It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: loam
a reply to: theantediluvian
Your posts are getting more and more ridiculous. They're their own best rebuttal.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
...overwrought posturing...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
The notion of due process has been around since the magna carta.
We aren't talking about a 'notion' and people's feelings, we're talking about the legal definition in the United States justice system and your definition aint it.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: NiNjABackflip
How could the process be done different/better? honest question because I don't know.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Due process existed prior to the United States justice system, and even before the “notion” of the United States passed through someone’s grey matter. Definitions, Rights and laws don’t just appear out of nowhere.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Due process existed prior to the United States justice system, and even before the “notion” of the United States passed through someone’s grey matter. Definitions, Rights and laws don’t just appear out of nowhere.
That's nice, but in the United States, when we talk about due process, we are discussing the legal aspect of the judicial system. If you'd like you use definitions from other times and places maybe get Krybaby to appear before Parliament in the 1600's.
It's not a hard concept to fathom, especially since you have the actual definition.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
“We”? That’s strange because is sounds like only yourself and other “literalists”...
Meanwhile we have almost the entire msm, and democratic senators, believing ford based on no evidence whatsoever.
But hey, at least you are calling out the big dogs on ats!
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
Why do you call him Krybaby? Is it because you can't spell Kavanaugh or because you lack respect?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
“We”? That’s strange because is sounds like only yourself and other “literalists”...
When I say 'we' I am referring to people who understand the Constitution as opposed to emotional hysterics who don't.
'Someone said sumptin bout mah boi! We needs due process!'
'He should take them to court and get his due process.'
'Wah?'
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
Why do you call him Krybaby? Is it because you can't spell Kavanaugh or because you lack respect?
It's because he's a weepy bitch who doesn't deserve my respect.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Do you or do you not believe Kavanaugh, as a man both being confirmed to the highest court in the land and accused of sexual assault, gang rape, and indescent exposure, should be treated with any sort of considerations resembling “due process”? The founders certainly did.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Do you or do you not believe Kavanaugh, as a man both being confirmed to the highest court in the land and accused of sexual assault, gang rape, and indescent exposure, should be treated with any sort of considerations resembling “due process”? The founders certainly did.
Yes, in a court of law, just like the rest of us.