It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sex Crimes Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell COMPLETELY EXONERATES Judge Kavanaugh in new report

page: 9
78
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

You sure they are yours?


I'm sure mine are mine.... I'm 6'5" and my wife is Asian, and so I have two 6'4" Asian looking boys with like size 13 feet that can palm a B-ball easily... yep they are mine.




posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

That doesnt mean anything.. I would ask for a test
and not the kind administered to Ford where only 2 questions were asked. You can get false positives.



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Xcathdra

You sure they are yours?


I'm sure mine are mine.... I'm 6'5" and my wife is Asian, and so I have two 6'4" Asian looking boys with like size 13 feet that can palm a B-ball easily... yep they are mine.



That's racist....



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

That's racist....


Ya, when I tell my boys they are the brownest white boys around... ya I'm a racist bad dad...lol



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 09:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

That's racist....


Ya, when I tell my boys they are the brownest white boys around... ya I'm a racist bad dad...lol


LOL...I meant you were implying she was short because she is Asian....

You have to think like em to beat em.....



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 09:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe


You have to think like em to beat em.....


naw she is 5'7"



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

hilary , is that you ?????????????????????

what diference it makes is :

the article leads with the claim that ms mitchell is a " none partisan 3rd party " - thats a lie

and it does not bode well for the rest of the article



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Vasa Croe


You have to think like em to beat em.....


naw she is 5'7"



So I guess that makes me the racist....total backfire....



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: xuenchen

hilary , is that you ?????????????????????

what diference it makes is :

the article leads with the claim that ms mitchell is a " none partisan 3rd party " - thats a lie

and it does not bode well for the rest of the article


Oh boy....you got home from work and are gearing up for the spam attacks!

Actually Mitchell is kinda beyond reproach from attacks....guessing you haven't looked into her history of cases much.

If you had, you wouldn't be attacking her.
edit on 10/1/18 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

where have i attacked ms mitchell ?????????????

please stop fantasising

she is NOT " non partisan " - get over it

thats all i said



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: xuenchen

the article leads with the claim that ms mitchell is a " none partisan 3rd party " - thats a lie


can you expand on that?



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

If Ms Mitchell (an outside prosecutor from Arizona) is ''none partisan'' because she voted Republican..

then what does that say about Mueller's entire team of ''Democrats''?

I thought they were ok, because they were fair minded and non partisan..


Mitchell has worked as a prosecutor since 1993, according to Grassley’s statement. She is the deputy county attorney for the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and chief of the Special Victims Division



Prior to heading the Special Victims Division, Mitchell ran the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office sex-crimes bureau, which is responsible for prosecuting sex-related felonies, such as adult sexual assault, child molestation and child prostitution offenses. Mitchell supervised the bureau for 12 years, according to Grassley.


Oh I see... she cannot be trusted or relied upon because


Mitchell is a registered Republican, according to the Washington Post. The Post reports Mitchell previously donated to the campaign of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who is a Republican.


And not because


questioned the credibility of her accusations and called the case "weak" in her assessment of Ford's allegations.


or because she said


"In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A "he said, she said" case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that,"


or she stated


Mitchell's report says that Democrats and Ford's own attorneys were "likely affected Dr. Ford's account."


edit on 1/10/18 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)

edit on 1/10/18 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Vasa Croe

where have i attacked ms mitchell ?????????????

please stop fantasising

she is NOT " non partisan " - get over it

thats all i said


Cool...let me know how she is not non partisan. Everyone agreed on her for the hearing and her record is impeccable.

Is it because she is a registered Republican? If so, then so is Mueller so I guess we can nullify that argument.
edit on 10/1/18 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 11:10 PM
link   
Why There’s A Good Case For Sanctioning Christine Blasey Ford’s Lawyers - Did Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers deprive her of the opportunity to make an informed decision about whether to accept the committee’s offer to interview her in California?


Like most professions, lawyers have codes of professional responsibility under which they operate. In the case of Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford’s counsel may well have violated them.



Kevin McCullough

@KMCRadio

BREAKING: Multiple sources now telling me 3 additional investigations are about to open:

1. @FBI - felony lying to Congress by accusers making false claims.
2. Congress - @SenFeinstein’s handling of Ford letter.
3. DC Bar - into Ford’s attorneys malpractice.#payback
4:02 PM - Sep 30, 2018


It has been widely reported that the Senate Judiciary Committee offered to send investigators to California to speak with Ford. Ford did not accept this offer. In addition, Ford reportedly was unable to attend a hearing set for Sept. 24 because she is afraid of flying and could not otherwise get to Washington by that date. The committee agreed to delay its hearing to Sept. 27.

Yet in her testimony, Ford stated it was not clear to her that the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC) had offered to take her statements and testimony in California to prevent her from having to fly. Ford testified she would have accepted the offer had she known about it.

Indeed, she testified to Chairman Chuck Grassley, “If you were gonna come out to see me I would have happily hosted you and would have been happy to speak to you out there. It wasn’t clear to me that that was the case.” Ford also testified, “I was hoping that they would come to me [in California] but I realized that was an unrealistic request.” Not only was it not unrealistic, the offer was on the table.

Here I’ll assume Ford testified truthfully that she was not clear about the Judiciary Committee’s offer. (The alternative raises its own issues.) If Ford’s attorneys did not inform her clearly of the SJC’s offer, the Judiciary Committee could file a grievance against Ford’s attorneys, Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich, with the DC Bar. It would be even worse if they withheld this information from Ford because they were interested in a delay of the hearing for reasons other than their client’s interests.


click link for full article...

The article deals with the legal technicalities that apply to lawyers so it is a bit of a dry read but those who are interested here ya go.

Regarding #2 - Investigation into Feinstein.
She and her staff have already denied leaking Ford's info to the media. As I posted a few pages back (www.abovetopsecret.com...) Ford first contacted US Rep Eshoo (D-CA) before anyone else. Eshoo took Ford's letter to Feinstein and dropped it off (Eshoo knew what the contents of the letter contained since Ford confided in her first). There was a disagreement between them on how to use the info, with Feinstein wanting to keep the info confidential as per the agreement. The reporter who broke the story (works for the intercept) when on record saying his source was not Feinstein or any members of her staff.

When Democrats first heard of the letter they sent requests to Feinstein to see the letter and all requests were denied by Feinstein.

That leaves Rep Eshoo or Ford herself. Either of which present problems for Democrats and their agenda.
edit on 1-10-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2018 @ 11:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape

she is NOT " non partisan " - get over it

thats all i said

I'm not sure how you can say that....



posted on Oct, 2 2018 @ 03:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop




If Ms Mitchell (an outside prosecutor from Arizona) is ''none partisan'' because she voted Republican..

then what does that say about Mueller's entire team of ''Democrats''?

I thought they were ok, because they were fair minded and non partisan..


The dynamic of Mueller is Political Elites that are angry an outsider was elected president on an investigation started by individuals that stated they would try to prevent Trump from being president, they had an insurance policy, and firewalls.That is very different than being partisan.

Is that a false statement



posted on Oct, 2 2018 @ 08:37 AM
link   

the article leads with the claim that ms mitchell is a " none partisan 3rd party " - thats a lie

and it does not bode well for the rest of the article


So ignore the article and just read her report. Simple enough.



posted on Oct, 2 2018 @ 08:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Xcathdra

You sure they are yours?


I'm sure mine are mine.... I'm 6'5" and my wife is Asian, and so I have two 6'4" Asian looking boys with like size 13 feet that can palm a B-ball easily... yep they are mine.





I love that description!



posted on Oct, 2 2018 @ 08:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown
Christine Blasey Ford’s claims have now been shut down. In front of our eyes Ford has turned into a Edsel. Just another ugly overhyped thing that didn’t live up to it’s expectations .


Christine Blasey Edsel! Time to haul her broke down arse back to California where she fits in with society.




posted on Oct, 2 2018 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: jrod
So most of you believe this show is a conspiracy from the left to destroy an innocent man(Kavanought) so he will not be appointed?

Asking for a friend.


No. There's a difference between believe and know. Here, I'll show you.

Believe: accept (something) as true; feel sure of the truth of.

Know: be aware of through observation, inquiry, or information.

Tell your friend.




top topics



 
78
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join