It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: NthOther
1. Make a false allegation.
2. If he gets angry, then he's unfit.
3. If he doesn't get angry, that means he didn't react normally, and so he's unfit.
Did I leave out anything?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: NthOther
1. Make a false allegation.
2. If he gets angry, then he's unfit.
3. If he doesn't get angry, that means he didn't react normally, and so he's unfit.
Did I leave out anything?
originally posted by: underwerks
Kavanaugh thread 10,031, saying the same thing and nothing new. Over and over.
If I was a smarter man I’d say you guys seem a bit scared of something.
originally posted by: Bicent
As far as I can tell this should be a political disaster for democrats. How on earth this will read in the history books is the question. Studying this 10 years from now will make the truth definitive, a very poor morally low political maneuver that is looking more and more sinister.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: underwerks
Kavanaugh thread 10,031, saying the same thing and nothing new. Over and over.
If I was a smarter man I’d say you guys seem a bit scared of something.
If you were a smarter man you wouldn't have just posted that.
You’re probably right judging from the OP and the responses. Anything not the party line is a threat.
I see you didn't even understand my post.
I should have anticipated that.
Have a nice day!
I see you didn’t understand I understood your post.
And I always do!
originally posted by: DBCowboy
The Leftist Authoritarian Party has lost the Executive branch of government.
They have lost the Legislative branch of government and aren't sure that they can get it back.
They are about to lose the Judicial branch of government.
I would not put it past them, the "LAP"'s. . . . to assassinate a republican member of the senate to delay or stall the vote on Kavanaugh.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: LSU2018
Probably not. Since she could not be specific for date, place, time, year, then she's probably safe.
And that's why she did not specify date, place, time, year. It was never meant to be specific, it was only done to insert the question that Kavanaugh "might" have done something at some time at some place at some year.
originally posted by: Archivalist
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: NthOther
1. Make a false allegation.
2. If he gets angry, then he's unfit.
3. If he doesn't get angry, that means he didn't react normally, and so he's unfit.
Did I leave out anything?
Interesting point of view on the matter. I'm more interested in white washed testimony from a potential Supreme Justice.
Can you find me some references for the phrase "Devil's Triangle" as a drinking game or "Boof" as fart, before the last month or so?
originally posted by: Archivalist
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: NthOther
1. Make a false allegation.
2. If he gets angry, then he's unfit.
3. If he doesn't get angry, that means he didn't react normally, and so he's unfit.
Did I leave out anything?
Interesting point of view on the matter. I'm more interested in white washed testimony from a potential Supreme Justice.
Can you find me some references for the phrase "Devil's Triangle" as a drinking game or "Boof" as fart, before the last month or so?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: NthOther
you had me agreeing with you 100% - till you blew it with the last line
originally posted by: underwerks
Kavanaugh thread 10,031, saying the same thing and nothing new. Over and over.
If I was a smarter man I’d say you guys seem a bit scared of something.
My wife was just wondering the same thing the other day. She asked me how I think the history books in schools will portray this when our 2 year old is in high school.