It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rapier28
Originally posted by RebelSaint
I think its safe to say the good guys won this argument
I think it's hardly a cause for celebration.
The Israeli-Palestinian-Muslim conflict hardly contains any good guys. (all the "good guys" have being assassinated by they own people)
It's just as stupid to deny proper Palestinian complaints of Israeli settlements, and relocation as it is to deny Jews a proper homeland after so long.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
a) Attacked Israel when Israel was declared a free state and asked Arabs to leave the country so that Jews can be pushed into the sea. After whcih the Arabs would return to their homes.
b) After the defeat of the Arabs by the Jews the Arabs never absorbed the misplaced populations (of there own making). In effect, creating the Palestinian problem as a counter to the Legitimacy of Israel.
After 58 years Israel's existance is a fact - Israel has contributed more to the world in terms of cultural, scientific and yes moral output than the entire Arab world put together for the last 100 years.
I think that the Palestinians need to 'loose' something for engaging in decades of terrorism, murder, rape and lies. This would mean that - Yes they deserve a homeland but one that is part of Jordan on the West Bank, Part of Egypt on the Gaza strip and a mutual transfer of populations and lands between Israel and 'Palestine'. So that Israel as well as 'Palestine' would be sustainable.
I fear that creating 'Palestine' on the entire West Bank will only create more problems that it solves. When Arab countries can split Israel in half in the narrowest strip of Israel (being 11 miles). This will be too tempting not to try.
Originally posted by rapier28
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
a) Attacked Israel when Israel was declared a free state and asked Arabs to leave the country so that Jews can be pushed into the sea. After whcih the Arabs would return to their homes.
b) After the defeat of the Arabs by the Jews the Arabs never absorbed the misplaced populations (of there own making). In effect, creating the Palestinian problem as a counter to the Legitimacy of Israel.
You must admit though that they had some cause for skepticism about they eventual return.
After 58 years Israel's existance is a fact - Israel has contributed more to the world in terms of cultural, scientific and yes moral output than the entire Arab world put together for the last 100 years.
I think it is fair to say that Jews are as a whole, are very intelligent and have contributed to mankind in many many ways.
I think that the Palestinians need to 'loose' something for engaging in decades of terrorism, murder, rape and lies. This would mean that - Yes they deserve a homeland but one that is part of Jordan on the West Bank, Part of Egypt on the Gaza strip and a mutual transfer of populations and lands between Israel and 'Palestine'. So that Israel as well as 'Palestine' would be sustainable.
I fear that creating 'Palestine' on the entire West Bank will only create more problems that it solves. When Arab countries can split Israel in half in the narrowest strip of Israel (being 11 miles). This will be too tempting not to try.
The only problem with that is that the Palestinians will never agree to such a proposal, the bombings will go on. This will be followed by military action and more bombings...
It will not solve the problem.
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
i personally believe you have to look more towards the christian religion, specifically the end of times prophecies, to see why the US decides to back Israel. And FYI for whoever said that Muslims and Christians were fighting way before there was an Israel, there was an Israel way before there were Muslims and Christians, but i get what you meant by that.
Originally posted by rapier28
If the prophecies fortell a destruction due to conflict in the Middle East, then i'm very glad that i'am here in Australia.
Originally posted by edsinger
Israel
Area:slightly smaller than New Jersey
Population : 6,199,008
GDP - $120.9 billion (2003 est.)
Exports :$29.32 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Imports:$32.27 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Economic aid - recipient: $662 million from US (2003 est.)
Egypt
Area:slightly more than three times the size of New Mexico
Population:76,117,421 (July 2004 est.)
GDP: $295.2 billion (2003 est.)
Exports:$8.759 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Imports:$14.75 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Economic aid - recipient:ODA, $1.2 billion (2001)
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
1- The entire area now considered Israel (including Gaza and West Bank) was mostly a barren wasteland. This can be validated by:
a) Pictures from that time period (late 1800s) -see the Al-Aqtza Moseque at the time was in poor shape.
b) Mark Twain's visit at that same time - He refered to the area as being a barren wasteland.
c) The British Census in the late 1800s/early 1900s.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
2- Arab immigration was intensified during the early 1900s since jobs were available because of the British colonization and Jewish immigration.
3- Much of todays Palestinians were of Iraqi, Sudani, Yemeni decent. Yassir Arafat himself was Egyptian (born and raised - He spent a short time in Jerusalem with his Uncle).
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
4- The 'Palestinian problem' was a problem created by the Arab world who:
a) Attacked Israel when Israel was declared a free state and asked Arabs to leave the country so that Jews can be pushed into the sea. After whcih the Arabs would return to their homes.
b) After the defeat of the Arabs by the Jews the Arabs never absorbed the misplaced populations (of there own making). In effect, creating the Palestinian problem as a counter to the Legitimacy of Israel.
C) Enthusiastically supported terrorist actions against Israel and its Civilian population - In the name of the misplaced population which they created
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by edsinger
Israel
Area:slightly smaller than New Jersey
Population : 6,199,008
GDP - $120.9 billion (2003 est.)
Exports :$29.32 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Imports:$32.27 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Economic aid - recipient: $662 million from US (2003 est.)
Egypt
Area:slightly more than three times the size of New Mexico
Population:76,117,421 (July 2004 est.)
GDP: $295.2 billion (2003 est.)
Exports:$8.759 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Imports:$14.75 billion f.o.b. (2003 est.)
Economic aid - recipient:ODA, $1.2 billion (2001)
Where did you get those figures Ed?
Those figures are wrong.
Check the document on foreign aid for 2001 from the following site:
www.state.gov...
Israel:
$840 million in ESF (Economic Support Fund)
$1.98 billion in FSF (Foreign Military Financing)
$2.82 billion total
Egypt:
$692.6 million in ESF (Economic Support Fund)
$1.294 billion in FSF (Foreign Military Financing)
$1.1 million in IMET (International Military Education & Training)
$1.987 billion total
[edit on 1-3-2005 by AceOfBase]
Originally posted by Asia Minor
You guys can have this arguement. I'm debating with Jews? No reason to even carry on with the conversation. Why would you admit you countless crimes against humanity? I'm finished.
I'm debating with Jews? No reason to even carry on with the conversation.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Your reference to crop cultivation makes no arguement. Although the link you supplied provided good insight into the history of the region. One problem though - It is from the UN. The UN it blatently ANTI-ISRAEL and quite controlled by Arab interests.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Regarding the article about the forced displacement of the Palestinians by Jews - Yes it did happen but this was a small minority of the refugees.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Your reference to crop cultivation makes no arguement. Although the link you supplied provided good insight into the history of the region. One problem though - It is from the UN. The UN it blatently ANTI-ISRAEL and quite controlled by Arab interests.
Read the dates of those documents I linked to.
One is from 1945 League of Nations and predates the United Nations.
The other document is from 1947 and is the document that called for the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states so your comment about them being anti-Israel doesn't work.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Regarding the article about the forced displacement of the Palestinians by Jews - Yes it did happen but this was a small minority of the refugees.
I disagree that it was a small minority.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
some more truth by Arabs www.freemuslims.org...
Palestine report on immigration, land settlement and development
Results of Jewish Settlement.
The results of Jewish colonisation of the Vale of Esdraelon are varied. In some villages there are clear signs of success; in others, the opposite is the case. The village of Afuleh, which the American Zionist Commonwealth boomed as the Chicago of Palestine, is a sea of thistles through which one travels for long distances. A plague of field mice, which has done extensive damage to both Jewish and Arab cultivation in the Vale during the present year was officially stated to be due to the fact that 30,000 dunams of the land held by the Jews are derelict and covered with weeds. It is also a fact that in a number of villages the tithes paid by the Jews are considerably below those paid by the Arabs who formerly cultivated those villages.
Its Past.
It is a mistake to assume that the Vale of Esdraelon was a wilderness before the arrival of the Jewish settlers and that it is now a paradise. A very large amount of money has been spent by the various Jewish agencies, and great improvements have been made. The work that has been done, especially in the direction of drainage and the introduction of new and improved methods of agriculture is highly valuable. There can be little doubt that in time, the application of capital, science, and labour will result in general success. It is, however, unjust to the povertystricken fellah' who has been removed from these lands that the suggestion should continually be made that he was a useless cumberer of the ground and produced nothing from it. It should be quite obvious that this is not the fact.
In ancient times Esdraelon was the granary, and by the Arabs is still regarded as the most fertile tract of Palestine. The soreness felt owing to the sale of large areas by the absentee Sursock family to the Jews and the displacement of the Arab tenants is still acute. It was evident on every occasion of discussion with the Arabs, both effendi and fellahin.
A World Without Israel