that we don't give a # what they think or say. Their "public opinion" PC outrage SJW bull# means nothing to us actual Americans. Our patriotism, our love for the Constitution, our respect for the flag and our reverence for our military/LE means more to me than any virtue signalling SJW wedge-poster-cause.
edit on 10/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:51 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


with someone who's alive and honest.


That's right, can't just dress a stinking rotting fish up in a suit and tie and call him/her a politician

(yet somehow Maxine Waters has gotten away with it....)



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Wayfarer


It's not a criminal investigation, and the named witnesses were interviewed. As to Dr. Ford, her testimony and written statement are already on record. Any decent lawyer would advise her, to not continue any further interviews in fear of a changed, or mismatched (to previous recorded testimony) testimony.

But hey, if you think giving her more rope would be a good idea ; Well I differ in my opinion.




If anything, this has further damaged women. But hey, it was worth it right? Because, politics.


Polls are suggesting that this whole debacle has not improved Republican standing with women voters. Of course time will tell whether Kavanughs appointment fires up conservative voters or lulls them into complacency...


I guess it depends on what polls you're being shown. The Dem advantage on the generic ballot was double digits before this Kavanaugh sham started. Now it's down to 4 or 5 points, depending on who you get your numbers from. R enthusiasm is up. D enthusiasm was already high.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Wayfarer


It's not a criminal investigation, and the named witnesses were interviewed. As to Dr. Ford, her testimony and written statement are already on record. Any decent lawyer would advise her, to not continue any further interviews in fear of a changed, or mismatched (to previous recorded testimony) testimony.

But hey, if you think giving her more rope would be a good idea ; Well I differ in my opinion.




If anything, this has further damaged women. But hey, it was worth it right? Because, politics.


Polls are suggesting that this whole debacle has not improved Republican standing with women voters. Of course time will tell whether Kavanughs appointment fires up conservative voters or lulls them into complacency...


I guess it depends on what polls you're being shown. The Dem advantage on the generic ballot was double digits before this Kavanaugh sham started. Now it's down to 4 or 5 points, depending on who you get your numbers from. R enthusiasm is up. D enthusiasm was already high.


Yes but my supposition you linked suggest that there is some concern among conservatives that once Kavanugh is appointed there will be a dearth of excitement as one of the pillars of Trump's presidency has been achieved; insomuch as even those people that were luke warm on Trump were extremely fired up about a SC nominee (on account of the longer time-frame implications of such an appointment). Now that the biggest concern element has been achieved they perceive to have less at stake in future elections that may concern those semi-regular voters from coming to the polls.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Sen. Dianne Feinstein Wants FBI Report on Kavanaugh Accusations Sealed


Senator Diane Feinstein, the woman who initiated the entire Kavanaugh accuser spectacle, suddenly wants to see any results from the FBI investigation into alleged sexual misconduct sealed from the public.

The question, of course, is why? Seems like she may be getting out in front of a report that doesn’t exactly reveal the type of information the Democrats had been hoping for.


Now, THIS is an interesting development! What is she hiding?



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns
Dittos and Amen.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Sen. Dianne Feinstein Wants FBI Report on Kavanaugh Accusations Sealed


Senator Diane Feinstein, the woman who initiated the entire Kavanaugh accuser spectacle, suddenly wants to see any results from the FBI investigation into alleged sexual misconduct sealed from the public.

The question, of course, is why? Seems like she may be getting out in front of a report that doesn’t exactly reveal the type of information the Democrats had been hoping for.


Now, THIS is an interesting development! What is she hiding?


Maybe somebody at the FBI who is well connected to some Democrat groups wanted to apply for a FISA warrant.

💥🔑🔓



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Sen. Dianne Feinstein Wants FBI Report on Kavanaugh Accusations Sealed


Senator Diane Feinstein, the woman who initiated the entire Kavanaugh accuser spectacle, suddenly wants to see any results from the FBI investigation into alleged sexual misconduct sealed from the public.

The question, of course, is why? Seems like she may be getting out in front of a report that doesn’t exactly reveal the type of information the Democrats had been hoping for.


Now, THIS is an interesting development! What is she hiding?

What indeed?
Is there more to this than the fact that she sat on this until the 11th hour?



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Sen. Dianne Feinstein Wants FBI Report on Kavanaugh Accusations Sealed


Senator Diane Feinstein, the woman who initiated the entire Kavanaugh accuser spectacle, suddenly wants to see any results from the FBI investigation into alleged sexual misconduct sealed from the public.

The question, of course, is why? Seems like she may be getting out in front of a report that doesn’t exactly reveal the type of information the Democrats had been hoping for.


Now, THIS is an interesting development! What is she hiding?


My bet is it will leak....old people and leaking go hand in hand....

Anywho....cant wait to see if they release this. I would think that because all of the people spoken to have been named already that they wouldn't have any issue releasing them. May even see Trump order them to do so.

Or maybe let them be sealed and then opened in a couple weeks to "let the cat out of the bag" on the dems just before midterms and allow them to eat eachother.



new topics

top topics



 
60
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join